Advertisement

Self-Feeling pp 217-227 | Cite as

Appropriateness and Inappropriateness in Self-Interpretation

  • Gerhard Kreuch
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 107)

Abstract

This chapter explores what an appropriate self-interpretation might look like and what role self-feeling plays in this. We can distinguish four possible combinations of self-feeling and self-interpretation. First, there is an inappropriate self-feeling that associates with a corresponding self-interpretation. The case of depression can serve as an example for this. Second, an appropriate self-feeling can associate with a non-corresponding self-interpretation. Third, we can have an inappropriate self-feeling that associates with a non-corresponding self-interpretation. The case of narcissistic personality disorder can be taken as an example. Both the second and the third combination may be called cases of self-deception. The fourth possible combination consists of an appropriate self-feeling associating with a corresponding self-interpretation. This may be called authenticity. In conclusion, three types of self-relatedness can be distinguished: “normality”, “pathology”, and “authenticity”.

Literature

  1. Heidegger, M. 2006 [1927]. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  2. Kernberg, O. 1984. Severe Personality Disorders: Psychotherapeutic Strategies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Kohut, H. 1971. The Analysis of the Self: A Systematic Approach to the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  4. Pothast, U. 1988. Philosophisches Buch. Schrift unter der aus der Entfernung leitenden Frage, was es heißt, auf menschliche Weise lebendig zu sein. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1998. Lebendige Vernünftigkeit. Zur Vorbereitung eines menschenangemessenen Konzepts. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  6. Ratcliffe, M. 2005. The Feeling of Being. Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (8–10): 45–63.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2008. Feelings of Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Young, J.E., J.S. Klosko, and M.E. Weishaar. 2003. Schema Therapy: A Practitioner’s Guide. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerhard Kreuch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations