Advertisement

Evaluating the Role of Critical Media Education in Mediating Counter-Conduct

  • Kiran Vinod Bhatia
  • Manisha Pathak-Shelat
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we present a two-pronged approach we developed to evaluate the effectiveness of the media education exercises designed for and with the students. In the first phase, we analyze if there is a change in the way students negotiate and engage with media texts in and through the narratives they produced. This is done by describing situations of media teaching and media learning and is based on the observational notes of the media educator. The second phase, therefore, is characterized by new relationships and associations emerging during the course of the media education program, i.e., if there is a change in the way students relate to each other, do they use new, productive terms to refer to one another, and do they recognize the “other’s” voice during group interactions. To corroborate a change in the attitude and relational affinity between students, we used testimonies submitted by teachers’ and parents, self-reports of students, and our personal observational notes.

Keywords

Evaluation techniques Attitude change Relational affinity Role of media educator 

References

  1. Blythe, T. (2002). Working hard for the money: A faith-based media literacy analysis of the top television dramas of 2000–2001. Journal of Media & Religion, 1(3), 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brookfield, S. (1994). Tales from the dark side: A phenomenography of adult critical reflection. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 13(3), 203–218.Google Scholar
  3. Buckingham, D. (2005). The media literacy of children and young people: A review of literature on behalf of OFCOM (Project Report). London, UK: OFCOM.Google Scholar
  4. Cheng, K. (2009). The times they are a changing: Media education. In C. Cheung (Ed.), Media education in Asia (pp. 13–18). Dordrecht: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9529-0_5.
  5. Erstad, O., & Gilje, Ø. (2008). Regaining impact: Media education and media literacy in a Norwegian context. NORDICOM Review, 29(2), 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferreday, D., Hodgson V., & Jones, C. (2006). Dialogue, language and identity: Critical issues for networked management learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(3), 223–239.Google Scholar
  7. Fisherkeller, J. E. (1999). Learning about power and success: Young urban adolescents interpret TV culture. Communication Review, 3(3), 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geiger, W. (2001). Talk about TV: Television viewers’ interpersonal communication about programming. Communication Reports, 14(1), 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldstein, R. (2007). The perilous pitfalls of praxis: Critical pedagogy as “regime of truth”. In R. Goldstein (Ed.), Useful theory: Making critical education practical (pp. 15–29). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  10. Hart, A. (2001). Awkward practice: Teaching media in English. Changing English, 8(1), 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hobbs, R. (1998). The seven great debates in the media literacy movement. Journal of Communication, 48(1), 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hobbs, R. (2004). A review of school-based initiatives in media literacy education. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(1), 42–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kubey, R. (2003). Why U.S. media education lags behind the rest of the English speaking world. Television New Media, 4(4), 351–370.Google Scholar
  14. Martens, H. (2010). Evaluating media literacy education: Concepts, theories, and future directions. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 2, 1–22.Google Scholar
  15. Potter, W. J. (2004). Argument for the need for a cognitive theory of media literacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(2), 266–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reynolds, M. (1999). Grasping the nettle: Possibilities and pitfalls of a critical management pedagogy. British Journal of Management, 10(2), 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Scharrer, E. (2002). Making a case for media literacy in the curriculum: Outcomes and assessment. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(4), 354–358.Google Scholar
  18. Scharrer, E. (2006). Sixth graders take on television: Media literacy and critical attitudes of television violence. Communication Research Reports, 22(1), 325–333.Google Scholar
  19. Scheibe, C. L. (2004). A deeper sense of literacy: Curriculum-driven approaches to media literacy in the K-12 classroom. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(1), 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stout, D. A. (2002). Religious media literacy: Toward a research agenda. Journal of Media & Religion, 1(1), 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sun, F., & Scharrer, E. (2004). Staying true to Disney: College students’ resistance to criticism of The Little Mermaid. Communication Review, 7(1), 35–55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kiran Vinod Bhatia
    • 1
  • Manisha Pathak-Shelat
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Journalism and Mass CommunicationUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUnited States
  2. 2.MICAAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations