The End of Balanced Budgets

  • Paul Winfree


The government grew in size, scope, and responsibility during the Great Depression. By the end of World War II, the dominate position of public policy was that the government had a formal role in promoting economic outcomes. As the government grew to take on new roles, a reorganization became necessary. The new budgeting institutions, in particular the Bureau of the Budget, took on additional responsibilities. Congress and the White House also formerly engaged in a comprehensive policy to replace tariffs with taxes to finance federal spending but also to manage individual behavior. At the same time, the government came to be seen as having an active role in the economy. This was exemplified by the New Deal programs and the Employment Act of 1946.


  1. Barro, Robert. 1987. “Government Spending, Interest Rates, Prices, and Budget Deficits in the United Kingdom, 1701–1918.” Journal of Monetary Economics 20 (2): 221–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beard, Charles A., and George H.E. Smith. 1933. The Future Comes: A Study of the New Deal. New York, NY: The MacMillan Company.Google Scholar
  3. Blakey, Roy G. 1917. “The War Revenue Act of 1917.” The American Economic Review 7 (4): 791–815.Google Scholar
  4. Blakey, Roy G., and Gladys C. Blakey. 1936. “The Revenue Act of 1936.” The American Economic Review 26 (3): 466–482.Google Scholar
  5. Blakey, Roy G., and Gladys C. Blakey. 1938. “The Revenue Act of 1937.” The American Economic Review 28 (3): 447–458.Google Scholar
  6. Bordo, Michael D., and David C. Wheelock. 2013. “Chapter Two – The Promise and Performance of the Federal Reserve as Lender of Last Resort 1914–1933.” In The Origins, History, and Future of the Federal Reserve: A Return to Jekyll Island, edited by Michael D. Bordo and William Roberds, 59–98. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchanan, James M. 1995. “Clarifying Confusion About the Balanced Budget Amendment.” National Tax Journal 48 (3): 347–355.Google Scholar
  8. Cogan, John F. 2017. The High Cost of Good Intentions: A History of U.S. Federal Entitlement Programs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Congressional Record. 76th Cong., 1st sess. 1939. July 27–28.Google Scholar
  10. De Long, J. Bradford. 1996. “Keynesianism, Pennsylvania Avenue Style: Some Economic Consequences of the Employment Act of 1946.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (3): 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 1932. “Democratic Party Platforms, 1932 Democratic Party Platform.” The American Presidency Project. June 27.
  12. Eichengreen, Barry, Asmaa El-Ganainy, Rui Redro Esteves, and Kris James Mitchener. 2019. Public Debt Through the Ages. Working Paper WP/19/6, Washington: IMF.Google Scholar
  13. 2016. FDR: From Budget Balancer to Keynesian.
  14. Fenster, Herbert L., and Christian Volz. 1979. “The Antideficiency Act: Constitutional Control Gone Astray.” Public Contract Law Journal 11 (1): 155–231.Google Scholar
  15. Feyrer, James, and Bruce Sacerdote. 2011. Did the Stimulus Stimulate? Real Time Estimates of the Effects of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Working Paper Number 16759, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  16. Graves, Brooke W. 1947. “Legislative Reference Service for the Congress of the United States.” The American Political Science Review 41 (2): 289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen, Alvin, and Jacob Viner. 1947. “Two Discussions of the Employment Act of 1946 and Its Early Operation.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 29 (2): 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ippolito, Dennis S. 1981. Congressional Spending. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2012. Deficits, Debt, and The New Politics of Tax Policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 1990. Uncertain Legacies: Federal Budget Policy from Roosevelt through Reagan. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2003. Why Budgets Matter: Budget Policy and American Politics. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, Byrd L. 1972. “The Role of Keynesians in Wartime Policy and Postwar Planning.” The American Economic Review 62 (1/2): 125–133.Google Scholar
  23. Kauper, Paul G. 1947. “Significant Developments in the Law of Federal Taxation, 1941–1947.” Michigan Law Review 45 (6): 659–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kennon, David R., and M. Rebecca Rogers. 1989. The Committee on Ways and Means: A Bicentennial History, 1789–1989. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  25. Macy, Ward. 1943. “Social Security Taxes in the War Finance Program.” Journal of Political Economy 51 (2): 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Myers, Margaret G. 1970. A Financial History of the United States. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 1936. “Republican Party Platforms, Republican Party Platform of 1936.” The American Presidency Project. June 9.
  28. 1936. “Republican Party Platforms: Republican Party Platform of 1936.” The American Presidency Project. June 9.
  29. Rockoff, Hugh. 2004. “Until it’s Over, Over There: The U.S. Economy in World War I.” NBER Working Paper (w10580).Google Scholar
  30. The President’s Committee on Administrative Management. 1937. The Report of the Committee with Studies of Administrative Management in the Federal Government. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  31. U.S. Bureau of the Budget. 1940. The Budget of the United States for the Fiscal Year Ending June 20, 1941. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 1947. An Act for the establishment of the Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of the Government. Public Law 80–162, July 7.Google Scholar
  33. Wheildon, L.B. 1948. Legislative budget-making. Editorial Research Reports 1948, Vol. 1, Washington: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  34. Willoughby, W.F. 1931. Financial Condition and Operations of the National Government, 1921–1930. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  35. Winfree, Paul. 2018. Bringing Proverbs to Policy: Classical Economics, Proverbial Wisdom, and Applications for Welfare Policy. Working Paper, Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Winfree
    • 1
  1. 1.Heritage FoundationWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations