Advertisement

APACHES: Human-Centered and Project-Based Methods in Higher Education

  • Mathieu VermeulenEmail author
  • Abir Karami
  • Anthony Fleury
  • François Bouchet
  • Nadine Mandran
  • Jannik Laval
  • Jean-Marc Labat
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11722)

Abstract

Human-centered project-based teaching methods have proved their efficiency and popularity in the last decade. Such practice emphasizes the existence of interdisciplinary skills that students manipulate and incrementally learn to master throughout their higher education curriculum. This paper addresses some questions around the integration and evaluation of interdisciplinary skills. The first question focuses on the establishment of a skill-based approach to keep track of the students’ competencies over human-centered computing skills all along their curriculum. To this end, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of existing approaches in the context of agile practices and interdisciplinary skills in human-centered project-based teaching methods. The second question deals with the tools that can accompany such approach and how they can affect the teaching courses, the university instructors’ habits and the motivation of the students. A semi-structured interviews were conducted with five instructors regarding these two questions. One main conclusion is the need to keep track of the students progress during the courses to help an efficient follow up. For this end, we propose to co-design a framework named APACHES.

Keywords

Human centered computer sciences Agile project Traceability Skill based approach Learning analytic 

References

  1. 1.
    Ferguson, R.: Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. Int. J. Technol. Enhanced Learn. 4(5–6), 304–317 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heller, J., Steiner, C., Hockemeyer, C., Albert, D.: Competence-based knowledge structures for personalised learning. Int. J. E-learning 5(1), 75–88 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mandran, N., Dupuy-Chessa, S.: THEDRE: a traceable process for high quality in human centred computer science research. In: Paspallis, N. et al. (eds.) Information Systems Development: Advances in Methods, Tools and Management (ISD2017 Proceedings), Lanarca, Cyprus (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Muller, M.J., Kuhn, S.: Participatory design. Commun. ACM 36(6), 24–28 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vermeulen, M., Fleury, A., Fronton, K., Laval, J.: LES ALPES: Approches agiles pour l’enseignement supérieur. In: QPES 2015 Conference (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xhakaj, F., Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M.: Effects of a teacher dashboard for an intelligent tutoring system on teacher knowledge, lesson planning, lessons and student learning. In: Lavoué, É., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Broisin, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2017. LNCS, vol. 10474, pp. 315–329. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IMT Lille Douai, Université de LilleLilleFrance
  2. 2.FGES-Université Catholique de LilleLilleFrance
  3. 3.Sorbonne Université, CNRS, LIP6ParisFrance
  4. 4.Université Grenoble ALPESGrenobleFrance
  5. 5.DISP, Université Lyon 2LyonFrance

Personalised recommendations