Advertisement

A Short Review of Electromagnetic Force Models for Matter - Theory and Experimental Evidence

  • Wilhelm RickertEmail author
  • Wolfgang Müller
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Structured Materials book series (STRUCTMAT, volume 100)

Abstract

From Maxwell’s equations balance laws for the electromagnetic linearmomentum, angular momentum, and energy can be found after recasting and usingseveral identities of vector calculus. Therefore, the obtained equations are not “newresults” but rather identities having the form of a balance law. However, there is some degree of freedom, (a) during construction of a particular identity and (b) for the choice of the to-be-balanced quantity, the non-convective flux, and the production term. In short, one is insecure which of the various forms is correct under which circumstances. This conundrum is referred to as the Abraham-Minkowski controversy, who first proposed different expressions for the electromagnetic linear momentum. The proper choice of electromagnetic force and torque expressions is of particular importance in matter where the mechanical and electromagnetic fields couple. The question arises as to whether a comparison between the predicted deformation behavior and the observed one can help to decide which electromagnetic force model is suitable for a material of interest. In this paper we shall briefly review the controversy and suggest new approaches for its solution on the continuum level.

Keywords

Electromagnetic force models Magnetostriction Electrostriction Total forces and torques 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham M (1909) Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo (1884-1940) 28(1):1–28Google Scholar
  2. Einstein A, Laub J (1908) Über die im elektromagnetischen Felde auf ruhende Körper ausgeübten ponderomotorischen Kräfte. Annalen der Physik 331(8):541–550Google Scholar
  3. Minkowski H (1910) Die Grundgleichungen für die elektromagnetischen Vorgänge in bewegten Körpern. Mathematische Annalen 68(4):472–525Google Scholar
  4. Müller I (1985) Thermodynamics. Interaction of Mechanics and Mathematics Series, PitmanGoogle Scholar
  5. Müller WH (2014) An Expedition to Continuum Theory. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Reich FA, Rickert W, Müller WH (2018) An investigation into electromagnetic force models: differences in global and local effects demonstrated by selected problems. Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics 30(2):233–266Google Scholar
  7. Rickert W, Müller WH (2019) Dynamics of spherical magnets. Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics (in preparation)Google Scholar
  8. Rickert W, Reich FA, Müller WH (2019) An examination of elastic deformation predictions of polarizable media due to various electromagnetic force models. Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics (in preparation)Google Scholar
  9. Torza S, Cox RG, Mason SG (1971) Electrohydrodynamic deformation and burst of liquid drops. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 269(1198):295–319Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Mechanik, Kontinuumsmechanik und MaterialtheorieTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations