Advertisement

Individual Preferences for the Unconditional Basic Income in the European Union

  • Lei DelsenEmail author
  • Rutger Schilpzand
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)

Abstract

In representative democracies public opinions matter. In this chapter we analyse the preferences for an Unconditional Basic Income (UBI) among a large, representative sample of people in the 28 member states of the European Union (EU). The survey data were collected by online sampling on mobile devices in March 2017. We apply a multi-level ordered logit model and a fixed effects model. On average, almost three-quarters of the people in the EU stated to (probably) vote for the introduction of UBI, if there would be a referendum on introducing UBI. Half of the voters would like to see UBI being introduced after successful experiments in their own country or abroad; one third as soon as possible. The likelihood to vote in favour of UBI varies significantly between groups of people. The effect of awareness on preferences is inconclusive. The national macro-economic and welfare state contexts have significant effects. “It reduces anxiety about financial basic needs” is considered the most convincing argument for UBI. “It might encourage people to stop working” is considered the most convincing argument against UBI. The self-enhancement hypothesis is confirmed. The positive and negative effects of UBI on individual work choices balance out.

Keywords

Public opinions Stated preference survey Unconditional basic income Referendum European Union 

References

  1. Andersson, J. O., & Kangas, O. (2002). Popular support for basic income in Sweden and Finland. Paper for the BIEN 9th International Congress, Geneva, September 12–14.Google Scholar
  2. Booth, A. L., & Nolen, P. (2012). Gender differences in risk behaviour: does nurture matter? The Economic Journal, 122, F36–F78.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02480.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borghans, L., Heckman, J. J., Golsteyn, B. H. H., & Meijers, H. (2010). Gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(2–3), 649–658.  https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40.  https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burtless, G. (1986). The work response to a guaranteed income: A survey of experimental evidence. In A. H. Munnell (Ed.), Lessons from the income maintenance experiments (pp. 22–52). Boston, MA: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.Google Scholar
  6. Colombo, C., DeRocchi, T., Kurer, T., & Widmer, T. (2016). Analyse der eidgenössischen Abstimmung vom 5. Juni 2016, VOX-Analysen 121. Genf/Zürich: gfs.bern and Institut für Politikwissenschaft der Universität Zürich.Google Scholar
  7. Dalia Research. (2017). The EU’s growing support for basic income. Measuring the change in European support for basic income from April 2016 to March 2017. Berlin: Dalia Research. Accessed June 10, 2019, from https://basicincome.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/DR-2017-survey.pdf
  8. De Wispelaere, J., & Noguera, J. A. (2012). On the political feasibility of universal basic income: An analytic framework. In R. K. Caputo (Ed.), Basic income guarantee and politics: International experiences and perspectives on the viability of income guarantee (pp. 17–38). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delsen, L. (1997, February). A new concept of full employment. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 18(1), 119–135.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X97181007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeMaris, A. (2002). Explained variance in logistic regression: A Monte Carlo study of proposed measures. Sociological Methods and Research, 31(1), 27–74.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124102031001002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dohmen, T. H., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurements, determinants, and behavioural consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522–550.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evers, M., de Mooij, R., & Van Vuuren, D. (2008). The wage elasticity of labour supply: A synthesis of empirical estimates. De Economist, 156(1), 25–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-007-9080-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitzgerald, R., Bottoni, G., & Swift, S. (2017). The future of welfare: Basic income? Accessed June 8, 2019, from http://citizensincome.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/European-Social-Survey-survey-on-Basic-Income.pdf
  14. Forget, E. (2011). The town with no poverty. Using health administration data to revisit outcomes of a Canadian guaranteed annual income field experiment. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, M. (1969). The optimum quantity of money and other essays. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. Gamel, C., Balsan, D., & Vero, J. (2006). The impact of basic income on the propensity to work: Theoretical issues and micro-econometric results. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(3), 476–497.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S. W., & Rubio-Codina, M. (2012). Investing cash transfers to raise long-term living standards. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(1), 164–192.  https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.1.164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilroy, B. M., Heimann, A., & Schopf, M. (2013). Basic income and labour supply: The German case. Basic Income Studies, 8(1), 43–70.  https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2012-0009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structures. The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Groot, L. F. M. (1999). Basic income and unemployment. Ph.D. Dissertation, Thela Thesis, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  21. Haywood, L. (2014). Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen: Eine ökonomische Perspektive, 33, DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus. Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research, DIW.Google Scholar
  22. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. ING. (2016, October). Helicopter money: Loved but not spent. ING special report.Google Scholar
  24. ING. (2018). Basisinkomen? Meerderheid ziet het eigenlijk niet zitten. ING Financieel fit Barometer, Juli, ING Economisch Bureau.Google Scholar
  25. Ipsos MORI. (2017, September 8). Half of UK adults would support universal basic income in principle.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kangas, O., Jauhiainen, S., Simanainen, M., & Ylikännö, M. (Eds.). (2019). The basic income experiment 2017–2018 in Finland: Preliminary results. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Accessed June 8, 2019, from http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/161361
  27. Kapteyn, A., & Teppa, F. (2011). Subjective measures of risk aversion, fixed costs, and portfolio choice. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(4), 564–580.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Killingsworth, M. R. (1983). Labor supply. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Killingsworth, M. R., & Heckman, J. J. (1986). Female labor supply: A survey. In O. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. I, pp. 103–204). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Langer, W. (2017). How to assess the fit of multi-level logit models with Stata? In: Meeting of the German Stata users group. Berlin: Humboldt University.  https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.17570.32966
  31. Lee, S. (2018). Attitudes toward universal basic income and welfare state in Europe: A research note. Basic Income Studies, 13(1), 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3209161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leininger, A., & Heyne, L. (2017). How representative are referendums? Evidence from 20 years of Swiss referendums. Electoral Studies, 48, 84–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Linder, W. (2012). Schweizerische Demokratie. Institutionen – Prozesse – Perspektiven. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
  34. Meuleman, B., van Oorschot, W., Baute, S., Delespaul, S., Gugushvili, D., Laenen, T., Roosma, F., & Rossetti, F. (2018, September). The past, present and future of European welfare attitudes: Topline results from round 8 of the European Social Survey. ESS Topline Results Series, Issue 8. Accessed June 8, 2019, from https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/findings/ESS8_toplines_issue_8_welfare.pdf
  35. Moffitt, R. A. (1981, April 23–27). The negative income tax: Would it discourage work?. Monthly Labor Review.Google Scholar
  36. Nooteboom, B. (1987). Basic income as a basis for small business. International Small Business Journal, 5(3), 10–18.  https://doi.org/10.1177/026624268700500301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Northeastern University. (2018). Optimism and anxiety: Views on the impact of artificial intelligence and higher education’s response, Boston. Accessed June 8, 2019, from https://www.northeastern.edu/gallup/pdf/OptimismAnxietyNortheasternGallup.pdf
  38. Pech, W. J. (2010). Behavioral economics and the basic income guarantee. Basic Income Studies, 5(2), 12–28.  https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pencavel, J. (1986). Labor supply of men: A survey. In O. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. I, pp. 3–102). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pfeifer, M. (2009). Public opinion on state responsibility for minimum income protection: A comparison of 14 European countries. Acta Sociologica, 52(2), 117–134.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699309104000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Robeyns, I. (2000). Hush money or emancipation fee? In R. van der Veen & L. Groot (Eds.), Basic income on the agenda: Policy objectives and political chances (pp. 121–136). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robins, P. K. (1985). Comparison of the labor supply findings from the four negative income tax experiments. Journal of Human Resources, 20(4), 567–582.  https://doi.org/10.2307/145685 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. RSA. (2018). Universal basic income survey. London: The Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce. Accessed June 8, 2019, from https://www.populus.co.uk/2018/08/more-than-twice-as-many-people-support-the-idea-of-a-basic-income-than-oppose-it/
  44. Splendid Research. (2018). Das bedingunslose Grundeinkommen. Eine repräsentativen Umfrage unter 1.024 Deutschen zu Ihrer Meinung zum bedingungslosen Grundeinkommen. Hamburg: Splendid Research.Google Scholar
  45. Standing, G. (2017). Basic income and how we can make it happen. London: Pelican Books.Google Scholar
  46. Tapin, B. M., & McKay, R. T. (2017). The illusion of moral superiority. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(6), 623–631.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616673878 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Teppa, F., & Vis, C. (2012). The CentERpanel and the DNB household survey: Methodological aspects. DNB Occasional Studies, 10(4), 1–53.Google Scholar
  48. Torry, M. (2018). Why we need a citizen’s basic income. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Parijs, P., & Vanderborght, Y. (2017). Basic income: A radical proposal for a free society and a sane economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vlandas, T. (2018). The politics of universal basic income (UBI). Accessed June 11, 2019, from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/netuf/2018/03/07/the-politics-of-universal-basic-income-ubi/
  51. Walter, T. (1989). Basic income: Freedom from poverty, freedom to work. London: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar
  52. Widerquist, K. (2005). A failure to communicate: What (if anything) can we learn from the negative income tax experiments? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 34(1), 49–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Widerquist, K. (2018). The devil’s in the caveats: A critical analysis of basic income experiments for researchers, policymakers, and citizens. Berkeley: Bepress. Accessed June 8, 2019, from https://works.bepress.com/widerquist/86/
  54. Widerquist, K., Noguera, J. A., Vanderborght, Y., & De Wispelaere, J. (Eds.). (2013). Basic income: An anthology of contemporary research. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsInstitute for Management Research, Radboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations