Advertisement

Clever Girls pp 337-356 | Cite as

Conclusion

  • Jackie GoodeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter’s conclusions reflect, in the light of contributors’ stories and the conversation they engaged in after sharing them, on the potential of bringing diverse autoethnographic voices together in a collection like this, for illuminating: the lived experiences of intersections of class, gender and ethnicity as experienced by three generations of ‘clever’ girls/women; notions of transition, ‘liminality’ and becoming; and imaginings of what it might mean to be ‘ordinary’ in a society characterised by increasing levels of inequality, polarisation and practices of ‘othering’. Gail Lewis has referred to the creation of spaces ‘where the erstwhile unspeakable may be spoken, and the established norms of intelligibility (whatever their specific shape in specific sites and arena) may no longer provide the traction determining what is deemed legible and comprehensible’. This chapter reviews how far the ‘assemblage’ of the edited collection, made up of a rich and stimulating set of autoethnographic stories set in their broader social, cultural and economic contexts, might act as a ‘jumping off point’ for readers’ own memories, reflections, analyses, theorising and writing—a transformative ‘line of flight’ perhaps, away from ever-widening inequalities and towards new connections.

Keywords

Autoethnographic theorising Creativity Relationality Ordinary selves 

References

  1. Ahmad, F. (2001). Modern Traditions? British Muslim Women and Academic Achievement, Gender and Education, 13, 2, 137–152,  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250120051169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad, F. (2012). Graduating towards marriage? Attitudes towards marriage and relationships among university-educated British Muslim women. Culture and Religion 13, 2,193–210.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2012.674953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic Autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35, 4, 373–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnwell, A. (2019). Family Secrets and the Slow Violence of Social Stigma. Sociology 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519846443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter Andrews, D. J., Brown, T., Castro, E. & Id-Deen, E. (2019). The Impossibility of Being “Perfect and White”: Black Girls’ Racialized and Gendered Schooling Experiences. American Educational Research Journal.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219849392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Etherington, K. (2003). Trauma, the Body and Transformation London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Fox, K. E. (2017). Stand Up and Be (En)Countered, Resistance in solo stand-up performance by Northern English women, marginalised on the basis of gender, class and regional identity. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  8. Galloway, J. (2009). The SRB Interview. Scottish Review of Books, Vol. 5, Issue 2.Google Scholar
  9. Grant, C. (2019). Book of the Week. The Guardian Review, 1 June 2019, p. 16.Google Scholar
  10. Hanley, L. (2016). Respectable, The Experience of Class. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  11. Hey, V. (1997). The Company She Keeps: an Ethnography of Girls’ Friendships. Buckingham: Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Ingold, T. (2010). Bringing Things to Life: Creative Entanglements in a World of Materials. Realities Working Paper 15, presented at ‘Vital Signs: Researching Real Life’, 9 September 2008, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  13. Joseph, E. (2019). Discrimination against credentials in Black bodies: counterstories of the characteristic labour market experiences of migrants in Ireland. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2019.1620916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Langhamer, C. (2018). ‘Who the hell are ordinary people?’ Ordinariness as a category of historical analysis. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 28. pp. 175–195. ISSN 0080-4401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lawler, S. (2017). Studying Britain: A British sociologist’s view. The Sociological Review Monographs, Vol. 65(1) 13–19.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0081176917693551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lewis, G. (2009a). Difficult Dialogues Once Again European Journal of Women’s Studies. 16, 1, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewis, G. (2009b). Birthing Racial Difference: conversations with my mother and others. Studies in the Maternal, 1, 1, pp.1–21. https://www.mamsie.bbk.ac.uk/articles/10.16995/sim.112/
  18. Lewis, G. (2013) Unsafe Travel: Experiencing Intersectionality and Feminist Displacements. Signs, 38, 4, pp. 869–892. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/669609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Loveday, V. (2014). ‘Flat-capping it’: Memory, nostalgia and value in retroactive male working-class identification. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17, 6, 721–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lowen, A. (1967). The Betrayal of the Body. New York: Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Lumsden, K., Goode, J., & Black, A. (2019). ‘I Will Not Be Thrown Out of the Country Because I’m an Immigrant’: Eastern European Migrants’ Responses to Hate Crime in a Semi-Rural Context in the Wake of Brexit. Sociological Research Online, 24(2), 167–184.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418811967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mallman, M. (2017). The perceived inherent vice of working-class university students. The Sociological Review, 65, 2, 235–250.  https://doi.org/10.1111/467-954X.12422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKenzie, L. (2012). Finding value on a council estate: Voices of white working mothers with mixed-race children in St. Anns, Nottingham. In R. Edwards, S. Ali, C. Caballero & M. Song (Eds.), International perspectives on racial and ethnic mixedness and mixing (pp. 92–107). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Meghji, A. (2019). Activating Controlling Images in the Racialized Interaction Order: Black Middle-Class Interactions and the Creativity of Racist Action. Symbolic Interaction, 42, 2, 229–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Orbe, M. (2014). Socioeconomic (Im)mobility. Resisting Classifications Within a “Post-Projects” Identity. In R. M. Boylorn & M. P. Orbe (Eds.), Critical Autoethnography (pp. 195–208). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  26. Phipps, A. (2010). Ethnographers as Language Learners: from Oblivion towards an Echo. In P. Collins & A. Gallinat (Eds.), The ethnographic self as resource: writing memory and experience into ethnography. (pp. 97–110). Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  27. Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516–529). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of Play: Constructing an Academic Life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rollock, N. (2012). The invisibility of race: Intersectional reflections on the liminal space of alterity. Race Ethnicity and Education 15, 1, 65–84.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.638864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roseneil, S. & Ketokivi, K. (2016). Relational Persons and Relational Processes: Developing the notion of relationality for the sociology of personal life. Sociology, 50, 1, 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Steedman C. (1986). Landscape for a Good Woman: A Story of Two Women. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Taylor, Y. (2012). Close encounters of the classed kind. Again… Social & Cultural Geography, 1, 3, 6, 545–549.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2012.696680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Treacher, A. (2000). Welcome home: between two cultures and two colours, in A. Brah and A. E. Coombes (Eds.), Hybridity and its Discontents. Politics, Science, Culture (pp. 96–107), London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Tyler, I., & Slater, T. (2018). Rethinking the sociology of stigma. The Sociological Review, 66, 4, 721–743.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118777425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van der Kolk, B. (2015). The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind and Body in the Healing of Trauma. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  36. Xiang B. (2016). Theory as vision. Anthropological Theory, 16, 2–3, 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Loughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations