Australia: Psychs, Suits and Mess Committees on Steroids: The Changing Terrain of Service Transition in Australia

  • Ben WadhamEmail author
  • Deborah Morris
Part of the International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice book series (IPSPAP)


Ben Wadham’s and Deborah Morris’s chapter Psychs, Suits and Mess Committees on Steroids: The Changing Terrain of Service Transition in Australia begins by asking the reader to consider what happens to one’s way of being in the world as they join the military. Contending that an analysis of how one transitions must be attendant to the whole military life course, and not just how one exits the institution, the chapter brings three critical observations to the fore. Firstly, the authors question ‘who are veterans in Australia’? Secondly, the key challenges of transitioning are identified and placed within the changing context of policy-making. Lastly, the authors suggest that to transition in Australia is to problematically navigate a bureaucracy and political economy of the military industrial complex as a historically challenging relationship between the veteran and the state is met with commodification of veterans’ support. What becomes clear is the psycho-medico-legal lens through which Australian veterans’ transition is both constructed and framed. As transitional experiences are characterised as a private experience rather than an institutional effect, to become a veteran is to be an increasingly precarious position between the state, the society and the market.


Basic training Culture Mental health Bureaucracy Veteran care 


  1. ADF Mental Health Prevalence and Wellbeing Study. (2010). Accessed 2 July 2018.
  2. Alcock, P. (2012). New policy spaces: The impact of devolution on third sector policy in the UK. Social Policy & Administration, 46(2), 219–238. Scholar
  3. Australian War Memorial. (2018). First World War 1914–18, The Australian War Memorial [Online]. Available at: Accessed 2 July 2018.
  4. Bergman, B. P., Burdett, H. J., & Greenberg, N. (2014). Service life and beyond – Institution or culture? The RUSI Journal, 159(5), 60–68. Scholar
  5. Black, T., & Papile, C. (2010). Making it on Civvy street: An online survey of Canadian veterans in transition. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 44(4), 383–401.Google Scholar
  6. Bode, I., & Brandsen, T. (2014). State–third sector partnerships: A short overview of key issues in the debate. Public Management Review, 16(8), 1055–1066. Scholar
  7. Castro, C. A., Kintzle, S., & Hassan, A. M. (2015). The combat veteran paradox: Paradoxes and dilemmas encountered with reintegrating combat veterans and the agencies that support them. Traumatology, 21(4), 299–310. Scholar
  8. Cooper, L., Caddick, N., Godier, L., Cooper, A., Fossey, M., & Engward, H. (2017). A model of military to civilian transition: Bourdieu in action. Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health, 3(2), 53–60. Scholar
  9. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32–53. Scholar
  10. Demers, A. (2011). When veterans return: The role of community in reintegration. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 16(2), 160–179. Scholar
  11. Ex-Service Organisations Mapping Project (ESOMP). (2016). Aspen Foundation. Accessed 2 July 2018.
  12. Feaver, P. D. (1996). The civil-military problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the question of civilian control. Armed Forces & Society, 23(2), 149–178. Scholar
  13. Forces in Mind Trust. (2013). The transition mapping study: Understanding the transition process for service personnel returning to civilian life. Accessed 2 July 2018.
  14. Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee. (2017). The constant battle: Suicide by veterans. Canberra: Senate Printing Unit.Google Scholar
  15. Gabriel, R. (1982). To serve with honour: A treatise on military ethics and the way of the soldier. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gallagher, B. P. (2016). Burdens of proof: Veteran frauds, PTSD pussies, and the spectre of the welfare queen. Critical Military Studies, 2(3), 139–154. Scholar
  17. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Herman, A., & Yarwood, R. (2015). From warfare to welfare: Veterans, military charities and the blurred spatiality of post-service welfare in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 47(12), 2628–2644. Scholar
  19. Higate, P. R. (2001). Theorizing continuity: From military to civilian life. Armed Forces & Society, 27(3), 443–460. Scholar
  20. Hinch, D. (2018). Commonwealth of Australia [video]. Available at: Accessed 2 July 2018.
  21. Hooyer, K. (2012). Going AWOL: Alternative responses to PTSD stigma in the US military. Field Notes: A Journal of Collegiate Anthropology, 4(1), 106–128.Google Scholar
  22. Horner, D. (2001). Making the Australian Defence Force. The Australian centenary history of defence volume IV. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Howell, A. (2012). The demise of PTSD. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 37(3), 214–226. Scholar
  24. Larsson, M. (2009). Shattered Anzacs: Living with the scars of war. Sydney: University of NSW Press.Google Scholar
  25. Larsson, M. (2010). Unsung healers: Anzacs and their family caregivers. Memento, (38), 13–15.Google Scholar
  26. McFarlane, A. C., & Forbes, D. (2015). The journey from moral inferiority to post-traumatic stress disorder. The Medical Journal of Australia, 202(7), 348–349. Scholar
  27. Ministerial Statement. (2017, August 14). Ministerial statement on veteran and their families. Australian Government.Google Scholar
  28. Molendijk, T., Kramer, E.-H., & Verweij, D. (2015). Conflicting notions on violence and ptsd in the military: Institutional and personal narratives of combat-related illness. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 40(3), 338–360. Scholar
  29. Moore, D. (2009). The soldier: A history of courage, sacrifice and brotherhood. London: Icon.Google Scholar
  30. Moskos, C. C. (1977). From institution to occupation. Armed Forces & Society, 4(1), 41–50. Scholar
  31. Mumford, A. (2012). Veteran care in the United Kingdom and the sustainability of the ‘Military Covenant’. The Political Quarterly, 83(4), 820–826. Scholar
  32. Pease, B. (2001). Moving beyond mateship: Reconstructing Australian men’s practices. In B. Pease & K. Pringle (Eds.), A man’s world? Changing men’s practices in a globalised world (pp. 191–220). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  33. Phillips, S., & Hebb, T. (2010). Financing the third sector: Introduction/editorial. Policy and Society, 29, 181–187. Scholar
  34. Senecal, G., & McDonald, M. (2017). Mission completion, troop welfare and destructive idealism: A case study on the phenomenology of a combat veteran’s social reintegration. New Male Studies, 6(2), 64–89.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, S. (2010). Hybridization and non-profit organizations: The governance challenge. Policy and Society, 29, 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wadham, B. (2013). Brotherhood. Australian Feminist Studies, 28(76), 212–235. Scholar
  37. Wadham, B., Bridges, D., Mundkur, A., & Connor, J. (2016). ‘War-fighting and left-wing feminist agendas’: Gender and change in the Australian Defence Force. Critical Military Studies, 4(3), 264–280. Scholar
  38. Women in Defence. Women in Defence – Department of Defence. Accessed 2 July 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Griffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations