Advertisement

10° Off-Axis Tensile Testing of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers Using Digital Image Correlation

  • Matthias MerzkirchEmail author
  • Tim Foecke
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

The current work describes the use of DIC (digital image correlation) for full-field strain and deformation response while performing 10° off-axis tensile tests on rigidly clamped unidirectionally carbon fiber reinforced (CFRP-UD) coupon specimens with a nominal reinforcing fraction of 50 volume percent. Off-axis testing of anisotropic materials produces a nonuniform state of stress and strain when the ends are rigidly clamped and bending moments cannot be eliminated by free rotation. Under this configuration, the application of constant end displacements induces shearing forces and bending couples, which result in the nonuniform deformation. The extension-shear coupling compliance causes the coupon to deform into an S-shape, which is qualitatively visualized using DIC. Quantitative photomechanical investigations of vertical and horizontal displacements of the coupon are compared to approximate analytical solutions originally derived in the 1960s. Additionally, a description of deformation and fracture mechanisms using the DIC calculated strains is provided. In addition to the shear strain in the specimen coordinate axis, the maximum shear strain (used to quantify the shear modulus and the strain to fracture) and normal strain (transverse to fiber orientation) are calculated via strain transformation equations and visualized.

Keywords

Intralaminar shear DIC CFRP Unidirectional Extension-shear coupling 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Edward Pompa for waterjet cutting, Alex Jennion for fractography. Louise Ahure Powell for uniaxial tensile testing results.

References

  1. 1.
    E.C.O. Erickson, C.B. Norris, Tensile properties of glass-fabric laminates with laminations oriented in any way (Wood Engineering Research Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, 1955)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Werren, C.B. Norris, Directional properties of glass-fabric-base plastic laminate panels of sizes that do not buckle (Wood Engineering Research Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, 1956)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.H. Sinclair, C.C. Chamis, Mechanical behaviour and fracture characteristics of off-axis fiber composites. I—experimental investigations. NASA Technical Paper 1081 (1977)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C.C. Chamis, J.H. Sinclair, Mechanical behaviour and fracture characteristics of off-axis fiber composites. Ii—theory and comparisons. NASA Technical Paper 1082 (1978)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.N. Chatterjee, D.F. Adams, D.W. Oplinger, Test Methods for Composites a Status Report. Vol. III Shear Test Methods (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Pierron, A. Vautrin, The 10 degrees off-axis tensile test: A critical approach. Compos. Sci. Technol. 56(4), 483–488 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.T. Sun, S.P. Berreth, A new end tab Design for off-Axis tension test of composite-materials. J. Compos. Mater. 22(8), 766–779 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C.C. Chamis, J.H. Sinclair, Ten-deg off-axis test for shear properties in fiber composites. Exp. Mech. 17(9), 339–346 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.J. Pindera, C.T. Herakovich, Shear characterization of unidirectional composites with the off-axis tension test. Exp. Mech. 26(1), 103–112 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N.J. Pagano, J.C. Halpin, Influence of end constraint in the testing of anisotropic bodies. J. Compos. Mater. 2(1), 18–31 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R.R. Rizzo, More on the influence of end constraints on off-axis tensile tests. J. Compos. Mater. 3, 202–219 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    V.K. Ganesh, N.K. Naik, (+/−45) degree off-axis tension test for shear characterization of plain weave fabric composites. J. Compos. Technol. Res. 19(2), 77–85 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M.P. Nemeth, C.T. Herakovich, D. Post, On the off-axis tensile test for unidirectional composites. J. Compos. Technol. Res. 5(2) (1983)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E.M. Wu, R.L. Thomas, Note on the off-axis test of a composite. J. Compos. Mater. 2(4), 523–526 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G.L. Richards, T.P. Airhart, J.E. Ashton, Off-axis tensile coupon testing. J. Compos. Mater. 3, 586 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    B.-W. Chang, P.-H. Huang, D.G. Smith, A pinned-end fixture for off-axis testing. Exp. Tech. 8(6), 28–30 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M.J. Pindera, G. Choksi, J.S. Hidde, C.T. Herakovich, A methodology for accurate shear characterization of unidirectional composites. J. Compos. Mater. 21(12), 1164–1184 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    C.T. Sun, I. Chung, An oblique end-tab design for testing off-axis composite specimens. Composites 24(8), 619–623 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Merzkirch, Mechanical Characterization Using Digital Image Correlation - Advanced Fibrous Composite Laminates, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, to be submitted 2020Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    L.A. Powell, W.E. Luecke, M. Merzkirch, K. Avery, T. Foecke, High strain rate mechanical characterization of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites using digital image correlations. SAE Int. J. Mater. Manufac. 10(2), 138–146 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    E.M.C. Jones, M.A. Iadicola, (Eds.), International digital image correlation society—a good practices guide for digital image correlation (International Digital Image Correlation Society iDICs, 2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    L.A. Carlsson, R.B. Pipes, Experimental characterization of advanced composite materials, vol 1987 (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    ASTM D5379/D5379M—standard test method for shear properties of composite materials by the v-notched beam method (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    ASTM D3518/D3518M—standard test method for in-plane shear response of polymer matrix composite materials by tensile test of a ±45° laminate (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. Gross, W. Hauger, J. Schröder, W.A. Wall, Technische mechanik 2—elastostatik. 12th edn. Springer-Lehrbuch (Springer, Berlin, 2014)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guest Researcher, NIST Center for Automotive Lightweighting (NCAL)National Institute of Standards and TechnologyGaithersburgUSA

Personalised recommendations