Advertisement

Towards a Software Engineering Framework for the Design, Construction and Deployment of Machine Learning-Based Solutions in Digitalization Processes

  • Ricardo Colomo-PalaciosEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

There is an increasing demand of digitalization technologies in almost all aspects in modern life. A swelling part of these technologies and solutions are based on Machine Learning technologies. As a consequence of this, there is a need to develop these solutions in a sound and solid way to increase software quality in its eight characteristics: functional suitability, reliability, performance efficiency, usability, security, compatibility, maintainability and portability. To do so, it is needed to adopt software engineering and information systems standards to support the process. This paper aims to draw the path towards a framework to support digitalization processes based on machine-learning solutions.

References

  1. 1.
    Syam, N., Sharma, A.: Waiting for a sales renaissance in the fourth industrial revolution: machine learning and artificial intelligence in sales research and practice. Ind. Mark. Manag. 69, 135–146 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.12.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marr, B.: Why Everyone Must Get Ready For The 4th Industrial Revolution. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2016/04/05/why-everyone-must-get-ready-for-4th-industrial-revolution/ (2016)
  3. 3.
    Canetta, L., Barni, A., Montini, E.: Development of a digitalization maturity model for the manufacturing sector. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), pp. 1–7 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2018.8436292
  4. 4.
    Wang, S., Wan, J., Zhang, D., Li, D., Zhang, C.: Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: a self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Comput. Netw. 101, 158–168 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2015.12.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Catlin, T., Lorenz, J.-T., Sternfels, B., Willmott, P.: A roadmap for a digital transformation| McKinsey. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/a-roadmap-for-a-digital-transformation
  9. 9.
    Bin-Abbas, H., Bakry, S.H.: Assessment of IT governance in organizations: a simple integrated approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 32, 261–267 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oliver, D., Lainhart, J.: COBIT 5: adding value through effective geit. EDPACS 46, 1–12 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2012.706472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    COBIT 5: A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT. http://www.isaca.org/cobit/
  12. 12.
    Lu, Y.: Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 6, 1–10 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oliff, H., Liu, Y.: Towards industry 4.0 utilizing data-mining techniques: a case study on quality improvement. Proc. CIRP. 63, 167–172 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miškuf, M., Zolotová, I.: Comparison between multi-class classifiers and deep learning with focus on industry 4.0. In: 2016 Cybernetics Informatics (K I), pp. 1–5 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBERI.2016.7438633
  15. 15.
    Lee, J., Davari, H., Singh, J., Pandhare, V.: Industrial artificial intelligence for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett. 18, 20–23 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Traub, M., Vögel, H., Sax, E., Streichert, T., Härri, J.: Digitalization in automotive and industrial systems. In: 2018 Design, Automation Test in Europe Conference Exhibition (DATE), pp. 1203–1204 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE.2018.8342198
  17. 17.
    Zhang, D., Tsai, J.J.P.: Machine learning and software engineering. Softw. Qual. J. 11, 87–119 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023760326768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meinke, K., Bennaceur, A.: Machine learning for software engineering: models, methods, and applications. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings, pp. 548–549. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3183440.3183461
  19. 19.
    Garcia-Crespo, A., Colomo-Palacios, R., Gomez-Berbis, J.M., Mencke, M.: BMR: benchmarking metrics recommender for personnel issues in software development projects. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 2, 257–267 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Colomo-Palacios, R., González-Carrasco, I., López-Cuadrado, J.L., Trigo, A., Varajao, J.E.: I-Competere: Using applied intelligence in search of competency gaps in software project managers. Inf. Syst. Front. 16, 607–625 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-012-9369-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Colomo-Palacios, R., González-Carrasco, I., López-Cuadrado, J.L., García-Crespo, Á.: ReSySTER: a hybrid recommender system for Scrum team roles based on fuzzy and rough sets. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 22, 801–816 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.2478/v10006-012-0059-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    The 1st International Workshop on Machine Learning and Software Engineering in Symbiosis (MASES 2018), https://mases18.github.io
  23. 23.
    Khomh, F., Adams, B., Cheng, J., Fokaefs, M., Antoniol, G.: Software engineering for machine-learning applications: the road ahead. IEEE Softw. 35, 81–84 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2018.3571224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design Research in Information Systems—Theory and Practice (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele UK Keele University, vol. 33, 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Baldassarre, M.T., Caivano, D., Pino, F.J., Piattini, M., Visaggio, G.: Harmonization of ISO/IEC 9001:2000 and CMMI-DEV: from a theoretical comparison to a real case application. Softw. Qual. J. 20, 309–335 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-011-9154-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Glaser, B.G.: Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Sociology Press (1978)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Østfold University CollegeHaldenNorway

Personalised recommendations