Advertisement

Conclusions from the Consumer Goods Industry

  • Roxana D. Maiorescu-MurphyEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Despite the fact that Johnson & Johnson and Altria are classified as belonging to the consumer goods industries, their divergent business profiles made it impossible to compare their communication strategies. Consequently, this chapter discusses the main implications of the results that emerged for each company, without making analogies or drawing conclusions across the industry.

References

  1. Alcázar, F. M., Fernández, P. M. R., & Gardey, G. S. (2013). Workforce diversity in strategic human resource management models: A critical review of the literature and implications for future research. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 20(1), 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. An, J., Do, D. K. X., Ngo, L. V., & Quan, T. H. M. (2019). Turning brand credibility into positive word-of-mouth: Integrating the signaling and social identity perspectives. Journal of Brand Management, 26(2), 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aqueveque, C., Rodrigo, P., & Duran, I. J. (2018). Be bad but (still) look good: Can controversial industries enhance corporate reputation through CSR initiatives? Business Ethics: A European Review, 27(3), 222–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bachmann, P., & Ingenhoff, D. (2016). Legitimacy through CSR disclosures? The advantage outweighs the disadvantages. Public Relations Review, 42(3), 386–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bledsoe, T. S., Pacino, M. A., & Warren, S. R. (2018). Tackling diversity: A framework to promote dialogue on college campuses. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 25, 3.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, N., & Deegan, C. (1998). The public disclosure of environmental performance information—A dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 29(1), 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrd, M. Y. (2018). Diversity branding strategy: Concealing implicit stereotypes and biased behaviors. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20(3), 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byrd, M. Y., & Hughes, C. (2018). A paradigm shift for diversity management: From promoting business opportunity to optimizing lived career work experiences. In Business education and ethics: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 1233–1259). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ciszek, E. (2019, in press). We are people, not transactions: Trust as a precursor to dialogue with LGBTQ publics. Public Relations Review.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.02.003
  10. Greene, A. M., & Kirton, G. (2015). The dynamics of managing diversity: A critical approach. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Grougiou, V., Dedoulis, E., & Leventis, S. (2016). Corporate social responsibility reporting and organizational stigma: The case of “sin” industries. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 905–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hsu, T. (2018, December 19). Johnson & Johnson loses bid to overturn a $4.7 billion baby powder verdict. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://nyti.ms/2R5WzdK
  13. Kim, J., & Kim, I. (2018). Moral imagination, Parasocial brand love, and customer citizenship behavior: Travelers’ relationship with sponsoring airline brands in the United States. Sustainability, 10(12), 4391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kreiner, G. E., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kujur, F., & Singh, S. (2019). Antecedents of relationship between customer and organization developed through social networking sites. Management Research Review, 42(1), 2–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maiorescu, R. D., & Wrigley, B. J. (2016). Diversity in multinational corporations. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Matei, S. A., & Bruno, R. J. (2015). Pareto’s 80/20 law and social differentiation: A social entropy perspective. Public Relations Review, 41(2), 178–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCombs, M. (2018). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  19. McDaniel, P. A., Lown, E. A., & Malone, R. E. (2018). US media coverage of tobacco industry corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Community Health, 43(1), 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Osuna Ramírez, S. A., Veloutsou, C., & Morgan-Thomas, A. (2019). I hate what you love: Brand polarization and negativity towards brands as an opportunity for brand management. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 28(5), 614–632.Google Scholar
  21. Palazzo, G., & Richter, U. (2005). CSR business as usual? The case of the tobacco industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vollero, A., Palazzo, M., Siano, A., & Sardanelli, D. (2018). Managing CSR communication: A study of legitimacy-seeking strategies adopted by service and product companies. The TQM Journal, 30(5), 621–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wieczner, J. (2017, June 7). The fortune 500’s 10 most profitable companies. Fortune. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2sD2CaG
  24. Wondrak, M., & Segert, A. (2015). Using the diversity impact navigator to move from interventions towards diversity management strategies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(1), 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wrench, J. (2005). Diversity management can be bad for you. Race & Class, 46(3), 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zarantonello, L., Romani, S., Grappi, S., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2016). Brand hate. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 25(1), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Emerson CollegeBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations