Investigating In-Service Teachers’ Concerns About Adopting Technology-Enhanced Embodied Learning

  • Yiannis GeorgiouEmail author
  • Andri Ioannou
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11722)


Despite the affordances of technology-enhanced embodied learning, its integration in mainstream education is currently at slow pace given that in-service teachers are reluctant to adopt this innovation. This exploratory study investigated the concerns of 31 in-service primary education teachers, who took part in a Professional Development (PD) programme, using a questionnaire grounded in the Concerns Based Adoption Model (CBAM) about the adoption of technology-enhanced embodied learning. The findings of this study indicated that, at the outset of the PD programme, the participating teachers had relatively few personal and management concerns; in contrast, they were highly concerned about obtaining more information, collaborating with other colleagues as well as about expanding the innovation further. Teachers’ participation in the PD programme had a significant impact on the mitigation of these concerns. By the end of the PD programme teachers retained only some high-level concerns, which are essential for the sustainability of technology-enhanced embodied learning.


Technology-enhanced embodied learning Concerns-based adoption model Teacher attitudes Teacher professional development 



This work is part of the project that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 739578 (RISE-Call:H2020-WIDESPREAD-01-2016-2017-TeamingPhase2) and the government of the Republic of Cyprus through the Directorate General for European Programmes, Coordination and Development.


  1. 1.
    Georgiou, Y., Ioannou, A.: Embodied learning in a digital world: a systematic review of empirical research in K-12 education. In: Díaz, P., Ioannou, A., Spector, M., Bhagat, K.-K. (eds.) Learning in a Digital World: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Interactive Technologies for Formal and Informal Education. Smart Computing and Intelligence, pp. 155–177. Springer, Singapore (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ioannou, M., Georgiou, Y., Ioannou, A., Johnson-Glenberg, M.: On the understanding of students’ learning and perceptions of technology integration in low- and high-embodied group learning. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (2019)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karakostas, A., Palaigeorgiou, G., Kompatsiaris, Y.: WeMake: a framework for letting students create tangible, embedded and embodied environments for their own STEAM learning. In: Kompatsiaris, I., et al. (eds.) INSCI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10673, pp. 3–18. Springer, Cham (2017). Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Vocht, M., Laherto, A., Parchmann, I.: Exploring teachers’ concerns about bringing responsible research and innovation to European science classrooms. J. Sci. Teach. Educ. 28, 326–346 (2017). Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kyza, E.A., Georgiou, Y.: Developing in-service science teachers’ ownership of the PROFILES pedagogical framework through a technology-supported participatory design approach to professional development. Sci. Educ. Int. 25, 55–77 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Center on Interactive Media, Smart Systems and Emerging Technologies (RISE)NicosiaCyprus
  2. 2.Cyprus Interaction LabCyprus University of TechnologyLimassolCyprus

Personalised recommendations