Advertisement

The ‘Digital’ as Problem and Purpose in Education Policy

  • Shane B. DugganEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, Duggan extends previous work into the announcement of ‘coding in schools’ policy in Australia since 2015. Drawing on Federal Hansard records, he examines the critical debate around innovation and training, and its embedding of computer coding as a key ‘literacy of the future’ in the Australian educational landscape. This chapter provides a critical analysis of parliamentary debates, media releases, and engagements by Government and Opposition Federal Ministers to consider how the re/articulation and embedding of innovation and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education takes up an idealised notion of ‘the future’ as tech-enabled and in need of policy response to ‘the new’. The analysis highlights three lines of debate that have emerged in operationalising and responding educational policy in the wake of digital labour market disruption: first, the rise and reach of networked infrastructures into traditional modes of life and work; second, the future value of existing and proposed programmes of study; and third, the implications for resourcing in the wake of the Global Financial Crisis and uneven economic recovery. Combined, this chapter argues that whilst a policy focus on technical and instrumental skills such as computer coding may help young people to interact with dominant technologies of the present, they also risk weakening a more substantive conversation around educational participation and purpose in the present, and for the future.

Keywords

Futures Networked infrastructures Digital labour market 

References

  1. Adams, Paul. 2016. Education Policy: Explaining, Framing and Forming. Journal of Education Policy 31 (3): 290–307.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1084387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amsler, Sarah, and Keri Facer. 2017. Contesting Anticipatory Regimes in Education: Exploring Alternative Educational Orientations to the Future. Futures 94 (Nov.): 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, Stephen J. 2004. Education for Sale! The Commodification of Everything. King´s Annual Education Lecture 2004, 1–29. http://sys.glotta.ntua.gr/Dialogos/Politics/CERU-0410-253-OWI.pdf.
  4. ———. 2016. Following Policy: Networks, Education Policy Mobilities and Glocalisation. Journal of Education Policy 0939 (July): 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1122232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball, Stephen J., Carolina Junemann, and Diego Santori. 2017. Edu.Net: Globalisation and Education Policy Mobility. Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan, Rachel, Kathryn Holmes, Gregory Preston, and Kylie Shaw. 2012. Basic Literacy or New Literacies? Examining the Contradictions of Australia’s Education Revolution. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 37 (6): 97–110.  https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n6.8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Button, Kenneth, Kenneth Cox, Roger Stough, and Samantha Taylor. 2002. The Long Term Educational Needs of a High- Technology Society Technology Society. Journal of Education Policy 17 (1): 87–107.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093011010007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakravorti, Bhaskar, Christopher Tunnard, and Ravi Shankar Chaturvedi. 2015. Where the Digital Economy Is Moving the Fastest. Harvard Business Review, February 2015. https://hbr.org/2015/02/where-the-digital-economy-is-moving-the-fastest.
  9. Code.org. 2013. What Most Schools Don’t Teach, 2013.Google Scholar
  10. Duggan, Shane. 2018. Hacking the Future: Youth, Digital Disruption and the Promise of the New. In Young People and the Politics of Outrage and Hope, ed. Peter Kelly, Perri Campbell, Lyn Harrison, and Chris Hickey. Leiden: Brill.  https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004387492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2019. Examining Digital Disruption as Problem and Purpose in Australian Education Policy. The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives 18 (1): 111–127. https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/IEJ.Google Scholar
  12. Falkner, Katrina, and Rebecca Vivian. 2015. A Review of Computer Science Resources for Learning and Teaching with K-12 Computing Curricula: An Australian Case Study. Computer Science Education 25 (4): 390–429.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2016.1140410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorur, Radhika, and Margaret Wu. 2015. Leaning Too Far? PISA, Policy and Australia’s ‘Top Five’ Ambitions. Discourse 36 (5): 647–664.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.930020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gulson, Kalervo N., and P. Taylor Webb. 2017. Mapping an Emergent Field of ‘Computational Education Policy’: Policy Rationalities, Prediction and Data in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Research in Education 98 (1): 14–26.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523717723385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hay Newman, Lily, and Chris Kirk. 2016. It’s Apple’s 40th Anniversary. How Much Money Have You Given Them Over the Years? Slate, April 2016. http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2016/04/01/apple_s_40th_anniversary_how_much_old_products_cost_in_2016_dollars.html.
  16. Komatsu, Hikaru, and Jeremy Rappleye. 2017. A New Global Policy Regime Founded on Invalid Statistics? Hanushek, Woessmann, PISA, and Economic Growth. Comparative Education 53: 166–191.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1300008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewis, Steven. 2017. Governing Schooling through ‘What Works’: The OECD’s PISA for Schools. Journal of Education Policy 32 (3): 281–302.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1252855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Linder, Kathryn Elizabeth. 2011. Global Competition in a ‘Flat’ World: A Foucauldian Analysis of the Neoliberal Mentalities of 2 Million Minutes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 32 (3): 443–456.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.573260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lingard, Bob. 2010. Policy Borrowing, Policy Learning: Testing Times in Australian Schooling. Critical Studies in Education 51: 129–147.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17508481003731026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lingard, Bob, and Amanda Keddie. 2013. Redistribution, Recognition and Representation: Working against Pedagogies of Indifference. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 21 (3): 427–447.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2013.809373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lingard, Bob, and Sam Sellar. 2013. Globalization, Edu-Business and Network Governance: The Policy Sociology of Stephen J. Ball and Rethinking Education Policy Analysis. London Review of Education 11 (3): 265–280.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2013.840986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lynch, Matthew. 2018. Coding as a Literacy for the 21st Century. Education Week, January 2018. http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/education_futures/2018/01/coding_as_a_literacy_for_the_21st_century.html.
  23. McLeod, Julie, and Katie Wright. 2012. The Promise of the New: Genealogies of Youth, Nation and Educational Reform in Australia. Journal of Educational Administration & History 44 (4): 283–293.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2012.713926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. OECD. 2016. Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills. Paris.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264265097-en.
  25. Peters, Michael Adrian, Petar Jandrić, and Alexander Means. 2019. Introduction: Technological Unemployment and the Future of Work. In Education and Technological Unemployment, ed. Michael Adrian Peters, Petar Jandrić, and Alexander Means, 1–12. Singapore: Springer Singapore.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6225-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rizvi, Fazal. 2013. Equity and Marketisation: A Brief Commentary. Discourse 34 (2): 274–278.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.770252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scholz, Trebor. 2013. Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory. Edited by Trebor Scholz. New York: Routledge.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.816888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sellar, Sam, and David R. Cole. 2017. Accelerationism: A Timely Provocation for the Critical Sociology of Education. British Journal of Sociology of Education 38 (1): 38–48.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2016.1256190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Selwyn, Neil. 2015. Minding Our Language: Why Education and Technology Is Full of Bullshit... and What Might Be Done about It. Digital Innovation, Creativity & Knowledge in Education Conference 41 (3): 437–443.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1012523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ———. 2016. Is Technology Good for Education? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Shorten, Bill. 2015. Budget Reply Speech 2015, 15 May Parliament of Australia. Canberra, ACT. http://www.billshorten.com.au/budget-reply-2015.
  32. Srnicek, Nick. 2017. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  33. Standing, Guy. 2016. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. 2nd ed. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Vee, Annette. 2013. Understanding Computer Programming as a Literacy. Literacy in Composition Studies 1 (2): 42–64. https://doi.org/10.21623%2F1.1.2.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vivian, Rebecca, Katrina Falkner, and Nickolas Falkner. 2014. Addressing the Challenges of a New Digital Technologies Curriculum: MOOCs as a Scalable Solution for Teacher Professional Development. Research in Learning Technology 22 (September 2017).  https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.24691.
  36. Walsh, Lucas. 2016. Educating Generation Next: Young People, Teachers and Schooling in Transition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williamson, Ben. 2016. Political Computational Thinking: Policy Networks, Digital Governance and ‘Learning to Code’. Critical Policy Studies 10 (1): 39–58.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1052003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wolff, Ralph, and Melanie Booth. 2018. Bridging the Gap: Creating a New Approach for Assuring 21st Century Employability Skills. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 49 (6): 51–54.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2017.1399040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations