Advertisement

Assessing Diversity and Inclusion in the Context of the U.S. Federal Department of Health and Human Services

  • Annamaria PorrecaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 247)

Abstract

In recent decades, the role of diversity in organizations has been much discussed. This is because, in the literature, insiders consider that diversity has a positive impact on multiple aspects. For example, in the corporate field, they suggest that a wide diversity of workforce is associated with higher levels of profitability. Nevertheless, at a theoretical level, not all scholars consider that diversity always has a positive impact on organizations. Because an excessive diversity can also lead to internal conflicts and may favor decision-making processes, not all researchers agree that diversity has a positive effect. Indeed, empirical studies also show conflicting results due to many problems. One of the main issue is how to measure diversity because numerous studies have adopted different indices. To solve this drawback, recent studies have proposed the use of diversity profiles in the organizational field. This research proposes an empirical application of this methodology in the organizational context; in particular, diversity profiles are applied for analysing diversity and inclusion of minorities in a United States Federal Agency, i.e. the Department of Health and Human Services.

Keywords

Workforce diversity Diversity profiles Hill’s numbers Firms’ heterogeneity Diversity and inclusion 

References

  1. Aguilera, A., Aguilera-Morillo, M.C., Escabias, M., Valderrama, M.: Penalized spline approaches for functional principal component logit regression. In: Contributions to Statistics, pp. 1–7. Physica-Verlag HD (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2736-1_1Google Scholar
  2. Ararat, M., Aksu, M., Tansel Cetin, A.: How board diversity affects firm performance in emerging markets: evidence on channels in controlled firms. Corp. Gov. (Oxford) 23(2), 83–103 (2015). www.scopus.comCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barako, G., Brown, A.: Corporate social reporting and board representation: evidence from the Kenyan banking sector. J. Manag. Gov. 12(4), 309–324 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-008-9053-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barassi, G., Bellomo, R.G., Di Iulio, A., Lococo, A., Porreca, A., Di Felice, P.A., Saggini, R.: Preoperative Rehabilitation in Lung Cancer Patients: Yoga Approach, pp. 1–11. Springer, New York, NY.  https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2018_186Google Scholar
  5. Barassi, G., Bellomo, R.G., Porreca, A., Di Felice, P.A., Prosperi, L., Saggini, R.: Somato-visceral effects in the treatment of dysmenorrhea: neuromuscular manual therapy and standard pharmacological treatment. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 24(3), 291–299 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2017.0182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavallo, B., D’Apuzzo, L., Squillante, M.: A multi-criteria decision making method for sustainable development of Naples port city-area. Qual. Quant. 49(4), 1647–1659 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi, S., Rainey, H.G.: Managing diversity in U.S. Federal Agencies: effects of diversity and diversity management on employee perceptions of organizational performance. Public Admin. Rev., 70(1), 109–121 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02115.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cybercareers.gov. Managerial & Executive Development (2016). https://www.cybercareers.gov/
  9. Di Battista, T., Fortuna, F., Maturo, F.: BioFTF: an R package for biodiversity assessment with the functional data analysis approach. Ecol. Indic. 73, 726–732 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Di Spalatro, D., Maturo, F., Sicuro, L.: Inequalities in the Provinces of Abruzzo: a comparative study through the indices of deprivation and principal component analysis. In: Mathematical-Statistical Models and Qualitative Theories for Economic and Social Sciences, pp. 219–231. Springer (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54819-7_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. European Commission: Diversity within small and medium-sized enterprises—best practices and approaches for moving ahead. Brussels (2015)Google Scholar
  12. Ferraty, F.: Recent Advances in Functional Data Analysis and Related Topics. Physica-Verlag HD (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2736-1zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Fortuna, F., Maturo, F., Di Battista, T.: Clustering functional data streams: unsupervised classification of soccer top players based on Google trends. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 1–25 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1002/QRE-17-0561
  14. Hahn, P., Lasfer, M.: Impact of foreign directors on board meeting frequency. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 46, 295–308 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.11.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harrison, D.A., Klein, K.J.: What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(4), 1199–1228 (2007). www.scopus.comCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hill, M.: Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54, 427–432 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hošková-Mayerová, Š., Talhofer, V., Hofmann, A.: Decision-Making Process with Respect to the Reliability of Geo-Database, pp. 179–194. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35635-3_15. ISBN 978-3-642-35635-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kellough, J.E.: Integration in the public workplace: determinants of minority and female employment in federal agencies. Public Admin. Rev. 50(5), 557 (1990).  https://doi.org/10.2307/976786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koh, H.K., Graham, G., Glied, S.A.: Reducing racial and ethnic disparities: the action plan from the department of health and human services. Health Aff. 30(10), 1822–1829 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Longo, A., Squillante, M., Ventre, A., Ventre, V.: The intertemporal choice behaviour the role of emotions in a multi-agent decision problem. AAPP Atti della Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti, Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali 93(2), C2–C14 (2015)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Maturo, F.: Unsupervised classification of ecological communities ranked according to their biodiversity patterns via a functional principal component decomposition of Hill’s numbers integral functions. Ecol. Indic. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maturo, F., Di Battista, T.: A functional approach to Hill’s numbers for assessing changes in species variety of ecological communities over time. Ecol. Indic. 84, 70–81 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.016. ISSN 1470-160XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maturo, F., Balzanella, A., Di Battista, T.: Building statistical indicators of equitable and sustainable well-being in a functional framework. Soc. Ind. Res. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02137-5
  24. Maturo, F., Migliori, S., Paolone, F.: Do Institutional or Foreign Shareholders Influence National Board Diversity? Assessing Board Diversity Through Functional Data Analysis, pp. 199–217. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54819-7_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maturo, F., Fortuna, F., Battista, T.D.: Testing equality of functions across multiple experimental conditions for different ability levels in the IRT context: the case of the IPRASE TLT 2016 survey. Soc. Indic. Res. (2018a). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1893-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maturo, F., Migliori, S., Paolone, F.: Measuring and monitoring diversity in organizations through functional instruments with an application to ethnic workforce diversity of the U.S. Federal agencies. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 24(2) (2018b).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-018-9267-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olivieri, M., Squillante, M., Ventre, V.: Information and intertemporal choices in multi-agent decision problems. Ratio Math. 31(1), 3–24 (2016). ISSN 2282-8214Google Scholar
  28. Patil, G., Taillie, C.: An overview of diversity. In: Grassle, J., Patil, G., Smith, W., Taillie, C. (eds.) Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice, pp. 23–48. International Co-operative Publishing House, Fairland, MD (1979)Google Scholar
  29. Rambaud, S.C., Pérez, A.M.S.: Valuation of barrier options with the binomial pricing model. Ratio Math. 31(1), 25–35 (2016). ISSN 2282-8214Google Scholar
  30. Ramsay, J., Hooker, G., Graves, S.: Introduction to functional data analysis. In: Functional Data Analysis with R and MATLAB, pp. 1–19. Springer, New York (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98185-7_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ruigrok, W., Peck, S., Tacheva, S.: Nationality and gender diversity on Swiss corporate boards. Corp. Gov.: Int. Rev. 15(4), 546–557 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00587.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shannon, C.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423 (1948)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shehata, N.F.: How could board diversity influence corporate disclosure? Corp. Board 9(3) (2013).  https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv9i3art4
  34. Simpson, E.: Measurement of diversity. Nature 163, 688 (1949)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Urban, R., Šarka Hošková-Mayerová, J.D.: Central Eur. J. Reg. Dev. Tour. 9(2), 93–109 (2017)Google Scholar
  36. van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M.C.: Work group diversity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58(1), 515–541 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics“G. D’ Annunzio” University of Chieti-PescaraChietiItaly

Personalised recommendations