Advertisement

Continuous Robotic Spatial 3D Printing of Topologically Irregular Space Frames

  • Daniel Piker
  • Richard MaddockEmail author
Conference paper
  • 517 Downloads

Abstract

Spatial 3D printing via robotic extrusion can offer advantages over conventional layered additive manufacturing, both in speed and strength. However, spatial 3D printing comes with its own challenges such as collision avoidance and sequencing. Overcoming these issues means that a topological path finding problem must also be addressed.

Prior examples of spatially printed space frames, although sometimes forming curved surfaces, have been made up of repeating units arranged in regular grids. This consistent topology ensures simple path planning and sequencing but offers limited scope for geometric freedom and structural optimisation.

For structural reasons it can be advantageous to locally vary the density and topology of a space frame in response to the stress distribution. This generally leads to space frames with an irregular topology which makes efficient sequencing for printing purposes difficult. In contrast to previous work, our novel method allows for topological variation while still ensuring printing in a continuous path is possible. As a proof of concept, we successfully printed a two-metre tall prototype that demonstrates the efficacy of our method.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Topology optimisation Space frames Spatial 3D printing Robotic extrusion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are deeply indebted to Jan Dierckx and Giannis Nikas from Foster + Partners’ Specialist Modelling Group for their advice, expertise and work producing the prototype. We are also grateful for the help and support of Foster + Partners and the Specialist Modelling Group, in particular Sam Wilkinson and Josh Mason.

References

  1. AI Build: Deadalus. https://ai-build.com/daedalus.html. Accessed 20 June 2019
  2. Branch Technology: One City Pavilion. https://www.branch.technology/projects-1/2018/11/8/one-city-pavilion. Accessed 20 June 2019
  3. Euler, L.: Solutio Problematis ad geometriam situs pertinentis. Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae 8, 128–140 (1736)Google Scholar
  4. Felder, A., Lewis, H., Piker, D., Pereira, A., De Kestelier, X.: Mechano-adaptive space frame generation based on ellipsoid packing (2016)Google Scholar
  5. Hierholzer, C., Wiener, C.: Ueber die Möglichkeit, einen Linienzug ohne Wiederholung und ohne Unterbrechung zu umfahren. Math. Ann. 6(1), 30–32 (1873).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01442866CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang, Y., Carstensen, J., Mueller, C., Tessmer, L.: Robotic extrusion of architectural structures with nonstandard topology (2018)Google Scholar
  7. Shelton, T.: Cellular fabrication: branch technology, 2014–Present 1.  https://doi.org/10.1080/24751448.2017.1354636
  8. Tsuboi, Y., du Chateau, S., L. Dean, D., Gutkowski, W., Hangai, Y., Heki, K., P. Popov, E., et al.: Analysis, design & realization of space frames 25 (1984)Google Scholar
  9. Vorsatz, J., Rössl, C., Seidel, H.-P.: Dynamic remeshing and applications. In: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Symposium on Solid Modelling and Applications - SM 2003, p. 167 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1145/781606.781633

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Foster + Partners, Specialist Modelling GroupLondonUK

Personalised recommendations