Advertisement

The MIRACLE

  • Georg RauterEmail author
Chapter
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Bones in general and human bones in particular are being cut with mechanical tools since thousands of years. Only in the last decades, another technology has evolved that starts challenging the way bone is being cut: lasers. Despite the huge technological effort that is required to guide lasers and make them cut bone without leading to carbonization, laserosteotomes feature several properties that might become a game changer in the medical field and how bones will be cut in the future.

In Basel, Switzerland, the first robot-assisted laserosteotome has been developed that cuts bone in an open surgical process. Due to the promising results with this first device throughout several studies, the MIRACLE project (short for Minimal-Invasive Robot-Assisted Computer-guided LaserosteotomE) has been initiated. MIRACLE is currently on its way of bringing robot-assisted laserosteotomy to the next level.

Keywords

Future of laser osteotomy MIRACLE Miniature robot Smart laser osteotome Parallel robot CARLO Optical coherence tomograph Medical robotics 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The MIRACLE project is financially supported by the Werner Siemens Foundation, Zug, Switzerland.

References

  1. 1.
    Piek J, Lidke G, Terberger T, von Smekal U, Gaab MR. Stone age skull surgery in mecklenburg-vorpommern: a systematic study. Neurosurgery. 1999;45(1):147–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baek K-w, Deibel W, Marinov D, Griessen M, Dard M, Bruno A, Zeilhofer H-F, Cattin P, Juergens P. A comparative investigation of bone surface after cutting with mechanical tools and er: Yag laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2015;47(5):426–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nguendon Kenhagho HK, Rauter G, Guzman R, Cattin PC, Zam A. Comparison of acoustic shock waves generated by micro and nanosecond lasers for a smart laser surgery system. In: Advanced biomedical and clinical diagnostic and surgical guidance systems XVI, vol. 10484. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2018. p. 104840P.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stübinger S, Nuss K, Pongratz M, Price J, Sader R, Zeilhofer H-F, von Rechenberg B. Comparison of er: Yag laser and piezoelectric osteotomy: an animal study in sheep. Lasers Surg Med. 2010;42(8):743–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Augello M, Deibel W, Nuss K, Cattin P, Jürgens P. Comparative microstructural analysis of bone osteotomies after cutting by computer-assisted robot-guided laser osteotome and piezoelectric osteotome: an in vivo animal study. Lasers Med Sci. 2018;33(7):1471–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deibel W, Schneider A, Augello M, Bruno AE, Juergens P, Cattin P. A compact, efficient, and lightweight laser head for carlo: integration, performance, and benefits. In: Novel optical systems design and optimization XVIII, vol. 9579. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2015. p. 957905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Augello M, Baetscher C, Segesser M, Zeilhofer H-F, Cattin P, Juergens P. Performing partial mandibular resection, fibula free flap reconstruction and midfacial osteotomies with a cold ablation and robot-guided er: Yag laser osteotome (carlo)—a study on applicability and effectiveness in human cadavers. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 2018;46(10):1850–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bruno AE, Zeilhofer H-F, Jürgens P. Carlo-computer assisted and robot guided laser-osteotome, 30 Aug 30. US Patent App. 13/497,520.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Christoph H. Wenn der arzt mit dem ingenieur. Technical report, Basler Zeitung, Wirtschaft, July 2018.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bayhaqi YA, Navarini A, Rauter G, Cattin PC, Zam A. Neural network in tissue characterization of optical coherence tomography (oct) image for smart laser surgery: preliminary study. In: Third international seminar on photonics, optics, and its applications (ISPhOA 2018), vol. 11044. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2019. p. 1104402.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abbasi H, Rauter G, Guzman R, Cattin PC, Zam A. Differentiation of femur bone from surrounding soft tissue using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy as a feedback system for smart laserosteotomy. In: Biophotonics: photonic solutions for better health care VI, vol. 10685. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2018. p. 1068519.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nguendon Kenhagho H, Shevchik S, Saeidi F, Faivre N, Meylan B, Rauter G, Guzman R, Cattin P, Wasmer K, Zam A. Characterization of ablated bone and muscle for long-pulsed laser ablation in dry and wet conditions. Materials. 2019;12(8):1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eugster M, Cattin PC, Zam A, Rauter G. A parallel robotic mechanism for the stabilization and guidance of an endoscope tip in laser osteotomy. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; 2018. p. 1306–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eugster M, Weber P, Cattin P, Zam A, Kosa G, Rauter G. Positioning and stabilization of a minimally invasive laser osteotome. In: Proceedings of the Hamlyn symposium on medical robotics. London: Imperial College London and the Royal Geographical Society; 2017. p. 21–2.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eugster M, Weber P, Rauter G. Medical endodevice. European Patent Application, EP 17177760.0, 26. June 2017Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bio-Inspired RObots for MEDicine-Lab (BIROMED-Lab), Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations