Advertisement

Using the SURF Model to Simulate Fragment Impact on Energetic Materials

  • Xia MaEmail author
  • Brad Clements
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

The Scaled Uniform Reactive Front (SURF) model developed by Menikoff and Shaw (Comb. Theory Model., 2012) is a High Explosive (HE) reactive burn model. It has been shown to accurately model plate impact shock experiments while requiring only a minimal number of calibration parameters. We have implemented SURF into the Eulerian code Pagosa. SURF has been shown to suitably model high-speed impact and accurately capture the entire Shock-to-Detonation Transition (SDT) process. SURF is also able to model short shocks and dead zones, critical for finite sized impactors such those used in fragment impact investigations. Many burn models cannot do this. The success of SURF is derived from it being based on the physics of hotspots, triggered by the leading shock, and thus can naturally account for properties like shock desensitization. SURF needs to be calibrated for each explosive modeled and for that we use plate impact experiments. For the three explosives considered in this work, PBX 9501, PBX 9502 and Composition B, we use the data of Gustavsen and Dattelbaum (Embedded electromagnetic gauge measurements and modeling of shock initiation in the TATB based explosives PBX 9502 and LX-17. LA-UR-01-3339). After discussing the model, its calibration, we apply SURF to model fragment impact experiments where the effects of release waves originating from finite sized impactors is critical. For example, we use SURF to investigate fragment impact on PBX9502, diagnosed using high speed photography, to support our numerical study of the effect of lateral and back surface release wave on the detonation process. SURF is also applied to successfully model ball impact on the explosive PBX 9501. These successes support the notion that SURF is a reliable tool for modeling impacted explosives.

Keywords

Energetic material Material response Detonation Shock physics Modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by ASC-PEM-HE and ASC Safety Program. We gratefully thank Tariq Aslam, Mike Burkett, and Brandon Smith for their support of the project. We also thank the experimental fragment impact team of Lee Perry and plate impact team of Rick Gustavsen and Dana Dattelbaum. Finally, we thank Ralph Menikoff and Sam Shaw for discussions on the SURF model.

References

  1. 1.
    Fields, J.E., Bourne, N.K., Palmer, S.J.P., Walley, S.M., Smallwood, J.M., Gray, P.: Hot-spot ignition mechanisms for explosives and propellants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 15 May 1992.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1992.0034
  2. 2.
    Tarver, C.M., Chidester, S.K., Nichols III, A.L.: Critical conditions for impact- and shock-induced hot spots in solid explosives. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 5794–5799 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Handley, C.A., Lambourn, B.D., Whitworth, N.J., James, H.R., Belfield, W.J.: Understanding the shock and detonationresponse of high explosives at the continuum and meso scales. Appl. Phys. Rev. 5, 011303 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5005997 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Menikoff, R., Shaw, M.S.: The SURF model and the curvature effect for PBX 9502. Comb. Theory Model. (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1080/13647830.2012.713994 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gustavsen, R.L. et al.: Embedded electromagnetic gauge measurements and modeling of shock initiation in the TATB based explosives PBX 9502 and LX-17. LA-UR-01-3339Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chidester, S.K., et al.: Shock Initiation of Damaged Explosives, (2009). LLNL report LLNL-CONF-418560 https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/380356.pdf
  7. 7.
    Pemberton, S.J. et al.: PBX-9501 SMIS shots with 1/2 inch and 5/8 inch round ball ammunition. LANL report: LA-UR-11-06457Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee Perry, W., Clements, B., Ma, X., Mang, J.T.: Relating microstructure, temperature, and chemistry to explosive ignition and shock sensitivity. Combust. Flame. 190, 171–176 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clements, B., Ma, X., Perry, L., Rae, P., Armstrong, C., Haroz, E., Dickson, P.: Shock Initiation Response of PBX 9502 Considering Rarefaction Wave Effects, Proceedings of the 16th Internation Detonation Symposium (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Los Alamos National Laboratory, Mail Stop B216Los AlamosUSA
  2. 2.Los Alamos National Laboratory, Mail Stop P918Los AlamosUSA

Personalised recommendations