Advertisement

Can Virtual Humans Teach Empathy?

  • Benjamin LokEmail author
  • Adriana E. Foster
Chapter

Abstract

Millennial and generation X learners seek and accept technology-based teaching. In healthcare, such technology includes virtual standardized patients. Virtual human technology was created and tested to teach communication skills, including empathy, in patient encounters. With the help of learners as content experts (dental, medical, speech pathology, and pharmacy students and faculty), our team developed virtual standardized patient scenarios related to neurology, surgery, mental health, and other medical specialties, to offer practice opportunities for history taking, critical thinking, and empathic communication. We will describe the virtual human technology, including its properties suited to provide immediate empathy feedback in real time, to teach and reinforce empathic communication longitudinally, and to reach a large number of learners who can practice and reinforce the skill repetitively and cost effectively.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence Deliberate practice Empathy Empathic opportunity Empathic Communication Coding System Multimedia Standardized patient Virtual patient Virtual standardized patient 

References

  1. 1.
    Kononowicz, A. A., Zary, N., Edelbring, S., Corral, J., & Hege, I. (2015). Virtual patients - what are we talking about? A framework to classify the meanings of the term in healthcare education. BMC Medical Education, 15, 11.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0296-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rossen, B., Lind, S., & Lok, B. (2009). Human-centered distributed conversational modeling: Efficient modeling of robust virtual human conversations. In Z. Ruttkay, M. Kipp, A. Nijholt, & H. H. Vilhjálmsson (Eds.), Intelligent virtual agents (pp. 474–481). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnsen, K., Raij, A., Stevens, A., Lind, D., & Lok, B. (2007). The validity of a virtual human experience for interpersonal skills education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1049–1058). New York, NY: ACM Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deladisma, A. M., Cohen, M., Stevens, A., Wagner, P., Lok, B., Bernard, T., et al. (2007). Do medical learners respond empathetically to a virtual patient? The American Journal of Surgery, 193(6), 756–760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnsen, K., & Lok, B. (2008). An evaluation of immersive displays for virtual human experiences. In IEEE Virtual Reality, (short paper) March 10–12, Reno, NV (pp. 133–136).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chuah, J., Robb, A., White, C., Wendling, A., Lampotang, S., Kopper, R., et al. (2013). Exploring agent physicality and social presence for medical team training. Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 22(2), 141–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duff, E., Miller, L., & Bruce, J. (2016). Online virtual simulation and diagnostic reasoning: A scoping review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(9), 377–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peden, M., Chuah, J., Kotranza, A., Johnsen, K., Lok, B., & Cendan, J. (2011). NERVE- A three-dimensional patient simulation for evaluating cranial nerve function. MedEdPORTAL, 7, 8255.  https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.8255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foster, A., Robb, A., Cordar, A., Chaudhary, N., Noseworthy, D., & Lok, B. (2015). Denise: A virtual patient. MedEdPORTAL, 11, 10145.  https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berman, N. B., Durning, S. J., Fischer, M. R., Huwendiek, S., & Triola, M. M. (2016). The role for virtual patients in the future of medical education. Academic Medicine, 91(9), 1217–1222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dickerson, R., Johnsen, K., Raij, A., Lok, B., Hernandez, J., Stevens, A., et al. (2005). Evaluating a script-based approach for simulating patient-doctor interaction. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Human-Computer Interface Advances for Modeling and Simulation (Vol. 1, pp. 79–84). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kotranza, A., Lok, B., Pugh, C. M., & Lind, D. S. (2009). Virtual humans that touch back: Enhancing nonverbal communication with virtual humans through bidirectional touch. In Virtual Reality Conference. VR 2009. IEEE 2009 Mar 14 (pp. 175–178). IEEE.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shah, H., Rossen, B., Lok, B., Londino, D., Lind, S., & Foster, A. (2012). Interactive virtual-patient scenarios: An evolving tool in psychiatric education. Academic Psychiatry, 6(2), 146–150.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Foster, A., Chaudhary, N., Kim, T., Waller, J. L., Wong, J., Borish, M., et al. (2016). Using virtual patients to teach empathy: A randomized controlled study to enhance medical learners’ empathic communication. Simulation in Healthcare, 11(3), 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cordar, A., Borish, M., Foster, A., & Lok, B. (2014). Building virtual humans with back-stories: Training interpersonal communication skills in medical learners. In International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (pp. 144–153). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Borish, M., Cordar, A., Foster, A., Kim, T., Murphy, J., Chaudhary, N., et al. (2014). Utilizing real-time human-assisted virtual humans to increase real-world interaction empathy. In Proceedings of the 5th Kanesi Engineering and Emotion Research International Conference (No. 100, pp. 441–455). Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Foster, A., Chaudhary, N., Murphy, J., Lok, B., Waller, J., & Buckley, P. F. (2015). The use of simulation to teach suicide risk assessment to health professions trainees: Rationale, methodology and a proof of concept demonstration with a virtual patient. Academic Psychiatry, 39(6), 620–629.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fallucco, E. M., Hanson, M. D., & Glowinski, A. L. (2010). Teaching pediatric residents to assess adolescent suicide risk with a standardized patient module. Pediatrics, 125(5), 953–959.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fiedorowicz, J. G., Tate, J., Miller, A. C., Franklin, E. M., Gourley, R., & Rosenbaum, M. (2013). A medical interviewing curriculum intervention for medical students’ assessment of suicide risk. Academic Psychiatry, 37(6), 398–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Adamo, G. (2003). Simulated and standardized patients in OSCEs: Achievements and challenges 1992-2003. Medical Teacher, 25(3), 262–270.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hanson, M. D., Niec, A., Pietrantonio, A. M., et al. (2007). Effects associated with adolescent standardized patient simulation of depression and suicidal ideation. Academic Medicine, 82(10 suppl), S61–S64.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cook, D. A., & Triola, M. M. (2009). Virtual patients: A critical literature review and proposed next steps. Medical Education, 43(4), 303–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kleinsmith, A., Rivera-Gutierrez, D., Finney, G., Cendan, J., & Lok, B. (2015). Understanding empathy training with virtual patients. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 151–158.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Forsberg, E., Georg, C., Ziegert, K., & Fors, U. (2011). Virtual patients for assessment of clinical reasoning in nursing—A pilot study. Nurse Education Today, 31(8), 757–762.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Guise, V., Chambers, M., & Välimäki, M. (2012). What can virtual patient simulation offer mental health nursing education? Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 19(5), 410–418.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    LeFlore, J. L., Anderson, M., Zielke, M. A., Nelson, K. A., Thomas, P. E., Hardee, G., et al. (2012). Can a virtual patient trainer teach student nurses how to save lives—Teaching nursing students about pediatric respiratory diseases. Simulation in Healthcare, 7(1), 10–17.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kiegaldie, D., & White, G. (2006). The virtual patient-development, implementation and evaluation of an innovative computer simulation for postgraduate nursing students. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15(1), 31–47.5.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ericsson, K. A., Prietula, M. J., & Cokely, E. T. (2007). The making of an expert. Harvard Business Review, 85(7/8), 114.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lisetti, C., Amini, R., Yasavur, U., & Rishe, N. (2013). I can help you change! An empathic virtual agent delivers behavior change health interventions. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 4(4), 19.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    DeVault, D., Artstein, R., Benn, G., Dey, T., Fast, E., Gainer, A., et al. (2014). A virtual human interviewer for healthcare decision support. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (Vol. 5, pp. 1061–1068). Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dillon, G. F., Clyman, S. G., Clauser, B. E., & Margolis, M. J. (2002). The introduction of computer-based case simulations into the United States medical licensing examination. Academic Medicine, 77(10), S94–S96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Prober, C. G., & Khan, S. (2013). Medical education reimagined: A call to action. Academic Medicine, 88(10), 1407–1410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Morse, J. M., Anderson, G., Bottorff, J. L., Yonge, O., O’Brien, B., Solberg, S. M., et al. (1992). Exploring empathy: A conceptual fit for nursing practice? Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 24(4), 273–280.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hojat, M., Gonnella, J. S., Nasca, T. J., Mangione, S., Vergare, M., & Magee, M. (2002). Physician empathy: Definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159(9), 1563–1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stewart, M. A. (1995). Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: A review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 152, 1423–1433.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rakel, D., Barrett, B., Zhang, Z., Hoeft, T., Chewning, B., Marchand, L., et al. (2011). Perception of empathy in the therapeutic encounter: Effects on the common cold. Patient Education and Counseling, 85, 390–397.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hojat, M., Louis, D. Z., Markham, F. W., Wender, R., Rabinowitz, C., & Gonnella, J. S. (2011). Physicians’ empathy and outcomes for diabetic patients. Academic Medicine, 86, 359–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Del Canale, S., Louis, D. Z., Maio, V., Wang, X., Rossi, G., Hojat, M., et al. (2012). The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications: An empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma, Italy. Academic Medicine, 87(9), 1243–1249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mercer, S. W., & Reynolds, W. J. (2002). Empathy and quality of care. The British Journal of General Practice, 52(Suppl), S9–S12.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Batt-Rawden, S. A., Chisolm, M. S., Anton, B., & Flickinger, T. E. (2013). Teaching empathy to medical students: An updated, systematic review. Academic Medicine, 88(8), 1171–1177.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Foster, A., Trieu, M., Azutillo, E., Halan, S., & Lok, B. (2017). Teaching empathy in healthcare: From mirror neurons to education technology. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 2(2), 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Stevens, A., Hernandez, J., Johnsen, K., Dickerson, R., Raij, A., Harrison, C., et al. (2006). The use of virtual patients to teach medical students history taking and communication skills. The American Journal of Surgery, 191(6), 806–811.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bylund, C. L., & Makoul, G. (2002). Empathic communication and gender in the physician–patient encounter. Patient Education and Counseling, 48(3), 207–216.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bonvicini, K. A., Perlin, M. J., Bylund, C. L., Carroll, G., Rouse, R. A., & Goldstein, M. G. (2009). Impact of communication training on physician expression of empathy in patient encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 75(1), 3–10.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Halan, S., Sia, I., Crary, M., & Lok, B. (2015). Exploring the effects of healthcare learners creating virtual patient for empathy training. In W.-P. Brinkman, J. Broekens, & D. Heylen (Eds.), Intelligent virtual agents (Vol. 9238, pp. 239–249). Cham: Springer International Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21996-7_24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    DiGioia 3rd, A., Lorenz, H., Greenhouse, P. K., Bertoty, D. A., & Rocks, S. D. (2010). A patient-centered model to improve metrics without cost increase: Viewing all care through the eyes of patients and families. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 40(12), 540Y546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wilkes, M., Milgrom, E., & Hoffman, J. R. (2002). Towards more empathic medical learners: A medical learner hospitalization experience. Medical Education, 36, 528Y533.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Henry-Tillman, R., Deloney, L. A., Savidge, M., Graham, C. J., & Klimberg, V. S. (2002). The medical learner as patient navigator as an approach to teaching empathy. American Journal of Surgery, 183, 659Y662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bickmore, T., Marsella, S., & Sidner, C. (Eds.) (2014, August 27–29). Intelligent virtual agents. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference, IVA 2014, Boston, MA, USA. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ericsson, K. A. (2008). Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), 988–994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Goodchild, C. E., Skinner, T. C., & Parkin, T. (2005). The value of empathy in dietetic consultations: A pilot study to investigate its effect on satisfaction, autonomy and agreement. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 18, 181–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Di Gioia, A., & Greenhouse, P. (2011). Patient and family shadowing: Creating urgency for change. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 41, 23Y28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering DepartmentCollege of Engineering, University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral HealthHerbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations