Advertisement

Phraseological Variation in Spanish Academic Writing

  • Marcos García SalidoEmail author
Conference paper
  • 308 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11755)

Abstract

Research on lexical bundles has shown that a considerable part of discourse relies on a set of routinised lexical combinations. This has had implications both for descriptive research and for lexicographic applications. Thus, from a descriptive perspective, considerable attention has been paid to the description of lexical bundles in terms of their structure and functions and to the different preferences of bundles’ use from different genres. As for lexicographic applications, lexical bundles have been integrated in dictionaries and writing aids. This paper analyses to what extent a cross-disciplinary set of lexical bundles can be identified for academic writing in Spanish and to what extent the use of these bundles varies depending on the scientific domain considered.

Keywords

Lexical bundles Academic writing Cross-disciplinary variation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Supported by Xunta de Galicia, through grant ED481D 2017/009.

References

  1. 1.
    Alonso-Ramos, M., García-Salido, M., Garcia, M.: Exploiting a corpus to compile a lexical resource for academic writing: Spanish lexical combinations. In: Kosem, I., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of 2017 eLex Conference, pp. 571–586. Lexical Computing CZ, Brno (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Appel, R., Trofimovich, P.: Transitional probability predicts native and non-native use of formulaic sequences. Int. J. Appl. Linguist. 27, 1–20 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biber, D., Conrad, S., Viviana, C.: If you look at... Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Appl. Linguist. 25, 371–405 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biglan, A.: The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. J. Appl. Psychol. 57(3), 195–203 (1973).  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cortes, V.: Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: examples from history and biology. Engl. Specif. Purp. 23(4), 397–423 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cortes, V.: A comparative analysis of lexical bundles in academic history writing in English and Spanish. Corpora 3(1), 43–57 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.3366/e1749503208000063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coxhead, A., Byrd, P.: Preparing writing teachers to teach the vocabulary and grammar of academic prose. J. Second Lang. Writ. 16(3), 129–147 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Durrant, P.: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: mapping the territories. Appl. Linguist. 38(2), 165–193 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv011MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grabowski, Ł., Juknevičienė, R.: Towards a refined inventory of lexical bundles: an experiment in the Formulex method. Stud. Lang. 29, 58–73 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.0.29.15327. http://www.kalbos.ktu.lt/index.php/KStud/article/view/15327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Granger, S., Paquot, M.: Electronic lexicography goes local: design and structures of a needs-driven online academic writing aid. Lexicographica: Int. Ann. Lexicogr 31(1), 118–141 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1515/lexi. http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/166516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Groom, N.: Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: an exploratory study. Engl. Acad. Purp. 4(3), 257–277 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Halliday, M.: Functional Grammar. Routledge, London (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021717531970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hyland, K.: As can be seen: lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. Engl. Specif. Purp. 27(1), 4–21 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hyland, K., Tse, P.: Is there an “academic vocabulary”? TESOL Q. 41(2), 235–253 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00058.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kübler, N., Pecman, M.: The ARTES bilingual LSP dictionary: from collocation to higher order phraseology. In: Electronic Lexicography, pp. 187–210. Oxford University Press (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654864.003.0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mel’čuk, I.: Phraseology in the language, in the dictionary, and in the computer. Yearb. Phraseol. 3, 31–56 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1515/phras-2012-0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simpson-Vlach, R., Ellis, N.C.: An academic formulas list: new methods in phraseology research. Appl. Linguist. 31(4), 487–512 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sinclair, J.: Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991).  https://doi.org/10.2307/330144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tracy-Ventura, N., Cortes, V., Biber, D.: Lexical bundles in speech and writing. In: Working with Spanish Corpora, pp. 217–231. Continuum, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Verdaguer, I., et al.: Scie-Lex. A lexical database. In: Verdaguer, I., Laso, N.J., Salazar, D. (eds.) Biomedical English: A Corpus-Based Approach, pp. 21–38. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Villayandre Llamazares, M.: “HARTA” de noveles: un corpus de español académico. CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 5(1), 131 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.15366/chimera2018.5.1.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Grupo LyS, Departamento de LetrasUniversidade da CoruñaA CoruñaSpain

Personalised recommendations