Advertisement

Subjectivity, Conflictuality, and Generalization in Social Praxis

  • Erik AxelEmail author
  • Charlotte Højholt
Chapter
Part of the Theory and History in the Human and Social Sciences book series (THHSS)

Abstract

In this chapter, generalization is identified as a subjective process in praxis in which the way praxis is coordinated, the things we deal with in it, and the generalizations develop together. Further, generalizations are regarded as subjective and social at the same time. In this conception, generalizations are about common causes in praxis, and both are concrete as well as contradictory. Moreover, participants have different perspectives on the common causes, which stem from the way they participate in them. The contradictions may play out in different ways in the perspectives. Generalizations are related to concrete conditions in praxis, and as a consequence, our generalizations appear varied in particular ways according to the actual conditions. This theoretical exposition will be elucidated using examples from school life.

Keywords

Praxis Common cause Contradiction Development Generalization Focus Abstraction Flexibility 

References

  1. Axel, E. (2003). Theoretical deliberations on “regulation as productive tool use”. Outlines: Critical Social Studies, 5(1), 31–46.Google Scholar
  2. Axel, E. (2009). What makes us talk about wing nuts? Critical psychology and subjects at work. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 275–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axel, E. (2011). Conflictual cooperation. Nordic Psychology, 63(4), 56–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein, R. J. (1971). Praxis and action. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  5. Busch-Jensen, P. (2015). The production of power in everyday life of organizational practice: Working with conflicts as heuristics. Outlines, 16(2), 15–25.Google Scholar
  6. Busch-Jensen, P. (2018). Skoleledelse: mellem konflikter og samarbejde. In C. Højholt & D. Kousholt (Eds.), Konflikter om børns skoleliv (pp. 126–171). København: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1911/1985). Pedagogical dictionary. In John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1899–1924. Carbondal: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dewey, J. (1929/1958). Nature and experience. Mineola, NY: Dover.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dreier, O. (2008). Psychotherapy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dreier, O. (2019). Generalizations in situated practices. In C. Højholt & E. Schraube (Eds.), Subjectivity and knowledge: Generalization in the psychological study of everyday life (pp. 177–193). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Havemann, R. (1966). Dialektik ohne Dogma (dialectics without dogmatism: Natural sciences against communistic ideology). Aula: Het Spectrum.Google Scholar
  13. Højholt, C. (2016). Situated inequality and the conflictuality of children’s conduct of life. In E. Schraube & C. Højholt (Eds.), Psychology and the conduct of everyday life (pp. 145–163). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Højholt, C., & Kousholt, D. (Eds.). (2018). Konflikter om børns skoleliv. København: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  15. Højholt, C., & Kousholt, D. (2019a). Developing knowledge through participation and collaboration: Research as mutual learning processes. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 17.Google Scholar
  16. Højholt, C. & Kousholt, D. (2019b, In press). Contradictions and conflicts—Researching school as conflictual social practice. Theory & Psychology.Google Scholar
  17. Højholt, C., & Schwartz, I. (2018). Elevsamspil, konflikter og udsathed i skolens fællesskaber. In C. Højholt & D. Kousholt (Eds.), Konflikter om børns skoleliv (pp. 58–91). København: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  18. Holzkamp, K. (2013). Psychology: Social self-understanding on the reasons for action in the conduct of everyday life. In E. Schraube & U. Osterkamp (Eds.), Psychology from the Standpoint of the Subject. Selected Writings of Klaus Holzkamp (pp. 233–341). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays in the livelyhood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Juul Jensen, U. (1999). Categories in activity theory: Marx’s philosophy just-in-time. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. Juul Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice: Cultural-historical approaches (pp. 79–99). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Klitmøller, J., & Nielsen, K. (2017). John Hattie som uddannelsesteoretiker—en kritik af teorien om synlig læring. Dansk pædagogisk tidsskrift, 2, 3–15.Google Scholar
  22. Lave, J. (2019). Situated learning, historical process and practice. In Learning and everyday life: Access, participation, and changing practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Levins, R., & Lewontin, R. (1985). The dialectical biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mardahl-Hansen, T. (2018). Teaching as a social practice. Nordic Psychology, 71, 3.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2018.1457451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1845/1969). Werke (Vol. 3). Berlin: Dietz Verlag.Google Scholar
  28. Ollman, B. (2003). Dance of the dialectic: Steps in Marx’s method. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ollman, B. (2015). Marxism and the philosophy of internal relations; or, how to replace the mysterious ‘paradox’ with ‘contradictions’ that can be studied and resolved. Capital & Class, 39(1), 7–23.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816814564128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Røn Larsen, M. (2019). Interdisciplinary collaboration and conflict concerning children in difficulties—Conditions, procedures and politics of everyday life in school. Annual Review of Critical Psychology.Google Scholar
  31. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Arena.Google Scholar
  32. Schraube, E. (2015). Why theory matters: Analytical strategies of critical psychology. Estudos de Psicologia, 32(3), 533–545.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-166X2015000300018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schraube, E., & Osterkamp, U. (Eds.). (2013). Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Oxford: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  35. Taylor, C. (1975). Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social Psychology of Everyday Life, Department of People and TechnologyRoskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations