Evaluating System Sufficiency in a Multimodal, Multiuser Sensemaking Environment Designed for Intelligence Analysis

  • Shannon BriggsEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11786)


This paper discusses a prototype brainstorming tool designed for sensemaking in intelligence analysis and integrates multimodal input in an immersive environment that supports multiple users. This digital tool has been designed using structured analytic techniques already in use through analog methods in the intelligence analysis domain. We discuss an ongoing user study that presents preliminary findings for tool, and suggestions for future development.


HCI methods and theories Multimodal interface Evaluation methods and techniques Qualitative and quantitative measurement and evaluation User experience 



I would like to acknowledge Matthew Peveler, Jaimie Drozdal, Lilit Balagyozan, and Hui Su, who have all contributed to the material presented in this paper.


  1. 1.
    Pirolli, P., Card, S.: Sensemaking processes of intelligence analysts and possible leverage points as identified through cognitive task analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, McLean, Virginia (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Görg, C., Liu, Z., Parekh, N., Singhal, K., Stasko, J.: Jigsaw meets Blue Iguanodon - The VAST 2007 Contest. In: In IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benjamin, P., Madanagopal, K., Erraguntla, M., Corlette, D.: Distributed Information Gathering, Exploration and Sensemaking Toolkit (DIGEST). In: Proceedings on the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ICAI); Athens. pp. 449–455. The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp), Athens, United States, Athens (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Keel, P.E.: EWall: a visual analytics environment for collaborative sense-making. Inf. Visualization 6, 48–63 (2007). Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pioch, N.J., Everett, J.O.: POLESTAR: collaborative knowledge management and sensemaking tools for intelligence analysts. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 513–521. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chung, H., North, C., Self, J.Z., Chu, S., Quek, F.: VisPorter: facilitating information sharing for collaborative sensemaking on multiple displays. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 18, 1169–1186 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wright, W., Schroh, D., Proulx, P., Skaburskis, A., Cort, B.: The sandbox for analysis: concepts and methods. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 801–810. ACM, New York (2006).
  8. 8.
    Eccles, R., Kapler, T., Harper, R., Wright, W.: Stories in GeoTime. Inf. Visualization 7, 3–17 (2008). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beebe, S.M., Pherson, R.H.: Cases in Intelligence Analysis: Structured Analytic Techniques in Action. CQ Press, Washington, DC (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Divekar, R.R., et al.: CIRA—An Architecture for Building Configurable Immersive Smart-rooms. 10Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations