Advertisement

New Directions for Theory and Practice

  • Roxana D. Maiorescu-MurphyEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses the results of a comparison across industries, introduces a model for the implementation of online diversity communication, and tackles the limitations of the current book. Finally, the chapter gives directions for future research.

References

  1. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.Google Scholar
  2. Alcázar, F. M., Fernández, P. M. R., & Gardey, G. S. (2013). Workforce diversity in strategic human resource management models: A critical review of the literature and implications for future research. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 20(1), 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2014). From “smart objects” to “social objects”: The next evolutionary step of the internet of things. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(1), 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin, E. W., & Pinkleton, B. E. (2015). Strategic public relations management: Planning and managing effective communication campaigns. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauernschuster, S., Falck, O., & Woessmann, L. (2014). Surfing alone? The internet and social capital: Evidence from an unforeseeable technological mistake. Journal of Public Economics, 117, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouchillon, B. C. (2014). Social ties and generalized trust, online and in person: Contact or conflict—The mediating role of bonding social capital in America. Social Science Computer Review, 32(4), 506–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouchillon, B. C. (2018). Patching the melting pot: Sociability in Facebook groups for engagement, trust, and perceptions of difference. Social Science Computer Review.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318791241
  8. Brunner, B. R., & Brown, M. H. (2008). Crisis response?: Auburn University’s struggles with diversity. International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities and Nations, 8(4), 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ciszek, E. (2019). “We are people, not transactions”: Trust as a precursor to dialogue with LGBTQ publics. Public Relations Review.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.02.003
  10. Coombs, W. T. (2019). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Cuesta-Valiño, P., Rodríguez, P. G., & Núñez-Barriopedro, E. (2019). The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty in hypermarkets: A new socially responsible strategy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.  https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1718
  12. Deetz, S. A. (2000). Conceptual foundations. In F. Jablin & L. Putnam (Eds.), Engaging organizational communication theory: Multiple perspectives (pp. 85–111). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Deetz, S. A. (2004). Critical theory. In S. May & D. Mumby (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication. Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 3–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Dozier, D. M., Grunig, L. A., & Grunig, J. E. (2013). Manager’s guide to excellence in public relations and communication management. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Einwiller, A. A., & Steilen, S. (2015). Handling complaints on social network sites—An analysis of complaints and complaints responses on Facebook and Twitter pages of large US companies. Public Relations Review, 41, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glenn, C. L. (2015). Activism or “slacktivism?”: Digital media and organizing for social change. Communication Teacher, 29(2), 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greene, A. M., & Kirton, G. (2015). The dynamics of managing diversity: A critical approach. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Grunig, J. E. (2006). Furnishing the edifice: Ongoing research on public relations as a strategic management function. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(2), 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (2016). Toward a theory of the public relations behavior of organizations: Review of a program of research. In J. E. Grunig & L. A. Grunig (Eds.), Public relations research annual (pp. 37–74). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holtzhausen, D. R. (2000). Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoobler, J. M., Masterson, C. R., Nkomo, S. M., & Michel, E. J. (2018). The business case for women leaders: Meta-analysis, research critique, and path forward. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2473–2499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang, H. Y. (2016). Examining the beneficial effects of individual’s self-disclosure on the social network site. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 122–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hunt, V., Prince, S., Dixon-Fyle, S., & Yee, L. (2018). Delivering through diversity. McKinsey and Company Report. Retrieved from https://mck.co/2DPv3YP
  24. Knights, D., & Omanović, V. (2016). (Mis)managing diversity: Exploring the dangers of diversity management orthodoxy. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 35(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krishna, A., Kim, S., & Shim, K. (2019). Unpacking the effects of alleged gender discrimination in the corporate workplace on consumers’ affective responses and relational perceptions. Communication Research.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218784483
  26. Larson, S. (2017, November 7). Welcome to a world with 280-character tweets. CNN. Retrieved from https://cnn.it/2YSVsyy
  27. Maiorescu, R. (2015). Public relations for the bereaved: Online interactions in a community for stillbirth and neonatal death charity. Public Relations Review, 41(2), 293–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maiorescu, R. D., & Wrigley, B. J. (2016). Diversity in multinational corporations. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mundy, D. E. (2015). Diversity 2.0: How the public relation function can take the lead in a new generation of diversity and inclusion (DandI) initiatives. Research Journal of the Institute for Public Relations, 2(2), 1–35.Google Scholar
  30. Mundy, D. E. (2016). Bridging the divide: A multidisciplinary analysis of diversity research and the implications for public relations. Research Journal of the Institute for Public Relations, 3(1). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2PUF50l
  31. Nitins, T., & Burgess, J. (2014). Twitter, brands, and user engagement. In Twitter and society (Vol. 89, pp. 293–304). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  32. Perez, S. (2018, October 30). Twitter’s doubling of characters count from 140 to 280 had little impact on length of tweets. Tech Crunch. Retrieved from https://tcrn.ch/2JMpmyu
  33. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rachele, J. S. (2017). Dismantling diversity management: Introducing an ethical performance improvement campaign. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramirez, S. A. (2018). Diversity and ethics: Toward an objective business compliance function. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 49, 569–595.Google Scholar
  36. Ren, Y., Harper, F. M., Drenner, S., Terveen, L. G., Kiesler, S. B., Riedl, J., et al. (2012). Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 841–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ren, Y., Kraut, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, 28(3), 377–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shahin, S., & Dai, Z. (2019). Understanding public engagement with global aid agencies on Twitter: A technosocial framework. American Behavioral Scientist.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219835248
  39. Smith, B. G., Krishna, A., & Al-Sinan, R. (2019). Beyond slacktivism: Examining the entanglement between social media engagement, empowerment, and participation in activism. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1–15.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, R. D. (2017). Strategic planning for public relations (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stacks, D. W. (2016). Primer of public relations research. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  42. Toledano, M. (2018). Dialogue, strategic communication, and ethical public relations: Lessons from Martin Buber’s political activism. Public Relations Review, 44(1), 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Uysal, N. (2013). Shifting the paradigm: Diversity communication on corporate web sites. Public Relations Journal, 7(2), 8–36.Google Scholar
  44. Wondrak, M., & Segert, A. (2015). Using the diversity impact navigator to move from interventions towards diversity management strategies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(1), 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wrench, J. (2005). Diversity management can be bad for you. Institute of Race Relations, 46(3), 73–84.Google Scholar
  46. Yang, F., & Ott, H. K. (2016). What motivates the public? The power of social norms in driving public participation with organizations. Public Relations Review, 42(5), 832–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Emerson CollegeBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations