Objectivity and Interpretation in Fact-Checking Journalism

  • Jen BirksEmail author


This chapter outlines the tensions between fact-checking journalism and the dominant epistemological norms and practices of ‘objective’ journalism to explain why elements of fact-checking practice can be controversial. Whilst scientific objectivity is associated with facticity or truth, as a journalistic norm it is understood only as avoiding subjective bias, and operationalised through direct quotation, distancing the journalistic voice. Verification is therefore typically limited to names, dates, places and accurate transcription. Fact-checking, in contrast, involves verifying the substance of sources’ claims, and can therefore be criticised as too interpretive, subjective and biased, criticisms that aim to draw narrow bounds around the legitimate ground for fact-checking.


Fact-checking Journalism Objectivity Interpretation Verification Epistemology 


  1. Allan, Stuart. 2002. Media, Risk and Science (Open University Press: Buckingham).Google Scholar
  2. Amazeen, Michelle A. 2015. ‘Revisiting the Epistemology of Fact-checking’, Critical Review, 27: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amazeen, Michelle A. 2016. ‘Checking the Fact-checkers in 2008: Predicting Political Ad Scrutiny and Assessing Consistency’, Journal of Political Marketing, 15: 433–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amazeen, Michelle A., Emily Thorson, Ashley Muddiman, and Lucas Graves. 2015. ‘A Comparison of Correction Formats: The Effectiveness and Effects of Rating Scale Versus Contextual Corrections on Misinformation’, American Press Institute, Accessed 21 December 2018.
  5. Ball, James. 2017. Post-Truth: How Bullshit Conquered the World (Biteback Publishing: London).Google Scholar
  6. BBC Election Debate (31/05/2017) - BBC, available from:
  7. Birks, Jen. 2019. ‘Fact-checking, False Balance, and “Fake News”: The Discourse and Practice of Verification in Political Communication.’ In Stuart Price (ed.), Journalism, Power and Investigation: Global and Activist Perspectives (Routledge: London).Google Scholar
  8. Blumler, Jay, and Michael Gurevitch. 1995. The Crisis of Public Communication (Psychology Press: London).Google Scholar
  9. Brecknell, Suzannah. 2016. ‘Interview: Full Fact’s Will Moy on Lobbyist “Nonsense”, Official Corrections and Why We Know More About Golf than Crime Stats’, Civil Service World, Accessed 21 December 2018.
  10. Chadwick, Andrew, Cristian Vaccari, and Ben O’Loughlin. 2018. ‘Do Tabloids Poison the Well of Social Media? Explaining Democratically Dysfunctional News Sharing’, New Media & Society, 20: 4255–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cushion, Stephen, Justin Lewis, and Robert Callaghan. 2017. ‘Data Journalism, Impartiality and Statistical Claims’, Journalism Practice, 11: 1198–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, Evan. 2017. Post-Truth: Why We Have Reached Peak Bullshit and What We Can Do About It (Little, Brown: London).Google Scholar
  13. Dobbs, Michael. 2012. ‘The Rise of Political Fact-checking, How Reagan Inspired a Journalistic Movement’, New America Foundation, Accessed 21 December 2018.
  14. Domke, David, Mark D. Watts, Dhavan V. Shah, and David P. Fan. 2006. ‘The Politics of Conservative Elites and the “Liberal Media” Argument’, Journal of Communication, 49: 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edelman. 2019. ‘Edelman Trust Barometer Report’, Accessed 30 May 2019.
  16. Ettema, James S., and Theodore Glasser. 1998. Custodians of Conscience: Investigative Journalism and Public Virtue (Columbia University Press: New York, NY).Google Scholar
  17. Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis (Routledge: Abingdon).Google Scholar
  18. Flynn, D. J., Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler. 2017. ‘The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics’, Political Psychology, 38: 127–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fridkin, Kim, Patrick J. Kenney, and Amanda Wintersieck. 2015. ‘Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire: How Fact-checking Influences Citizens’ Reactions to Negative Advertising’, Political Communication, 32: 127–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gans, Herbert J. 2004. Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time (Northwestern University Press: Evanston, IL).Google Scholar
  21. Garrett, R. Kelly, Erik C. Nisbet, and Emily K. Lynch. 2013. ‘Undermining the Corrective Effects of Media-Based Political Fact Checking? The Role of Contextual Cues and Naïve Theory’, Journal of Communication, 63: 617–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Golshan, Tara. 2016. ‘The Importance of Fact-checking the Debate in Real Time, According to an Expert’, Vox, Accessed 21 December 2018.
  23. Gottfried, Jeffrey A., Bruce W. Hardy, Kenneth M. Winneg, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2013. ‘Did Fact Checking Matter in the 2012 Presidential Campaign?’, American Behavioral Scientist, 57: 1558–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graves, Lucas. 2016. Deciding What’s True: The Rise of Political Fact-checking in American Journalism (Columbia University Press: New York, NY).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graves, Lucas. 2017. ‘The Monitorial Citizen in the “Democratic Recession”’, Journalism Studies, 18: 1239–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Graves, Lucas. 2018. ‘Boundaries Not Drawn’, Journalism Studies, 19: 613–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Graves, Lucas, and Federica Cherubini. 2016. The Rise of Fact-checking Sites in Europe (Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism: Oxford).Google Scholar
  28. Graves, Lucas, Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler. 2016. ‘Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-checking’, Journal of Communication, 66: 102–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hafez, Kai. 2002. ‘Journalism Ethics Revisited: A Comparison of Ethics Codes in Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, and Muslim Asia’, Political Communication, 19: 225–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hall, Stuart, Chas Critcher, Tony Jefferson, John Clarke, and Brian Roberts. 1978. Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order (Macmillan: London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hanitzsch, Thomas, Folker Hanusch, Claudia Mellado, Maria Anikina, Rosa Berganza, Incilay Cangoz, Mihai Coman, Basyouni Hamada, María Elena Hernández, Christopher D. Karadjov, Sonia Virginia Moreira, Peter G. Mwesige, Patrick Lee Plaisance, Zvi Reich, Josef Seethaler, Elizabeth A. Skewes, Dani Vardiansyah Noor, and Edgar Kee Wang Yuen. 2011. ‘Mapping Journalism Cultures Across Nations’, Journalism Studies, 12: 273–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Herman, Edward S., and Noam Chomsky. 2002. Manufacturing Consent (Pantheon Books: New York, NY).Google Scholar
  33. James, Sam Burne. 2014. ‘Full Fact Gains Charitable Status Five Years After First Application’, Third Sector, Accessed 21 December 2018.
  34. Kessler, Glenn, Michelle Ye Hee Lee, and Meg Kelly. 2017. ‘President Trump’s First Six Months: The Fact-check Tally’, Washington Post Fact Checker, Accessed 29 August 2017.
  35. Lebo, Matthew J., and Daniel Cassino. 2007. ‘The Aggregated Consequences of Motivated Reasoning and the Dynamics of Partisan Presidential Approval’, Political Psychology, 28: 719–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee, Dave. 2019. ‘Key Fact-checkers Stop Working with Facebook’, BBC News, Accessed 30 May 2019.
  37. Lowrey, Wilson. 2017. ‘The Emergence and Development of News Fact-checking Sites’, Journalism Studies, 18: 376–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Merritt, Davis. 1995. ‘Public Journalism and Public Life’, National Civic Review, 84: 262–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muñoz-Torres, Juan Ramón. 2012. ‘Truth and Objectivity in Journalism’, Journalism Studies, 13: 566–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Newman, Nic, Richard Fletcher, Antonis Kalogeropoulos, David A. L. Levy, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2018. ‘Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018’, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Accessed 21 December 2018.
  41. Nyhan, Brendan, and Jason Reifler. 2010. ‘When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions’, Political Behavior, 32: 303–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nyhan, Brendan, Jason Reifler, and Peter A. Ubel. 2013. ‘The Hazards of Correcting Myths About Health Care Reform’, Medical Care, 51: 127–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. PEN America. 2017. ‘Faking News: Fraudulent News and the Fight for Truth’, PEN, Accessed 21 December 2018.
  44. Schlesinger, Philip, and Howard Tumber. 1994. Reporting Crime: The Media Politics of Criminal Justice (Clarendon Press: Oxford).Google Scholar
  45. Schudson, Michael. 2008. Why Democracies Need an Unlovable Press (Polity: London).Google Scholar
  46. Shapiro, Ivor, Colette Brin, Isabelle Bédard-Brûlé, and Kasia Mychajlowycz. 2013. ‘Verification as a Strategic Ritual’, Journalism Practice, 7: 657–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Singer, Jane B. 2018. ‘Fact-checkers as Entrepreneurs: Scalability and Sustainability for a New Form of Watchdog Journalism’, Journalism Practice, 12: 1070–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. The Battle for Number 10 (29/05/2017) - Sky News / Channel 4 News, available from:
  49. Tuchman, Gaye. 1978. Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality (Free Press: New York, NY).Google Scholar
  50. Underwood, Doug. 1988. ‘When MBAs Rule the Newsroom’, Columbia Journalism Review, 26: 23.Google Scholar
  51. Uscinski, Joseph E. 2015. ‘The Epistemology of Fact Checking (Is Still Naìve): Rejoinder to Amazeen’, Critical Review, 27: 243–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Uscinski, Joseph E., and Ryden W. Butler. 2013. ‘The Epistemology of Fact Checking’, Critical Review, 25: 162–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2003. ‘The Development of the Pragma-dialectical Approach to Argumentation’, Argumentation, 17: 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walton, Douglas. 2006. Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cultural, Media & Visual StudiesUniversity of Nottingham, University ParkNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations