Advertisement

Concluding Remarks

  • Dejan RadojčićEmail author
  • Milan Kalajdžić
  • Aleksandar Simić
Chapter

Abstract

As stated in the Introduction, MM development is an evolutionary process. Namely, new MMs are expected to be better than the previous ones.

References

  1. Bertram V, Mesbahi E. (2004) Estimating resistance and power of fast monohulls employing artificial neural nets. In: International conference on High Performance Marine Vehicles (HIPER), RomeGoogle Scholar
  2. Blount DL (2014) Performance by design. ISBN 0-978-9890837-1-3Google Scholar
  3. Blount DL, Fox DL (1976) Small craft power prediction. Mar Technol 13(1)Google Scholar
  4. Blount DL, Fox DL (1978) Design considerations for propellers in cavitating environment. Mar Technol 15(2)Google Scholar
  5. Blount DL, Hubble EN (1981) Sizing Segmental section commercially available propellers for small craft. In: Propellers ’81 symposium, SNAME, Virginia BeachGoogle Scholar
  6. Couser P, Mason A, Mason G, Smith CR, von Konsky BR (2004) Artificial neural network for hull resistance prediction. In: 3rd international conference on Computer and IT Applications in the Maritime Industries (COMPIT ’04), SiguenzaGoogle Scholar
  7. Doust DJ (1960) Statistical analysis of resistance data for trawlers. Fishing Boats of the World: 2 Fishing News (Books) Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Farlie-Clarke AC (1975) Regression analysis of ship data. Int Shipbuilding Prog 22(251)Google Scholar
  9. Fung SC (1991) Resistance and powering prediction for transom stern hull forms during early stage ship design. SNAME Trans 99Google Scholar
  10. Hadler JB (1966) The prediction of power performance of planing craft. SNAME Trans 74Google Scholar
  11. Holtrop J, Mennen GGJ (1982) An approximate power prediction method. Int Shipbuilding Prog 29(335)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koushan K (2005) Mathematical expressions of thrust and torque of newton-rader propeller series for high speed crafts using artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on Fast Sea Transportation (FAST 2005), St. PetersburgGoogle Scholar
  13. Koushan K (2007) Mathematical expressions of thrust and torque of Gawn-Burrill propeller series for high speed crafts using artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings of 9th international conference on Fast Sea Transportation (FAST 2007), ShanghaiGoogle Scholar
  14. Mercier JA, Savitsky D (1973) Resistance of transom-stern craft in the pre-planing regime. Davidson Laboratory Report 1667Google Scholar
  15. Müller-Graf B, Radojčić D, Simić A (2003) Resistance and propulsion characteristics of the VWS hard chine catamaran hull Series ’89. SNAME Trans 110Google Scholar
  16. Oosterveld MWC, van Oossanen P (1975) Further computer-analyzed data of the Wageningen B-screw series. Int Shipbuilding Prog 22(251)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Radojčić D (1985) An approximate method for calculation of resistance and trim of the planing hulls. University of Southampton, Ship Science Report No. 23. Paper presented on SNAME Symposium on Powerboats, September 1985Google Scholar
  18. Radojčić D (1988) Mathematical model of segmental section propeller series for open-water and cavitating conditions applicable in CAD. In: Propellers ’88 symposium, SNAME, Virginia BeachGoogle Scholar
  19. Radojčić D (1991) An engineering approach to predicting the hydrodynamic performance of planing craft using computer techniques. RINA Trans 133Google Scholar
  20. Radojčić D, Kalajdžić M (2018) Resistance and trim modeling of naples hard chine systematic series. RINA Trans Int J Small Craft Technol.  https://doi.org/10.3940/rina.ijsct.2018.b1.211
  21. Radojčić D, Rodić T, Kostić N (1997) Resistance and trim predictions for the NPL high speed round bilge displacement hull series. In: RINA conference on Power, Performance and Operability of Small Craft, SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
  22. Radojčić D, Zgradić A, Kalajdžić M, Simić A (2014a) Resistance prediction for hard chine hulls in the pre-planing regime. Pol Mar Res 21(2(82)) (Gdansk)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Radojčić D, Morabito M, Simić A, Zgradić A (2014b) Modeling with regression analysis and artificial neural networks the resistance and trim of Series 50 experiments with V-bottom motor boats. J Ship Prod Des 30(4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Radojčić DV, Zgradić AB, Kalajdžić MD, Simić AP (2017a) Resistance and trim modeling of systematic planing hull Series 62 (with 12.5, 25 and 30 degrees deadrise angles) using artificial neural networks, Part 1: the database. J Ship Prod Des 33(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Radojčić DV, Kalajdžić MD, Zgradić AB, Simić AP (2017b) Resistance and trim modeling of systematic planing hull Series 62 (with 12.5, 25 and 30 degrees deadrise angles) using artificial neural networks, Part 2: mathematical models. J Ship Prod Des 33(4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Savitsky D (1964) Hydrodynamic design of planing hulls. Mar Technol 1(1)Google Scholar
  27. Van Oortmerssen G (1971) A power prediction method and its application to small ships. Int Shipbuilding Prog 18Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dejan Radojčić
    • 1
    Email author
  • Milan Kalajdžić
    • 2
  • Aleksandar Simić
    • 3
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering, Department of Naval ArchitectureUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering, Department of Naval ArchitectureUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  3. 3.Mechanical Engineering, Department of Naval ArchitectureUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations