Advertisement

Philanthropic Wine Firms and Their CSR Communication

  • Rosana Fuentes FernándezEmail author
  • Joshua Aboah
Chapter

Abstract

Philanthropy involves voluntarily donating a business’s resources to others and is a growing practice in the wine industry. Wineries are motivated to engage in philanthropic activities for different reasons, and these motivations lead to decisions about how to communicate philanthropic activity to stakeholders, also referred to as corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication. This chapter reviews the literature pertaining to philanthropy and CSR communication. An examination of whether philanthropically active wine firms are communicating their actions to stakeholders, and if so, the media channels used, is discussed. Quantitative data was collected from wine firms in France, Spain, the USA, Australia and New Zealand using an online questionnaire.

Keywords

Philanthropy CSR communication Wine Media channels 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the efforts of the academics that collected data on philanthropy in their nation’s wine industries that is reported herein: Armando Corsi (Australia), Armand Gilinsky Jr. (USA), Coralie Haller (France) and Sharon Forbes (New Zealand).

References

  1. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S., & Korschun, D. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 37–44.Google Scholar
  3. Birth, G., Illia, L., Lurati, F., & Zamparini, A. (2008). Communicating CSR: Practices among Switzerland’s top 300 companies. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 13(2), 182–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booth, N., & Matic, J. A. (2011). Mapping and leveraging influencers in social media to shape corporate brand perceptions. Corporate Communications, 16(3), 184–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bortree, D. S. (2014). The state of CSR communication research: A summary and future direction. Journal of Public Relations, 8(3), 1–8.Google Scholar
  6. Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese banks: A legitimacy theory perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(3), 232–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capriotti, P., & Moreno, A. (2007). Corporate citizenship and public relations: The importance and interactivity of social responsibility issues on corporate websites. Public Relations Review, 33(1), 84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chalmeta, R., & Viinikka, H. (2017). Corporate philanthropy communication on donor websites. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 15(1), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cone. (2007). Cause evolution survey. Available from www.coneinc.com/content1091.
  11. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relationship rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forbes, S. L., Fuentes-Fernández, R., & Gilinsky, A. (2018). An exploratory examination of philanthropy in the New Zealand, Spanish and US wine industries. Wine Economics and Policy, 7(1), 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galati, A., Sakka, G., Crescimanno, M., Tulone, A., & Fiore, M. (2019). What is the role of social media in several overtones of CSR communication? The case of the wine industry in the Southern Italian regions. British Food Journal, 121(4), 856–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilinsky, A., Jr., Forbes, S. L., & Fuentes-Fernández, R. (2018). An exploratory study of wine business philanthropy in the USA. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 30(2), 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gjolberg, M. (2009). Measuring the immeasurable? Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greer, C. F., & Moreland, K. D. (2007). How Fortune 500 companies used the web for philanthropic and crisis communication following Hurricane Katrina. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 214–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoffmann, C., Szolnoki, G., & Thach, L. (2016). Cross-cultural comparison of social media usage in the wine industry: Differences between the United States and Germany. In G. Szolnoki, L. Thach, & D. Kolb (Eds.), Successful social media and ecommerce strategies in the wine industry (pp. 154–166). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management—New perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1–2), 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jahdi, K. S., & Acikdilli, G. (2009). Marketing communication and corporate social responsibility: Marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim, S., & Ferguson, A. T. (2014). Public expectations of CSR communication: What and how to communicate CSR. Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 1–22.Google Scholar
  22. Knox, S., Maklan, S., & French, P. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Exploring stakeholder relationships and programme reporting across leading FTSE companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lahdesmaki, M., & Takala, T. (2012). Altruism in business—An empirical study of philanthropy in the small business context. Social Responsibility Journal, 8(3), 373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maas, K., & Liket, K. (2011). Talk the walk: Measuring the impact of strategic philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 445–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moir, L., & Taffler, R. (2004). Does corporate philanthropy exist? Business giving to the arts in the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morsing, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto-communication: On the role of external stakeholders for member identification. Business Ethics: a European Review, 15(2), 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mueller-Loose, S., & Remaud, H. (2013). Impact of corporate social responsibility claims on consumer food choice: A cross-cultural comparison. British Food Journal, 115(1), 142–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palazzo, B. (2002). US-German business ethics: An intercultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(3), 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Patino, A., Pitta, D. A., & Quinones, R. (2012). Social media’s emerging importance in market research. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(3), 233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Payton, R. L. (1988). Philanthropy: Voluntary action for the public good. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.Google Scholar
  32. Saiia, D. H., Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2003). Philanthropy as a strategy: When corporate charity “begins at home”. Business and Society, 42(2), 169–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schmeltz, L. (2012). Consumer-oriented CSR communication: Focusing on ability or morality? Corporate Communications: an International Journal, 17(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stricker, S., Summer, D. A., & Mueller, R. A. E. (2003). Wine on the web in a global market: A comparison of ecommerce readiness and use in Australia, California and Germany. Paper presented at EFITA Conference, July 5–9, Debrecen, Hungary.Google Scholar
  36. Surroca, J., Tribo, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Szolnoki, G., Dolan, R., Forbes, S., Thach, L., & Goodman, S. (2018). Using social media for consumer interaction: An international comparison of winery adoption and activity. Wine Economics and Policy, 7(2), 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tata, J., & Prasad, S. (2015). CSR communication: An impression management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 765–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wanderley, L. S. O., Lucian, R., Farache, F., & de Sousa Filho, J. M. (2008). CSR information disclosure on the web: A context-based approach analysing the influence of country of origin and industry sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wartick, S. L., & Wood, D. J. (1998). International business and society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Yan, J. (2011). Social media in branding: Fulfilling a need. Journal of Brand Management, 18(9), 688–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zadek, S. (2006). Responsible competitiveness: Reshaping global markets through responsible business practices. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 334–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ziek, P. (2009). Making sense of CSR communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(3), 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Advertising and Public RelationsUniversidad San JorgeZaragozaSpain
  2. 2.Faculty of Agribusiness and CommerceLincoln UniversityChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations