Online Diversity Communication at Bank of America

  • Roxana D. Maiorescu-MurphyEmail author


This chapter tackles diversity communication at Bank of America. The analysis reveals that the company should further detail and clarify its diversity approaches in order to enhance the users’ understanding of their impact and importance.


  1. Bank of America. (2018a). Global ambassadors [Data set]. Retrieved from
  2. Bank of America. (2018b). The Bank of America’s institute for women’s Entrepreneurship at Cornell. Retrieved from
  3. Bank of America. (2018c). Advancing women’s leadership and economic empowerment globally [Data set]. Retrieved from
  4. Bank of America. (2018d). Our Global Ambassadors Program invests in women leaders to accelerate their path to leadership. Retrieved from
  5. Boyd, J. (2000). Actional legitimation: No crisis necessary. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(4), 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis: A critical review of its process and evaluation. West East Journal of Sciences, 1(1), 39–47.Google Scholar
  7. Bui, L. (2018). Lawsuit: Bank of America allows foreclosed homes in minority neighborhoods to deteriorate; takes better care of properties in white communities. The Washington Post. Retrieved from
  8. Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deephouse, D. L., Bundy, J., Tost, L. P., & Suchman, M. C. (2017). Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 27–54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dozier, D. M., Grunig, L. A., & Grunig, J. E. (2013). Manager’s guide to excellence in public relations and communication management. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Etter, M., Colleoni, E., Illia, L., Meggiorin, K., & D’Eugenio, A. (2018). Measuring organizational legitimacy in social media: Assessing citizens’ judgments with sentiment analysis. Business & Society, 57(1), 60–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glass, C., & Cook, A. (2016). Leading at the top: Understanding women’s challenges above the glass ceiling. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grabowicz, P. A., Aiello, L. M., Eguíluz, V. M., & Jaimes, A. (2013, February). Distinguishing topical and social groups based on common identity and bond theory. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining (pp. 627–636). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  14. Gürsoy, S., & Yücelen, M. (2018). Efficacy of organizational learning and social capital in online communities of practice: Dualities and intersections. In Geopolitics and strategic management in the global economy (pp. 96–122). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kulich, C., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Iacoviello, V., Faniko, K., & Ryan, M. K. (2015). Signaling change during a crisis: Refining conditions for the glass cliff. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, Y. (2018). Dynamics of symmetrical communication within organizations: The impacts of channel usage of CEO, Managers, and Peers. International Journal of Business Communication
  17. Ma, L., & Zhan, M. (2016). Effects of attributed responsibility and response strategies on organizational reputation: A meta-analysis of situational crisis communication theory research. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28(2), 102–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 335.Google Scholar
  19. Main, B. G., & Gregory-Smith, I. (2018). Symbolic management and the glass cliff: Evidence from the boardroom careers of female and male directors. British Journal of Management, 29(1), 136–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meek, S., Lambert, C., Ryan, M. M., & Ogilvie, M. (2018). Social capital: An influence on critical to success factors in online brand communities. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 14(3), 268–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Norris, P. (2002). The bridging and bonding role of online communities. The Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics, 7(3), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Toole. (2013, January 7). Banks to pay $8.5 billion in foreclosure settlement. CNN. Retrieved from
  23. Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Petroff, A. (2013, September 24). Bank of America fined $2.2 million for race discrimination. Retrieved from
  25. Ren, Y., Kraut, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, 28(3), 377–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schoen, J.W. (2013, June 17). Bank of America paid bonuses to foreclose: Lawsuit. CNBC. Retrieved from
  27. Tausczik, Y. R., Dabbish, L. A., & Kraut, R. E. (2014, February). Building loyalty to online communities through bond and identity-based attachment to sub-groups. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 146–157). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  28. Vătămănescu, E. M., Andrei, A. G., & Pînzaru, F. (2018). Investigating the online social network development through the Five Cs Model of Similarity: The Facebook case. Information Technology & People, 31(1), 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Emerson CollegeBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations