AEB Control Strategy and Collision Analysis Considering the Human-Vehicle-Road Environment

  • Xunyi Li
  • Jinju ShaoEmail author
  • Guo Wei
  • Ruhong Hou
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1080)


Automatic emergency braking System (AEB) is one of key technologies of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). In order to avoid and reduce the occurrence of rear-end collision accidents. This paper analyzes the motion state of the target vehicle, taking into account the driver’s reaction time and real road conditions. And this paper considers the influence of road adhesion coefficient on braking distance. In this paper, the logic rule of AEB is established. Through simulation experiment, the AEB rule is verified for the reliability on different pavements. It enables AEB to adapt to most road conditions and people with different personalities. The performance of traditional autonomous emergency braking system has been improved. The new AEB rule guarantees the safety of longitudinal driving by braking warning and participating in braking at the right time.


Autonomous emergency braking Human-vehicle-road Vehicle safety braking distance 


  1. 1.
    Segata, M., Locigno, R.: Automatic emergency braking: realistic analysis of car dynamics and network performance. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 62(9), 4150–4161 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    European New Car Assessment Program (Euro-NCAP). Test protocol - AEB system version 1.0. Brussels: Euro-NCAP. Accessed 25 May 2019
  3. 3.
    Fildes, B., et al.: Effectiveness of low speed autonomous emergency braking in real-world rear-end crashes. Accid. Anal. Prev. 81, 24–29 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maurer, M.: Forward collision warning and avoidance. In: Eskandarian, A. (ed.) Handbook of Intelligent Vehicles, pp. 657–687. Springer, London (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sander, U., Lubbe, N.: The potential of clustering methods to define intersection test scenarios: assessing real-life performance of AEB. Accid. Anal. Prev. 113, 1–11 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ando, K., Matsui, Y., Tanaka, N.: Pedestrian accidents and expectations for AEB. J. Soc. Mech. Eng. 118(1157), 192–195 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, W., Chen, Y.: Safety distance warning system with a novel algorithm for vehicle safety braking distance calculating. Int. J. Veh. Saf. 5(3), 213–231 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, K., Peng, H.: Evaluation of automotive forward collision warning and collision avoidance algorithms. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 43(10), 735–751 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Minderhoud, M.M., Bovy, P.H.: Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. Accid. Anal. Prev. 33(1), 89–97 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wada, T., Doi, S., Imai, K., Tsuru, N., Isaji, K., Kaneko, H.: Analysis of braking behaviors in car following based on a performance index for approach and alienation. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Istanbul, pp. 547–552 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheng, S., Li, L., Yan, B., Liu, C., Wang, X., Fang, J.: Simultaneous estimation of tire side-slip angle and lateral tire force for vehicle lateral stability control. Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 132, 168–182 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pei, X., Liu, Z., Ma, G., et al.: Research on test scenarios of automatic emergency braking system. J. Autom. Safe Energ. 3(1), 26–33 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Panáček, V., Semela, M., Adamec, V., Schüllerová, B.: Impact of usable coefficient of adhesion between tyre and road surface by modern vehicle on its dynamics while driving and braking in the curve. Transport 31(2), 142–146 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lekic, V., Babic, Z.: Automotive radar and camera fusion using generative adversarial networks. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 184, 1–8 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Han, J., Heo, O., Park, M., Kee, S., Sunwoo, M.: Vehicle distance estimation using a mono-camera for FCW/AEB systems. Int. J. Autom. Technol. 17(3), 483–491 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen, Y., Shen, K., Wang, S.: Forward collision warning system considering both time-to-collision and safety braking distance. In: 2013 IEEE 8th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), Melbourne, VIC, pp. 972–977 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stanisław Jurecki, R., Lech Stańczyk, T., Jacek Jaśkiewicz, M.: Driver’s reaction time in a simulated, complex road incident. Transport 32(1), 44–45 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sena, P., d’Amore, M., Brandimonte, M.A., Squitieri, R., Fiorentino, A.: Experimental framework for simulators to study driver cognitive distraction: brake reaction time in different levels of arousal. Transp. Res. Procedia 14, 4410–4419 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Novikov, I., Lazarev, D.: Experimental installation for calculation of road adhesion coefficient of locked car wheel. Transp. Res. Procedia 20, 463–467 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shandong University of TechnologyZiboChina

Personalised recommendations