Advertisement

Mesh-Based Design to Fabrication Workflows for Funicular Structures: A Case Study

  • Tommaso CasucciEmail author
  • Ryan Hughes
  • Jens Pedersen
  • David Reeves
  • Vishu Bhooshan
  • Shajay Bhooshan
Conference paper
  • 505 Downloads

Abstract

Funicular shells have found large interest amongst architectural designers for their advantageous structural properties allowing them to cover large spans through the use of relatively weak and readily-available materials.

Although the properties of funicular structures are well-known and their efficiency well documented, the interdependencies of the multiple constraints present in real-world projects, from form-finding and rationalization to fabrication and assembly, mean that the realization of these structures remains a challenge.

This paper presents a unified design-to-fabrication workflow for funicular structures that adopts the Half-Edge (HE) mesh data structure throughout the entire design process from early-stage design to robotic fabrication.

The research contributes advancements in the fast early-stage design exploration of structure- and fabrication-aware proposals as well as the generation of voussoir geometry through mesh segmentation to the rationalization and documentation of geometric information for manufacturing and assembly.

The advancements are presented through the description of a case study, a proof-of-concept funicular vault manufactured using the Robotic Hot Wire Cutting (RHWC) method.

Keywords

Funicular design Geometry processing Half-Edge mesh Stereotomy Optimization Robotic wire cutting 

References

  1. 1.
    Block, P.P.C.V.: Thrust network analysis: exploring three-dimensional equilibrium (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rippmann, M.: Funicular Shell Design - geometric approaches to form finding and fabrication of discrete funicular structures. ETH (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhooshan, S.: Combining computer-aided geometry design and building information modelling. AD Archit. Des. 87(3), 82–89 (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miller, N., Stasiuk, D.: A novel mesh-based workflow for complex geometry in BIM. In: Disciplines and Disruption - Proceedings Catalog of the 37th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, ACADIA 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oval, R., Rippmann, M., Mesnil, R., Van Mele, T., Baverel, O., Block, P.: Feature-based topology finding of patterns for shell structures. Autom. Constr. (2019)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rippmann, M., Block, P.: Computational tessellation of freeform, cut-stone vaults. Nexus Netw. J. 20, 545–566 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rippmann, M., Block, P.: Digital stereotomy: voussoir geometry for freeform masonry-like vaults informed by structural and fabrication constraints. In: IABSE-IASS2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rippmann, M., et al.: The Armadillo Vault: computational design and digital fabrication of a freeform stone shell. In: Advances in Architectural Geometry 2016, pp. 344–363 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McGee, W., Feringa, J., Søndergaard, A.: Processes for an architecture of volume. In: Rob|Arch 2012 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deuss, M., et al.: Assembling self-supporting structures. ACM Trans. Graph. (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adriaenssens, S., Block, P., Veenendaal, D., Williams, C.: Shell Structures for Architecture: Form Finding and Optimization (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bhooshan, V., Reeves, D., Bhooshan, S., Block, P.: MayaVault—a mesh modelling environment for discrete funicular structures. Nexus Netw. J. 20, 567–582 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vouga, E., Höbinger, M., Wallner, J., Pottmann, H.: Design of self-supporting surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 31, 87 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deuss, M., Deleuran, A.H., Bouaziz, S., Deng, B., Piker, D., Pauly, M.: ShapeOp—a robust and extensible geometric modelling paradigm. In: Modelling Behaviour (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fallacara, G.: Toward a stereotomic design: experimental constructions and didactic experiences. In: Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Construction History (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Botsch, M., Steinberg, S., Bischoff, S., Kobbelt, L.: OpenMesh - a generic and efficient polygon mesh data structure. In: OpenSG Symposium (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rippmann, M., Block, P.: Rethinking structural masonry: unreinforced, stone-cut shells. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng.-Constr. Mater. 166, 378–389 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jolliffe, I.T.: Principal Component Analysis, 2nd edn. (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tommaso Casucci
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ryan Hughes
    • 2
  • Jens Pedersen
    • 3
  • David Reeves
    • 4
  • Vishu Bhooshan
    • 1
  • Shajay Bhooshan
    • 1
  1. 1.Computational and Design Research Group (ZHCODE)Zaha Hadid ArchitectsLondonEngland
  2. 2.Axis ConsultingAarhusDenmark
  3. 3.Odico Formwork RoboticsOdenseDenmark
  4. 4.DNEGLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations