Advertisement

Policy Transfer in the Context of Multi-level Governance

  • Benjamin HawkinsEmail author
  • Chris Holden
  • Sophie Mackinder
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Public Health Policy Research book series (PSPHPR)

Abstract

This chapter reviews the theoretical literature relating to the core concepts used in the study: multi-level governance and policy transfer. The evolution of the concept of policy transfer is traced through discussions of associated concepts such as policy diffusion, policy convergence, policy learning and lesson-drawing. It discusses the development of these ideas through the models of Dolowitz and Marsh, and Evans and Davies. Most importantly for this book, the chapter discusses developments in the literature that consider policy transfer beyond ‘methodological nationalism’—the assumption that policy transfer involves bilateral lesson-drawing between states—to focus on the roles of international organisations and non-state actors.

Keywords

Multi-level governance Policy transfer Policy learning Corporations Tobacco control 

Bibliography

  1. Adler, E., & Haas, P. (1992). Conclusion: Epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program. In P. Haas (ed.), Knowledge, power and international policy coordination. A Special Issue of International Organisation, 46(1), 367–390.Google Scholar
  2. Asare, B., Cairney, P., & Studlar, D. T. (2009). Federalism and multilevel governance in tobacco policy: The European Union, the United Kingdom, and devolved UK institutions. Journal of Public Policy, 29(1), 79–102.Google Scholar
  3. Bache, I. (1998). Politics of European Union regional policy: Multi-level governance or flexible gatekeeping? Sheffield: Continuum.Google Scholar
  4. Bache, I. (2008). Europeanization and multilevel governance: Cohesion policy in the European Union and Britain. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  5. Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (2004). Multi-level governance and the study of the British state. Public Policy and Administration, 19(1), 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bache, I., & Jordan, A. (Eds.). (2006). The Europeanization of British politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1044–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beisheim, M., Campe, S., & Schäferhoff, M. (2010). Global governance through public-private partnerships. In H. Enderlein, S. Wälti, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on multi-level governance (pp. 370–382). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, C. J. (1991). What is policy convergence and what causes it? British Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2011). What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited. Political Studies Review, 9(3), 366–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1999). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 169–200). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  12. Boli-Bennett, J., & Meyer, J. (1978). The ideology of childhood and the state: Rules distinguishing children in national constitutions, 1870–1970. American Sociological Review, 43, 797–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bomberg, E., & Peterson, J. (2000). Policy transfer and Europeanization: Passing the Heineken Test? (Queen’s Papers on Europeanisation p0002). Queen’s University Belfast.Google Scholar
  14. Börzel, T., & Risse, T. (2007). Europeanization: The domestic impact of European Union politics. In K. E. Jorgensen, M. A. Pollack, & B. Rosamond (Eds.), Handbook of European Union politics (pp. 483–504). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Bouwen, P. (2002). Corporate lobbying in the European Union: The logic of access. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(3), 365–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bulmer, S., Dolowitz, D., Humphreys, P., & Padgett, S. (2007). Policy transfer in European Union governance: Regulating the utilities. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bulmer, S., & Padgett, S. (2005). Policy transfer in the European Union: An institutionalist perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cairney, P. (2007). A “multiple lenses” approach to policy change: The case of tobacco policy in the UK. British Politics, 2(1), 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cairney, P., Studlar, D., & Mamudu, H. (2012). Global tobacco control: Power, policy, governance and transfer. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chatwin, C. (2007). Multi-level governance: The way forward for European illicit drug policy? International Journal of Drug Policy, 18(6), 494–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coen, D. (1997). The evolution of the large firm as a political actor in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(1), 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coen, D. (2007). Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Conzelmann, T. (2008). A new mode of governing? Multi-level governance between cooperation and conflict. In T. Conzelmann & R. Smith (Eds.), Multi-level governance in the European Union: Tasking stock and looking ahead (pp. 11–30). Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. de Prado, C. (2007). Global multi-level governance: European and East Asian leadership. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  25. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dobbin, F., Simmons, B., & Garrett, G. (2007). The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from Abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dunlop, C. A. (2009). Policy transfer as learning: Capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies, 30(3), 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dur, A., & Mateo, G. (2012). Who lobbies the European Union? National interest groups in a multilevel polity. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(7), 969–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dwyer, P., & Ellison, N. (2009). ‘We nicked stuff from all over the place’: Policy transfer or muddling through? Policy & Politics, 37(3), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Enderlein, H. (2010). Economic policy-making and multi-level governance. In H. Enderlein, S. Wälti, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on multi-level governance (pp. 423–440). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Evans, M. (Ed.). (2004). Policy transfer in global perspective. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Evans, M. (2009). Policy transfer in critical perspective. Policy Studies, 30(3), 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Evans, M. (Ed.). (2010). New directions in the study of policy transfer. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Evans, M., & Davies, J. (1999). Understanding policy transfer: A multi-level, multi-disciplinary perspective. Public Administration, 77(2), 361–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Farnsworth, K. (2004). Corporate power and social policy in a global economy. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Featherstone, K., & Radaelli, C. (Eds.). (2003). The politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking stock: The constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gray, V. (1973). Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 67, 1174–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gruber, L. (2000). Ruling the world: Power politics and the rise of supranational institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policy making in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25, 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harlow, C., & Rawlings, R. (2006). Promoting accountability in multi-level governance: A network approach (European Governance Papers).Google Scholar
  44. Havlík, V., & Kuchyñková, P. (2017). Cities and regions in competition? Negotiations for the 2014–2020 programming period in the Czech Republic. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 13(50), 90–109.Google Scholar
  45. Hawkins, B., & Holden, C. (2013). Framing the alcohol policy debate: Industry actors and the regulation of the UK beverage alcohol market. Critical Policy Studies, 7(1), 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Héritier, A. (1996). The accommodation of diversity in European policy-making and its outcomes: Regulatory policy as a patchwork. Journal of European Public Policy, 3, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hodson, D., & Maher, I. (2001). The open method as a new mode of governance: The case of soft economic policy coordination. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(4), 719–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Holden, C., & Hawkins, B. (2016). Health policy, corporate influence and multi-level governance: The case of alcohol policy in the European Union. In N. Kenworthy, R. Mackenzie, & K. Lee (Eds.), Case studies on corporations and global health governance: Impacts, influence and accountability (pp. 145–158). London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  49. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  50. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.Google Scholar
  51. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2008). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hudson, J., & Lowe, S. (2009). Understanding the policy process: Analysing welfare policy and practice (2nd ed.). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  53. Hulme, R. (2005). Policy transfer and the internationalisation of social policy. Social Policy & Society, 4(4), 417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ikenberry, G. J. (1990). The international spread of privatization policies: Inducements, learning and “policy band wagoning”. In E. Suleiman & J. Waterbury (Eds.), The political economy of public sector reform and privatization. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  55. James, O., & Lodge, M. (2003). The limitations of ‘policy transfer’ and ‘lesson drawing’ for public policy research. Political Studies Review, 1(2), 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jessop, B. (2004). Multi-level governance and multi-level metagovernance. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 49–74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jones, T., & Newburn, T. (2006). Policy transfer and criminal justice. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Kaiser, R., & Prange, H. (2004). Managing diversity in a system of multi-level governance: The open method of co-ordination in innovation policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kaul, I. (2010). The changing role of the United Nations: Lessons for multi-level governance. In H. Enderlein, S. Wälti, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on multi-level governance (pp. 323–342). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  60. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1999). Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal, 51(159), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  62. Knodt, M. (2004). International embeddedness of European multi-level governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 701–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kohler-Koch, B., & Eising, R. (Eds.). (1999). The transformation of governance in the European Union. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Lang, T., & Rayner, G. (2005). Obesity: A growing issue for European policy? Journal of European Social Policy, 15(4), 301–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mamudu, H. M., & Studlar, D. T. (2009). Multilevel governance and shared sovereignty: European Union, member states, and the FCTC. Governance, 22(1), 73–97.Google Scholar
  66. Marks, G. (1993). Structural policy and multi-level governance in the EC. In A. Cafruny & G. Rosenthal (Eds.), The state of the European Community: The Maastricht debate and beyond (pp. 391–411). Lynne Reinner: Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  67. Marks, G., & Hooghe, L. (2004). Contrasting visions of multi-level governance. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 15–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Blank, K. (1996). European integration from the 1980s: State-centric v Multi-level governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 341–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992a). New directions in the study of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992b). Policy networks in British government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mavrot, C., & Sager, F. (2018). Vertical epistemic communities in multilevel governance. Policy & Politics, 46(3), 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. May, P. J. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of Public Policy, 12(4), 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mazey, S., & Richardson, J. (2006). Interest groups and EU policy-making: Organisational logic and venue shopping. In J. Richardson (Ed.), European Union: Power and policy-making. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. Moseley, P., Harrigan, J., & Tove, F. J. F. (1995). Aid and power: The World Bank and policy-based lending (Vol. 1). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Obydenkova, A. (2010). Multi-level governance in post-Soviet Eurasia: Problems and promises. In H. Enderlein, S. Wälti, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on multi-level governance (pp. 292–307). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  76. Olsson, J. (2003). Democracy paradoxes in multi-level governance: Theorizing on structural fund system research. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(2), 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Orenstein, M. (2003). Mapping the diffusion of pension innovation. In R. Holzmann, M. Orenstein, & M. Rutkowski (Eds.), Pension reform in Europe: Process and progress. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  78. Peters, B., & Pierre, J. (2004). Multi-level governance and democracy: A Faustian bargain? In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 75–89). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pierson, C. (2003). Learning from labor? Welfare policy transfer between Australia and Britain. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 41(1), 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Radaelli, C. (2000). Policy transfer in the European Union: Institutional isomorphism as a source of legitimacy. Governance, 13(1), 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Radaelli, C. (2008). Europeanization, policy learning, and new modes of governance. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 10(3), 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rose, R. (1991). What is Lesson-Drawing? Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rose, R. (1993). Lesson drawing in public policy: A guide to learning across time and space. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  84. Rose, R. (2005). Learning from comparative public policy: A practical guide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Sbragia, A. (2010). Multi-level governance and comparative regionalism. In H. Enderlein, S. Wälti, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on multi-level governance (pp. 267–278). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  86. Scharpf, F. (1997). Introduction: The problem-solving capacity of multi-level governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(4), 520–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schmitter, P., & Kim, S. (2005). The experience of European integration and the potential for Northeast Asian integration. East-West Center Working Papers, 10, 1–23. Available at https://www.eastwestcenter.org/sites/default/files/private/PSwp010.pdf. Accessed 9 February 2019.
  88. Schreurs, M. (2010). Multi-level governance the ASEAN way. In H. Enderlein, S. Wälti, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on multi-level governance (pp. 308–320). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  89. Stephenson, P. (2013). Twenty years of multi-level governance: ‘Where does it come from? What is it? Where is it going?’ Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 817–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Stone, D. (2012). Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies, 33(6), 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22, 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Studlar, D. T. (2006). Tobacco control policy instruments in a shrinking world: How much policy learning? International Journal of Public Administration, 24(4–6), 367–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Studlar, D. T. (2008). US tobacco control: Public health, political economy, or morality policy? Review of Policy Research, 25(5), 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Studlar, D. T. (2009). Tobacco control policy in Western Europe: A case of protracted paradigm change. In G. Capano & M. Howlett (Eds.), European and North American policy change: Drivers and dynamics (pp. 91–110). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  96. Studlar, D. T., Christensen, K. & Sitasari, A. (2011). Tobacco control in the EU-15: The role of member states and the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(5), 728–745.Google Scholar
  97. Vreeland, J. R. (2003). The IMF and economic development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Walker, J. (1969). The diffusion of innovation among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63, 880–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Warleigh-Lack, A. (2008). The EU, ASEAN and APEC in comparative perspective. In P. Murray (Ed.), Europe and Asia: Regions in Flux (pp. 23–41). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. World Health Organization (WHO). (2003). WHO framework convention on tobacco control [Online]. Available at https://www.who.int/tobacco/framework/WHO_FCTC_english.pdf. Accessed 5 February 2019.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin Hawkins
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chris Holden
    • 2
  • Sophie Mackinder
    • 3
  1. 1.London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineLondonUK
  2. 2.University of YorkYorkUK
  3. 3.Social Policy and Social WorkUniversity of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations