Advertisement

Towards an Interdisciplinary Understanding of Landscape Qualities: Wilderness, Tranquillity and Dark Skies

  • Flurina M. WartmannEmail author
  • William A. Mackaness
  • Nicole Bauer
  • Janine Bolliger
  • Felix Kienast
Chapter
Part of the Innovations in Landscape Research book series (ILR)

Abstract

The need to assess landscape qualities has become increasingly important over the past decades, with landscapes being continuously shaped and re-shaped through dynamic natural and anthropogenic processes. It is now widely recognised that landscapes need to be studied both in terms of their physical and ecological elements as well as how people living in or visiting landscapes perceive and interact with them. Different approaches have been developed over time for assessing these variegated aspects of landscape qualities, which range from methods in the natural sciences to the social sciences and humanities. Using the three examples of wilderness, tranquillity and dark skies as landscape qualities, we review existing quantitative and qualitative approaches to illustrate the potential of interdisciplinary landscape research. Furthermore, we highlight the potential of novel methodologies and data sources to study these landscape qualities, including the use of machine learning for automated image recognition, analysis of social media data (tags, location and image content), as well as citizen science approaches.

Keywords

Landscape qualities Landscape research Landscape perception Wilderness mapping Tranquillity mapping Nightscapes Dark skies Soundscapes 

References

  1. Agrawal A, Redford K (2009) Conservation and displacement: an overview. Conserv Soc 7(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AuE BL (2004) Stopp der Lichtverschmutzung. http://www.darksky.ch/dss/wp-content/uploads/2004/01/BL_flyer.pdf. Last accessed 15 March 2019
  3. Azam C, Le Viol I, Bas Y, Zissis G, Vernet A, Julien J-F, Kerbiriou C (2018) Evidence for distance and illuminance thresholds in the effects of artificial lighting on bat activity. Landscape Urban Plann 175:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer N (2005a) Attitudes towards wilderness and public demands on wilderness areas. In: Kowarik I, Körner S (eds) Wild urban woodlands. New perspectives for urban forestry. Springer, Berlin, pp 47–66Google Scholar
  5. Bauer N (2005b) Für und wider Wildnis: Soziale Dimensionen einer aktuellen gesellschaftlichen Debatte. Bristol Sc. Bern: Haupt, 185 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer N, Wallner A, Hunziker M (2009) The change of European landscapes: human-nature relationships, public attitudes towards rewilding, and the implications for landscape management in Switzerland. J Environ Manage 90(9):2910–2920PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauer N, Vasile M, Mondini M (2018) Attitudes towards nature, wilderness and protected areas: a way to sustainable stewardship in the South-Western Carpathians. J Environ Plann Manage 61(5–6):857–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beard JG, Ragheb MG (1983) Measuring leisure motivation. J Leisure Res 15(3):219–228Google Scholar
  9. Bennie J, Davies TW, Duffy JP, Inger R, Gaston KJ (2014) Contrasting trends in light pollution across Europe based on satellite observed night time lights. Sci Rep 4:3789PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bird BL, Branch LC, Miller DL (2004) Effects of coastal lighting on foraging behavior of beach mice. Conserv Biol 18(5):1435–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boller F, Hunziker M, Conedera M, Elsasser H, Krebs P (2010) Fascinating remoteness: the dilemma of hiking tourism development in peripheral mountain areas. Mt Res Dev 30(4):320–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brüning A, Hölker F, Franke S, Kleiner W, Kloas W (2016) Impact of different colours of artificial light at night on melatonin rhythm and gene expression of gonadotropins in European perch. Sci Total Environ 543:214–222PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Carver S, Fritz S (2016a) Introduction. In: Carver S, Fritz S (eds) Mapping wilderness: concepts, techniques and applications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carver S, Fritz S (2016b) Mapping wilderness: concepts, techniques and applications. Springer, Dordrecht, 204 p. ISBN 978-94-017-7397-3.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7399-7Google Scholar
  15. Carver S, Evans AJ, Fritz S (2002) Wilderness attribute mapping in the United Kingdom. Int J Wilderness 8(1):24–29Google Scholar
  16. Carver S, Comber A, McMorran R, Nutter S (2012) A GIS model for mapping spatial patterns and distribution of wild land in Scotland. Landscape Urban Plann 104(3):395–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carver S, Tricker J, Landres P (2013) Keeping it wild: mapping wilderness character in the United States. J Environ Manage 131:239–255PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. CfDS (2009) Blinded by the Light? A Handbook on Light Pollution. BAA, Hampshire, 40 p. http://www.britastro.org/dark-skies/pdfs/HANDBOOKTEXT.pdf. Last accessed 18 Mar 2019
  19. Chepesiuk R (2009) Missing the dark: health effects of light pollution. Environ Health Perspect 117(1):A20PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chesnokova O, Purves RS (2018) From image descriptions to perceived sounds and sources in landscape: analyzing aural experience through text. Appl Geogr 93:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cho Y, Ryu S-H, Lee BR, Kim KH, Lee E, Choi J (2015) Effects of artificial light at night on human health: a literature review of observational and experimental studies applied to exposure assessment. Chronobiol Int 32(9):1294–1310PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Cinzano P, Falchi F, Elvidge CD (2001) The first world atlas of the artificial night sky brightness. Mon Not R Astron Soc 328(3):689–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Claudio L (2009) Switch on the night: policies for smarter lighting. Environ Health Perspect 117(1):A28–A31PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cohn JP (2008) Citizen science: can volunteers do real research? Bioscience 58(3):192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Comber AE, Carver S, Fritz S, McMorran R, Washtell J, Fisher P (2010) Different methods, different wilds: evaluating alternative mappings of wildness using fuzzy MCE and Dempster-Shafer MCE. Comput Environ Urban Syst 34(2):142–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cordell HK, Tarrant MA, Green GT (2003) Is the public viewpoint of wilderness shifting. Int J Wilderness 9(2):27–32Google Scholar
  27. Cosgrove D (1984) Social formation and symbolic landscapes. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI. ISBN 0-299-15514-5, 332 pGoogle Scholar
  28. CPRE (2005) Mapping tranquillity. Defining and assessing a valuable resource. Campaign to Protect Rural England, Northumberland. http://www.cpre.org.uk/resources/countryside/tranquil-places/item/download/369. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  29. CPRE (2007) Tranquillity map: England, campaign to protect rural England. http://www.cpre.org.uk/resources/countryside/tranquil-places/item/download/352. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  30. CPRE (2018) England’s light pollution and dark skies. https://www.nightblight.cpre.org.uk/maps. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  31. CPRE and the Countryside Commission (1995) Tranquil areas: England map. https://www.thenbs.com/PublicationIndex/documents/details?Pub=CPRE&DocID=273255. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  32. Cronon W (1996) The trouble with wilderness, or, getting back to the wrong nature. In: Cronon W (ed) Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature. W.W. Norton and Company, New York, pp 69–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Davies TW, Smyth T (2018) Why artificial light at night should be a focus for global change research in the 21st century. Glob Change Biol 24(3):872–882PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. De Vries S, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, Spreeuwenberg P (2003) Natural environments—healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environ Plann A 35(10):1717–1731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Descola P (1996) In the society of nature, a native ecology in Amazonia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 372 p.  https://doi.org/10.2458/v6i1.21503. ISBN-13: 978-0521574679, ISBN-10: 0521574676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dickinson JL, Bonney R (2012) Citizen science: Public participation in environmental research. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 240 pGoogle Scholar
  37. Durrant JO, Shumway JM (2004) Attitudes toward wilderness study areas: a survey of six southeastern Utah counties. Environ Manage 33(2):271–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. European Commission (2013) Guidelines on Wilderness in Natura 2000. Management of terrestrial wilderness and wild areas within the Natura 2000 Network. Technical report-2013-069. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/wilderness/pdf/WildernessGuidelines.pdf. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  39. European Parliament (2009) Wilderness in Europe European Parliament resolution of 3 February 2009 on Wilderness in Europe (2008/2210(INI)). https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5bc06340-9f99-4071-9e26-a4abfc34ce6e/language-en. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  40. Eveleigh A, Jennett C, Blandford A, Brohan P, Cox AL (2014) Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 2985–2994Google Scholar
  41. Fisher M Carver S, Kun Z, McMorran R, Arrell K, Mitchell G (2010) Review of status and conservation of wild land in Europe. Project commissioned by the Scottish government. Leeds, UKGoogle Scholar
  42. FOEN and WSL (2013) Neue Ansätze zur Erfassung der Landschaftsqualität. Zwischenbericht Landschaftsbeobachtung Schweiz (LABES). Berne. https://www.bafu.admin.ch/dam/bafu/de/dokumente/landschaft/uw-umwelt-wissen/neue_ansaetze_zurerfassungderlandschaftsqualitaet.pdf.download.pdf/neue_ansaetze_zurerfassungderlandschaftsqualitaet.pdf. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  43. Fonken LK, Workman JL, Walton JC, Weil ZM, Morris JS, Haim A, Nelson RJ (2010) Light at night increases body mass by shifting the time of food intake. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(43):18664–18669PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Frick J, Degenhardt B, Buchecker M (2007) Predicting local residents’ use of nearby outdoor recreation areas through quality perceptions and recreational expectations. Forest Snow Landscape Res 81(1–2):31–41Google Scholar
  45. Fritz S, Carver S, See L (2000) New GIS approaches to wild land mapping in Europe. In: McCool SF, Cole DN, Borrie WT, O’Loughlin J (eds) Wilderness science in a time of change conference—Volume 2: Wilderness within the context of larger systems, 1999 May 23–27, Missoula, MT. Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-2. Ogden, UT: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, pp 120–127Google Scholar
  46. Fritz S, Fonte CC, See L (2017) The role of citizen science in earth observation. Remote Sens 9(4):357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gallaway T, Olsen RN, Mitchell DM (2010) The economics of global light pollution. Ecol Econ 69(3):658–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gaston KJ, Davies TW, Bennie J, Hopkins J (2012) Reducing the ecological consequences of night-time light pollution: options and developments. J Appl Ecol 49(6):1256–1266PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gaston KJ, Bennie J, Davies TW, Hopkins J (2013) The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal. Biol Rev 88(4):912–927PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Guerrero P, Møller MS, Olafsson AS, Snizek B (2016) Revealing cultural ecosystem services through Instagram images: the potential of social media volunteered geographic information for urban green infrastructure planning and governance. Urban Plann 1(2):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Habron D (1998) Visual perception of wild land in Scotland. Landscape Urban Plann 42(1):45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Herzog TR, Barnes GJ (1999) Tranquility and preference revisited. J Environ Psychol 19(2):171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Herzog TR, Bosley PJ (1992) Tranquility and preference as affective qualities of natural environments. J Environ Psychol 12(2):115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Herzog TR, Chernick KK (2000) Tranquility and danger in urban and natural settings. J Environ Psychol 20(1):29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hewlett D, Harding L, Munro T, Terradillos A, Wilkinson K (2017) Broadly engaging with tranquillity in protected landscapes: a matter of perspective identified in GIS. Landscape Urban Plann 158:185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Höchtl F, Lehringer S, Konold W (2005) “Wilderness”: what it means when it becomes a reality—a case study from the southwestern Alps. Landscape Urban Plann 70(1–2):85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hölker F, Wolter C, Perkin EK, Tockner K (2010) Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. Trends Ecol Evol 25(12):681–682PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Hu Z, Hu H, Huang Y (2018) Association between nighttime artificial light pollution and sea turtle nest density along Florida coast: a geospatial study using VIIRS remote sensing data. Environ Pollut 239:30–42PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Hunter J (2014) On the other side of sorrow: nature and people in the Scottish Highlands. Birlinn Ltd., Edinburgh, UK, p 272Google Scholar
  60. IUCN (2018) Category Ib: wilderness area. https://www.iucn.org/theme/protected-areas/about/protected-areas-categories/category-ib-wilderness-area. Last accessed 17 Oct 2018
  61. Jackson S, Fuller D, Dunsford H, Mowbray R, Hext S, MacFarlane R, Haggett C (2008) Tranquillity mapping: developing a robust methodology for planning support. Report to the Campaign to Protect Rural England, Centre for Environmental & Spatial Analysis, Northumbria University, Bluespace environments and the University of Newcastle upon on Tyne. Retrieved from http://www.cpre.org.uk/resources/countryside/tranquil-places/item/download/542. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  62. Johnson CY, Bowker JM, Bergstrom JC, Ken Cordell H (2004) Wilderness values in America: does immigrant status or ethnicity matter? Soc Nat Res 17(7):611–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Jones-Walters L, Čivić K (2010) Wilderness and biodiversity. J Nat Conserv 18(4):338–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 352Google Scholar
  65. Kienast F, Frick J, van Strien MJ, Hunziker M (2015) The Swiss Landscape Monitoring Program—a comprehensive indicator set to measure landscape change. Ecol Model 295:136–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kliskey AD, Kearsley GW (1993) Mapping multiple perceptions of wilderness in southern New Zealand. Appl Geogr 13(3):203–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kloog I, Haim A, Stevens RG, Barchana M, Portnov BA (2008) Light at night co-distributes with incident breast but not lung cancer in the female population of Israel. Chronobiol Int 25(1):65–81PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Knop E, Zoller L, Ryser R, Gerpe C, Hörler M, Fontaine C (2017) Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination. Nature 548(7666):206PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Kuiters AT, van Eupen M, Carver S, Fisher M, Kun Z, Vancura V (2013) Wilderness register and indicator for Europe. ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/wilderness/pdf/Wilderness_register_indicator.pdf. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  70. Kyba CCM, Wagner JM, Kuechly HU, Walker CE, Elvidge CD, Falchi F, Ruhtz T, Fischer J, Hölker F (2013) Citizen science provides valuable data for monitoring global night sky luminance. Sci Rep 3:1835PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Landres P, Barns C, Dennis JG, Devine T, Geissler P, McCasland CS, Merigliano L, Seastrand J, Swain R (2008) Keeping it wild: an interagency strategy to monitor trends in wilderness character across the National Wilderness Preservation System. General technical report RMRS-GTR-212. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, 77 P., 212Google Scholar
  72. Lesslie R (1998) Global wilderness, Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC. Dataset derived using the Digital Chart of the World 1993 version and methods based on the Australian National Wilderness Inventory. https://www.unep-wcmc.org/resources-and-data/global-wilderness. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  73. Lesslie R (2016) The wilderness continuum concept and its application in Australia: lessons for modern conservation. In: Carver S, Fritz S (eds) Mapping wilderness: concepts, techniques and applications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lesslie R, Maslen M (1995) National wilderness inventory handbook of procedures, content and usage, 2nd edn. Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra, 98 ppGoogle Scholar
  75. Lesslie R, Taylor SG (1985) The wilderness continuum concept and its implications for Australian wilderness preservation policy. Biol Conserv 32(4):309–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Levett R (2000) A headline indicator of tranquillity: definition and measurement issues. Interim report to CPRE. CAG Consultants for CPRE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  77. Lorne JK, Salmon M (2007) Effects of exposure to artificial lighting on orientation of hatchling sea turtles on the beach and in the ocean. Endangered Species Res 3(1):23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lukyanenko R, Parsons J, Wiersma YF (2016) Emerging problems of data quality in citizen science. Conserv Biol 30(3):447–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lutz AR, Simpson-Housley P, Deman AF (1999) Wilderness: rural and urban attitudes and perceptions. Environ Behav 31(2):259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. MacFarlane R, Haggett C, Fuller D, Dunsford H, Carlisle B (2004) Tranquillity mapping: developing a robust methodology for planning support. Newcastle upon Tyne: Report to the Campaign to Protect Rural England, Countryside Agency, North East Assembly, Northumberland Strategic Partnership, Northumberland National Park Authority and Durham County Council, Centre for Environmental & Spatial Analysis, Northumbria UniversityGoogle Scholar
  81. Mackenzie AFD (2006) A working land: crofting communities, place and the politics of the possible in post-Land Reform Scotland. Trans Inst Br Geogr 31(3):383–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Măntoiu DŞ, Nistorescu MC, Şandric IC, Mirea IC, Hăgătiş A, Stanciu E (2016) Wilderness areas in Romania: a case study on the South Western Carpathians. In: Carver S, Fritz S (eds) Mapping wilderness. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Mazenauer C (2015) Nächtliche Dunkelheit im Val Müstair. Eine Untersuchung über die Wahrnehmung und das touristische Potenzial der nächtlichen Dunkelheit. Master thesis at the Geography Department, University of Zurich, Switzerland. https://tinyurl.com/y79qyrcy. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  84. Mc Morran R, Price MF, Warren CR (2008) The call of different wilds: the importance of definition and perception in protecting and managing Scottish wild landscapes. J Environ Plann Manage 51(2):177–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. McCloskey JM, Spalding H (1989) A reconnaissance-level inventory of the amount of wilderness remaining in the world. Ambio 221–227Google Scholar
  86. Nash RF (2014) Wilderness and the American mind, 5th edn. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA, p 413Google Scholar
  87. National Planning Policy Framework (2012) Conserving and enhancing the natural environment. Government of the United Kingdom. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/national-planning-policy-framework/11-conserving-and-enhancing-the-natural-environment. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  88. Navara KJ, Nelson RJ (2007) The dark side of light at night: physiological, epidemiological, and ecological consequences. J Pineal Res 43(3):215–224PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. NBS (2004) Quality of life counts. Indicators for a strategy for sustainable development for the United Kingdom. 2004 Update. Updating the baseline assessments made in 1999. http://www.nies.go.jp/db/sdidoc/qolc2004.pdf. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  90. Neumann RP (1998) Imposing wilderness, Struggles over livelihood and nature preservation in Africa. University of California Press, Berkeley (California studies in critical human geography) 268 pp. ISBN: 9780520234680Google Scholar
  91. Ólafsdóttir R, Sæþórsdóttir AD, Runnström M (2016) Purism scale approach for wilderness mapping in Iceland. In: Carver S, Steffen F (eds) Mapping wilderness. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 157–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Orsi F, Geneletti D, Borsdorf A (2013) Mapping wildness for protected area management: a methodological approach and application to the Dolomites UNESCO World Heritage Site (Italy). Landscape Urban Plann 120:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Perkin EK, Hölker F, Tockner K (2014) The effects of artificial lighting on adult aquatic and terrestrial insects. Freshw Biol 59(2):368–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Pheasant R, Horoshenkov K, Watts G, Barrett B (2008) The acoustic and visual factors influencing the construction of tranquil space in urban and rural environments tranquil spaces-quiet places? J Acoust Soc Am 123(3):1446–1457PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Pheasant RJ, Watts GR, Horoshenkov KV (2009) Validation of a tranquillity rating prediction tool. Acta Acustica United Acustica 95(6):1024–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Plutzar C, Enzenhofer K, Hoser F, Zika M, Kohler B (2016) Is there something wild in Austria? In: Carver S, Fritz S (eds) Mapping wilderness. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Poiani S, Dietrich C, Barroso A, Costa-Leonardo AM (2015) Effects of residential energy-saving lamps on the attraction of nocturnal insects. Lighting Res Technol 47(3):338–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Polak T, Korine C, Yair S, Holderied MW (2011) Differential effects of artificial lighting on flight and foraging behaviour of two sympatric bat species in a desert. J Zool 285(1):21–27Google Scholar
  99. Purves RS, Edwardes A, Wood J (2011) Describing place through user generated content. First Monday 16(9). https://ojphi.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3710/3035. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  100. Radford SL, Senn J, Kienast F (2019) Indicator-based assessment of wilderness quality in mountain landscapes. Ecol Ind 97:438–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Reynolds LD (1998) de tranquillitate animi. dial. 9 in: L. Annaei Senecae dialogorum libri duodecim; Reynolds LD (ed). Clarendon, Oxford. ISBN: 9780198146599.  https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198146599.book1
  102. Rich C, Longcore T (2013) Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting. Island Press, Washington, p 480Google Scholar
  103. Richards E (2012) The highland clearances. Birlinn Ltd., Edinburgh, UK. ISBN:978-1-84158-542-0, eBook ISBN: 978-0-85790-524-6Google Scholar
  104. Russo D, Cistrone L, Libralato N, Korine C, Jones G, Ancillotto L (2017) Adverse effects of artificial illumination on bat drinking activity. Anim Conserv 20(6):492–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rydell J, Eklöf J, Sánchez-Navarro S (2017) Age of enlightenment: long-term effects of outdoor aesthetic lights on bats in churches. R Soc Open Sci 4(8):161077PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Sanderson EW, Jaiteh M, Levy MA, Redford KH, Wannebo AV, Woolmer G (2002) The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience 52(10):891–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Seresinhe CI, Preis T, Moat HS (2015) Quantifying the impact of scenic environments on health. Sci Rep 5(Article number 16899)Google Scholar
  108. Shahzad G, Yang H, Ahmad AW, Lee C (2016) Energy-efficient intelligent street lighting system using traffic-adaptive control. IEEE Sens J 16(13):5397–5405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Shepherd D, Welch D, Dirks KN, McBride D (2013) Do quiet areas afford greater health-related quality of life than noisy areas? Int J Environ Res Publ Health 10(4):1284–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Silva E, Marco A, da Graca J, Perez H, Abella E, Patino-Martinez J, Martins S, Almeida C (2017) Light pollution affects nesting behavior of loggerhead turtles and predation risk of nests and hatchlings. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 173:240–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Smith M (2008) Time to turn off the lights. Nature 457(7225):27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. SNH (2013) Mapping Scotland’s wildness, non-technical methodology. https://www.nature.scot/mapping-scotlands-wildness-and-wild-land-non-technical-description-methodology. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  113. SNH (2014a) Core Areas Of Wild Land 2013 map Scottish Natural Heritage’s advice to government—16th June 2014. https://www.nature.scot/sites/default/files/2018-02/CAWL2013map-AdvicetoGovernment-RevisedFinal-17June2014.pdf. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  114. SNH (2014b) Wild land areas. https://www.nature.scot/wild-land-area-descriptions. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  115. Spiegel K, Knutson K, Leproult R, Tasali E, Van Cauter E (2005) Sleep loss: a novel risk factor for insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes. J Appl Physiol 99(5):2008–2019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Stevens RG (2009) Light-at-night, circadian disruption and breast cancer: assessment of existing evidence. Int J Epidemiol 38(4):963–970PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Stremlow M, Sidler C (2002) Schreibzüge durch die Wildnis: Wildnisvorstellungen in Literatur und Printmedien der Schweiz, 1st edn. Haupt, BernGoogle Scholar
  118. Terradillos A, Wilkinson K (2015) Broadly Engaging with Tranquility Project Report IV: GIS. reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/851934/197/PRJ4-Final-10-September-2015.pdf. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  119. Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 11(3):201–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. UNEP (2002) Globio: global methodology for mapping human impacts on the biosphere. United Nations Environment Programme. www.globio.info. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  121. US Congress (1964) Wilderness act, Public law 88-577. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-78/pdf/STATUTE-78-Pg890.pdf. Last accessed 15 Mar 2019
  122. US National Park Service (2018) Night skies. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nightskies/stargaze.htm. Accessed 4 Oct 2018
  123. van Tonder GJ, Lyons MJ (2005) Visual perception in Japanese rock garden design. Axiomathes 15(3):353–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. van Zanten BT, van Berkel DB, Meentemeyer RK, Smith JW, Tieskens KF, Verburg PH (2016) Continental-scale quantification of landscape values using social media data. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(46):12974–12979PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  125. Velarde MD, Fry G, Tveit M (2007) Health effects of viewing landscapes—landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forest Urban Greening 6(4):199–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Vienneau D, de Hoogh K, Faeh D, Kaufmann M, Wunderli JM, Röösli M, Group SNCS (2017) More than clean air and tranquillity: residential green is independently associated with decreasing mortality. Environ Int 108:176–184PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  127. Wallner A, Bauer N, Hunziker M (2007) Perceptions and evaluations of biosphere reserves by local residents in Switzerland and Ukraine. Landscape Urban Plann 83(2–3):104–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Wartmann FM, Acheson E, Purves RS (2018) Describing and comparing landscapes using tags, texts, and free lists: an interdisciplinary approach. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 32(8):1572–1592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Wartmann FM, Tieskens KF, van Zanten BT, Verburg PH (2019). Exploring tranquillity experienced in landscapes based on social media. Appl GeogrGoogle Scholar
  130. Watson JEM, Shanahan DF, Di Marco M, Allan J, Laurance WF, Sanderson EW, Mackey B, Venter O (2016) Catastrophic declines in wilderness areas undermine global environment targets. Curr Biol 26(21):2929–2934PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  131. Watson JEM, Venter O, Lee J, Jones KR, Robinson JG, Possingham HP, Allan JR (2018) Protect the last of the wild. Nature 563:27–30PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  132. Watts GR, Pheasant RJ (2015a) Identifying tranquil environments and quantifying impacts. Appl Acoust 89:122–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Watts GR, Pheasant RJ (2015b) Tranquillity in the Scottish Highlands and Dartmoor National Park—the importance of soundscapes and emotional factors. Appl Acoust 89:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Watts GR, Pheasant RJ, Horoshenkov KV (2011) Predicting perceived tranquillity in urban parks and open spaces. Environ Plann B Plann Des 38(4):585–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Watts GR, Miah A, Pheasant R (2013) Tranquillity and soundscapes in urban green spaces—predicted and actual assessments from a questionnaire survey. Environ Plann B Plann Des 40(1):170–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Wartmann FM, Mackaness WA (in review) Mapping tranquillity based on interviews and social media data. Submitted to Landscape ResearchGoogle Scholar
  137. Yang X, Fu B, Chen L (2013) Remote sensing and geospatial analysis for landscape pattern characterization. In: Fu B, Jones K (eds) Landscape ecology for sustainable environment and culture. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 205–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Zumthor P, Beer I, Mathieu J (2005) Wieviel Licht braucht der Mensch, um leben zu können, und wieviel Dunkelheit?/Di quanta luce ha bisogno l’uomo per vivere e di quanta oscurità? vdf-Hochschulverlag und Editrice Compositori, Zurich and BolognaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Flurina M. Wartmann
    • 1
    Email author
  • William A. Mackaness
    • 2
  • Nicole Bauer
    • 1
  • Janine Bolliger
    • 1
  • Felix Kienast
    • 1
  1. 1.Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape WSLBirmensdorfSwitzerland
  2. 2.School of GeosciencesEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations