Advertisement

Evaluation of Preamble Detection in ETSI SmartBAN PHY

  • Kento Takabayashi
  • Hirokazu Tanaka
  • Katsumi Sakakibara
Conference paper
  • 33 Downloads
Part of the EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing book series (EAISICC)

Abstract

This chapter provides an evaluation of preamble detection in the ETSI Smart Body Area Networks (SmartBAN) physical layer (PHY). The system specifications for a PHY and a media access control layer (MAC) in SmartBAN, which is a standard for medical and health care advanced by the European Telecommunications Standards Organization (ETSI), were issued in April 2015. In the PHY, the packet structure has a two-octet preamble used for timing synchronization and so on. However, the preamble detection cannot be sufficiently performed except in a very good channel condition because the preamble structure is too simple. For the reason, we propose to add a Start Frame Delimiter (SFD) to correctly detect the position of the header. Computer simulations show that preambles with SFD consisting of an orthogonal M-sequence have better performance than that of SmartBAN and so on, especially under IEEE model CM3.

Keywords

ETSI SmartBAN Preamble detection PHY PN sequence 

References

  1. 1.
    Costa, C.R., Anido-Rifón, L.E., Fernández-Iglesias, M.J.: An open architecture to support social and health services in a smart TV environment. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 21(2), 549–560 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, M., Gonzalez, S., Vasilakos, A., Cao, H., Leung, V.C.M.: Body area networks: a survey. Mobile Netw. Appl. 16(2), 171–193 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cao, H., Leung, V., Chow, C., Chan, H.: Enabling technologies for wireless body area networks: a survey and outlook. IEEE Commun. Mag. 47(12), 84–93 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caldeira, J.M.L.P., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C., Lorenz, P.: Toward ubiquitous mobility solutions for body sensor networks on healthcare. IEEE Commun. Mag. 50(5), 108–115 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cavallari, R., Martelli, F., Rosini, R., Buratti, C., Verdone, R.: A survey on wireless body area networks: technologies and design challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts. 16(3), 1635–1657 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Movassaghi, S., Abolhasan, M., Lipman, J., Smith, D., Jamalipour, A.: Wireless body area networks: a survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts. 16(3), 1658–1686 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) used in or 12 around a body. IEEE Standard for Information technology—telecommunications and information exchange between systems—local and metropolitan area networks—specific requirements: Part 15.6 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smart Body Area Network (SmartBAN), Low Complexity Medium Access Control (MAC) for SmartBAN. ETSI TC Smart BAN TS 103 325 V1.1.1 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smart Body Area Network (SmartBAN), Enhanced Ultra-Low Power Physical Layer. ETSI TC Smart BAN TS 103 326 V1.1.1 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Takabayashi, K., Tanaka, H., Sakakibara, K.: Performance evaluation of error control scheme in ETSI SmartBAN PHY. In: The 2018 Global IoT Summit (GIoTS 2018), Bilbao, Spain (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yazdandoost, K.Y., Sayrafi-an-Pour, K.: Channel model for Body Area Net-work (BAN). IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs), IEEE P802.15-08-0780-10-0006 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khan, R., Alam, M.M.: Joint PHY-MAC realistic performance evaluation of body-to-body communication in IEEE 802.15.6 and SmartBAN. In: The 12th International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology (ISMICT 2018), pp. 137–142, Sydney, Australia, (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D’Souza, A., Viittala, H., Hämäläinen, M., Mucci, L.: Performance comparison between ETSI SmartBAN and Bluetooth. In: The 12th International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology (ISMICT 2018), pp. 143–147, Sydney, Australia (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Seberry, J., Yamada, M.: Hadamard matrices, sequences, and block designs. In: Stinson, D.J., Dinitz, J. (eds.) Contemporary Design Theory—A Collection of Surveys, pp. 431–560. Wiley, New Jersey (1992)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Habuchi, H.: Pseudo-noise sequences based on M-sequence and its application for communications. IEICE Fundam. Rev. 3(1), 32–42 (2009). in JapaneseCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kento Takabayashi
    • 1
  • Hirokazu Tanaka
    • 2
  • Katsumi Sakakibara
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science and Systems EngineeringOkayama Prefectural UniversityOkayamaJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Information SciencesHiroshima City UniversityHiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations