Advertisement

Modular and Reconfigurable System Design for Underwater Vehicles

  • Marc HildebrandtEmail author
  • Kenneth Schmitz
  • Rolf Drechsler
Chapter
Part of the Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering book series (ISCA, volume 96)

Abstract

The work on modular and reconfigurable system design aims to improve the usability of underwater vehicles by broadening their versatility and adaptability to new situations and scenarios. This will be achieved by a modular system design on the hardware side and a reconfigurable software system. This is necessary since current design of underwater vehicles is usually tailor-made for a specific task or completely open-frame. While the latter option is more versatile, it is nearly exclusively found in ROV systems, since an open-frame design usually comes with limited hydrodynamic optimizations, requiring strong thrusters and thus a lot of energy which can only be supplied via thether. There are some AUV systems with a modular design, but these designs usually do not incorporate the modules in the vehicles control framework: Additional modules are independent from the main vehicle control and used only for data acquisition.

References

  1. 1.
    Arun C, Kenneth S, Ulrich K, R Drechsler (2015) Ensuring safety and reliability of IP-based system design—a container approach. In: Rapid system prototyping (RSP), 2015 international symposium on, pp 76–82. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eickstedt DP, Sideleau SR (2009) The backseat control architecture for autonomous robotic vehicles: a case study with the iver2 auv. OCEANS 2009:1–8 OctGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Emmert J, Stroud C, Skaggs B, Abramovici M (2000) Dynamic fault tolerance in fpgas via partial reconfiguration. In: Field-programmable custom computing machines, 2000 IEEE symposium on, pp 165–174. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hildebrandt M, Hilljegerdes J (2010) Design of a versatile AUV for high precision visual mapping and algorithm evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE AUV monterey, MontereyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luth C, Ring M, Drechsler R (2017) Towards a methodology for self-verification. In: 2017 6th international conference on reliability, Infocom technologies and optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), pp 11–15, Sept 2017Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Noguera J, Kennedy IO (2007) Power reduction in network equipment through adaptive partial reconfiguration. In: Field programmable logic and applications, 2007. FPL 2007. international conference on, pp 240–245. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paulsson K, Hübner M, Bayar S, Becker J (2007) Exploitation of run-time partial reconfiguration for dynamic power management in xilinx spartan III-based systems. In: International symposium on reconfigurable communication-centric systems-on-chip, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sangekar M, Chitre M, Koay TB (2008) Hardware architecture for a modular autonomous underwater vehicle starfish. OCEANS 2008:1–8 SeptGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmitz K, Chandrasekharan A, Gomes Filho J, Große D, Drechsler R (2017) Trust is good, control is better: Hardware-based instruction-replacement for reliable processor-ips. In: Design automation conference (ASP-DAC), 2017 22nd Asia and South Pacific, pp 57–62. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schmitz K, Keszocze O, Schmidt J, Große D, Drechsler R (2018) Towards dynamic execution environment for system security protection against hardware flaws. In: 2018 IEEE computer society annual symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI), pp 557–562. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trimberger S, Carberry D, Johnson A, Wong J (1997) A time-multiplexed fpga. In: Proceedings, the 5th annual IEEE symposium on Field-Programmable custom computing machines, pp 22–28. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ustaoglu B, Huhn S, Große D, Drechsler R (2018) SAT-Lancer: a Hardware SAT-Solver for Self-Verification. In: 28th ACM great lakes symposium on VLSI (GLVLSI). o.A.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Hildebrandt
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kenneth Schmitz
    • 2
  • Rolf Drechsler
    • 3
  1. 1.DFKI-RICBremenGermany
  2. 2.DFKI-CPSBremenGermany
  3. 3.DFKI-CPS and University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations