Advertisement

Democratic Education and Iterations: On the Emotion of Talking Back

  • Nuraan DavidsEmail author
  • Yusef Waghid
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we focus on Benhabib’s (The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens, Cambridge University Press, 2004) conception of democratic iteration, as being at the core of democratic education. We posit that the premise of democratic iterations is not to alter the normative validity of practical discourses, but to determine the legitimacy of particular processes of opinion and will formation. In this regard, we focus on two examples: one commonly referred to as the French scarf affair and the other involving the prohibition of ‘black languages and hair’ in South African schools. We argue that it would be unjustifiable to delink democratic education from rational articulations and rearticulations and emotional will formation.

Keywords

Democratic iteration Practice Rational articulation Will formation 

References

  1. Benhabib, S. 1996. Towards a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy. In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. S. Benhabib, 67–94. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2004. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens. The John Robert Seeley Memorial Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2006. Another Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2010. Human Rights, Sovereignty and Democratic Iterations. Session 6, Keynote Lectures: Human Rights—Global Culture—International Institutions, Our Common Future. Hannover.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2011. Dignity in Adversity: Human Rights in Troubled Times. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Davids, N. 2018. Global Citizenship Education, Postcolonial Identities, and a Moral Imagination. In Palgrave Handbook of Global Citizenship and Education, ed. I. Davis, A. Peterson, D. Kiwan, C. Peck, E. Sant, L. Ho, and Y. Waghid, 193–208. New York & London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Derrida, J. 1988. Signature, Event, Context. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Isaacs, L. 2016. San Souci Girls Protest Racist Language Rules. Cape Times, September 1. www.iol.co.za/capetimes/sans-souci-girls-protest-racist-language-rules-2063682. Accessed 18 Mar 2019.
  9. Modood, T. 1998. Anti-essentialism, Multiculturalism and the ‘Recognition’ of Religious Groups. Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (4): 378–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mouffe, C. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  11. Nicholson, G. 2016. Pretoria Girls High: A Protest Against Sacrificed Cultures and Identities. Daily Maverick, August 30. www.dailymaverick.co.za/…/2016-08-30-pretoria-girls-high-a-protest-against-sacrific…. Accessed 18 Mar 2019.
  12. Pather, R. 2016. Pretoria Girls High School Pupil: I Was Instructed to Fix Myself as if I Was Broken, August 29. https://mg.co.za/article/2016-08-29-pretoria-girls-high-school-pupil-i-was-instructed-to-fix-myself-as-if-i-was-broken. Accessed 19 Mar 2019.
  13. Thomassen, L. 2011. The Politics of Iterability: Benhabib, the Hijab, and Democratic Iterations. Polity 43 (1): 128–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wa Thiong’o, N. 1981. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. London: James Currey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education Policy StudiesStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations