Advertisement

The Visitor, the Wanderer and the Migrant

  • Alison ButlerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Close Readings in Film and Television book series (CRFT)

Abstract

The cinema viewer is described as a spectator, whereas the viewer in a gallery or museum is a visitor. Stationary and wandering figures onscreen provide a reference point in the landscape and a mirror image of the visitor in the gallery, suggesting a mode of address based on location and movement in space. Film theorists and art historians have drawn on phenomenology and neuropsychology in their accounts of embodied viewing, but few have done so from a perspective that takes account of cultural identity. This chapter explores viewing relationships in a group of works that are structured by cultural perspectives that are neither white nor putatively unmarked. Thematically, the figures in these works often appear as strangers, travellers and migrants. Through a range of examples, including John Akomfrah’s The Airport (2016), Yang Fudong’s The Fifth Night (2010), and Isaac Julien’s Ten Thousand Waves (2010), I explore the use of motionless and wandering figures in multi-screen works to provide structure, coherence and a point of view for the visitor, and to thematise mobility and migration.

References

  1. Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology: Objects, Orientations, Others. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alter, Nora. 2018. The Essay Film After Fact and Fiction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  3. An, Ho Rui. 2013. ‘The Orient That May or May Not Arrive: Yang Fudong’s The Fifth Night.’ In Yang Fudong, edited by Phillippe Pirotte and Beatrix Ruf, 135–138. Zurich: JRP Ringier.Google Scholar
  4. Balsom, Erika. 2013. Exhibiting Cinema in Contemporary Art. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barker, Jennifer. 2009. The Tactile Eye: Touch and the Cinematic Experience. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: California University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bellour, Raymond. 2018. ‘The Quarrel of the Dispositifs: Reprise.’ Senses of Cinema, 86. Online at http://sensesofcinema.com/2018/cinema-and-the-museum/the-quarrel-of-the-dispositifs/. Accessed 1 December 2018.
  7. Berry, Chris. 2014. ‘The New Gestural Cinema: Yang Fudong and the Gallery Film.’ Film Quarterly 67 (3): 17–29.Google Scholar
  8. Blanke, Olaf, Bigna Lenggenhager, and Tej Tadi Thomas Metzinger. 2007. ‘Video Ergo Sum: Manipulating Bodily Self-Consciousness.’ Science 317 (5841): 1096–1099.Google Scholar
  9. Chinnery, Colin. 2013. ‘Identity and Authenticity: Yang Fudong’s Work and Contemporary China.’ In Yang Fudong, edited by Phillippe Pirotte and Beatrix Ruf, 131–134. Zurich: JRP Ringier.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, Ashley. 2016. ‘“We Will Be Fine. We Will Absolutely Be Fine”: A Conversation with Artist and Filmmaker John Akomfrah.’ Filmmaker Magazine. Online at https://filmmakermagazine.com/99122-we-will-be-fine-we-will-absolutely-be-fine-a-conversation-with-artist-filmmaker-john-akomfrah/#.XFRpfs_7T_Q. Accessed 1 December 2018.
  11. Connery, Christopher. 2010. ‘Shanghai Waves.’ In Ten Thousand Waves, edited by Isaac Julien, 6–11. London: Victoria Miro.Google Scholar
  12. Deleuze, Gilles. 1989. Cinema 2: The Time Image. Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, Mark. 2012. ‘What Is Hauntology?’ Film Quarterly 66 (1): 16–24.Google Scholar
  14. Gallese, Vittorio. 2017. ‘The Empathic Body in Experimental Aesthetics—Embodied Simulation and Art.’ In Empathy: Epistemic Problems and Cultural-Historical Perspectives of a Cross-Disciplinary Project, edited by Vanessa Lux and Sigrid Weigel, 181–199. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Haladyn, Julian Jason. 2016. ‘Friedrich’s Wanderer: Paradox of the Modern Subject.’ RACAR: Revue d’art canadienne 41 (1): 47–61.Google Scholar
  16. Hansen, Mark B. N. 2004. New Philosophy for New Media. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Houwen, Janna. 2016. ‘An Empty Table and an Empty Boat: Empathic Encounters with Refugee Experiences in Intermedial Installation Art.’ American, British and Canadian Studies 27 (1): 44–73.Google Scholar
  18. Julien, Isaac, and Cynthia Rose. 2014. ‘Planet.’ In Riot, edited by Isaac Julien and Cynthia Rose, 166–176. New York: Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
  19. Livesy, Joseph. 2014. ‘Wave After Wave After Wave: The Multi-Channel Immersion of Isaac Julien’s Ten Thousand Waves.Film Quarterly 67 (4): 26–32.Google Scholar
  20. Marks, Laura U. 2000. The Skin of the Film: Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Morse, Margaret. 1990. ‘Video Installation Art: the Body, the Image and the Space-In-Between.’ In Illuminating Video: An Essential Guide to Video Art, edited by Doug Hall and Sally Jo Fifer, 153–167. New York: Aperture Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Mulvey, Laura. 2014. ‘Ten Thousand Waves.’ In Riot, edited by Isaac Julien and Cynthia Rose, 200–210. New York: Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
  23. Païni, Dominique. 2000. ‘The Return of the Flâneur.’ Art Press 255, 33–41.Google Scholar
  24. Ravetto-Biagioli, Kriss. 2016. ‘The Digital Uncanny and Ghost Effects.’ Screen 57 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
  25. Rutherford, Anne. 2014. ‘Moving Image Installation, the Embodied Spectator of Cinema and Amar Kanwar: Learning from Intermediality.’ New Cinemas: Journal of Contemporary Film 12 (3): 225–238.Google Scholar
  26. Silverman, Kaja. 1988. The Acoustic Mirror: The Female Voice in Psychoanalysis and Cinema. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Sobchack, Vivian. 1992. The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wang, Ping. 2010. ‘Small Boat.’ In Ten Thousand Waves edited by Isaac Julien, 90–91. London: Victoria Miro.Google Scholar
  29. Wilder, Ken. 2014. ‘Filmic Bodies: Transgressing Boundaries Between Filmic and Real Space.’ Architecture and Culture 2 (3): 361–377.Google Scholar
  30. Yacavone, Daniel. 2016. ‘Film and the Phenomenology of Art: Reappraising Merleau-Ponty on Cinema as Form, Medium, and Expression.’ New Literary History 47 (1): 159–185.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Film, Theatre & TelevisionUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations