Advertisement

Intermediate Discussion on Determinants of State Reactance

  • Patrick EhrenbrinkEmail author
Chapter
Part of the T-Labs Series in Telecommunication Services book series (TLABS)

Abstract

This chapter provides a discussion on the results and weaknesses of the Smart TV Study and the Persuasive Assistant Study. It is discussed if the postulated Hypotheses are supported by the observed data or not.

References

  1. 1.
    Bortz, J.: Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brehm, J.W.: A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Academic Press, New York (1966)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ghazali, A.S., Ham, J., Barakova, E., Markopoulos, P.: The influence of social cues in persuasive social robots on psychological reactance and compliance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 87, 58–65 (2018). 10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.016. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563218302425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quick, B.L., Stephenson, M.T.: Examining the role of trait reactance and sensation seeking on perceived threat, state reactance, and reactance restoration. Hum. Commun. Res. 34(3), 448–476 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00328.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stadtler, T.: Lexikon der Psychologie. Alfred Kroner Verlag (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Werder (Havel)Germany

Personalised recommendations