Military Dimensions

  • Michel RichardEmail author


The military dimensions associated with nuclear arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation verification of a state’s commitments are key for any significant and solid progress to be made. Verification of compliance and assurances of the absence of cheating are very sensitive issues, in particular with respect to the military capabilities that form the foundation of strategic and political posture at a national, regional and global level. This article sets the scene through a brief historical review of the influence that verification has on the credibility of arms control measures, the effectiveness of nuclear non-proliferation efforts and the importance of the nuclear disarmament process. In the framework of nuclear disarmament verification the main features of the military nuclear system are the doctrines, research & development, production, deployment and elimination of nuclear weapons, and the verification measures associated with disarmament commitments. Finally, a brief description of the complexity of regional, multinational and international instruments is provided. Using a systems concept to establish a verification mechanism, taking into account the specificity and the issues impacting individual states, could overcome the global complexity and national antagonisms and provide the confidence needed to enhance world global security.


  1. 1.
    Finaud M (2013) Cooperative Security: A new paradigm for a world without nuclear weapons? CADMUS 2 (1):169–179Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arms Control Association (2019) 2019 Estimated Global Nuclear Wearhead Inventories. Sources: Arms Control Association, Federation of American Scientists, International Panel on Fissile Materials, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of State and Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (updated June 2019).
  3. 3.
    Norris RS, Kristensen HM (2010) Global nuclear weapons inventories 1945–2010. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 66(4):77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    UN Security Council Resolution 1887: Non-proliferation, 24 September 2009Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Delpech T (2012) Nuclear Deterrence in the 21st century, Lessons from the Cold War for a New Era of Strategic Piracy. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Accessed 30 April 2019Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sellal P (2010) Remarks at the Global Zero Conference, Paris, February 2nd 2010Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kristensen HM, Norris RS (2015) Indian nuclear forces, 2015. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 71(5):77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kristensen HM, Norris RS (2016) Pakistani nuclear forces, 2016. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 72(6):368–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kristensen HM, Norris RS (2015) Chinese nuclear forces 2015. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists 71(4):77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS): Nuclear Weapons Programs Worldwide: An Historical Overview. Accessed 30 April 2019
  11. 11.
    Eisenhower DD (1953) Atoms for Peace. Speech of the President of the United States of America to the 470th Plenary Meeting of the United Nations General Assembly, 8 December 1953Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2016) History. Accessed 30 April 2019
  13. 13.
    European Union (2012) Consolidated version of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community. Accessed 30 April 2019
  14. 14.
    Commission on Presidential Debates (2015) The Third Kennedy-Nixon Presidential Debate. October 13, 1960 Debate Transcript. Accessed 30 April 2019
  15. 15.
    U.S.-Russian Nuclear Arms Control Agreements at a Glance. Fact Sheets & Briefs. In: Arms Control Association. Accessed 30 April 2019
  16. 16.
    Draft Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty, 9 April 2015. Accessed 30 April 2019
  17. 17.
    King’s College London, James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies (2015) NPT Briefing Book (2015 Edition). Accessed 30 April 2019
  18. 18.
    List of states with nuclear weapons. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Accessed 30 April 2019
  19. 19.
    Negative security assurances. In: Reaching Critical Will. Accessed 30 April 2019
  20. 20.
    International Panel on Fissile Materials (IPFM) Home page. Accessed 30 April 2019
  21. 21.
    Dynkin AA (2010) Foreword at the Conference “Contemporary Nuclear Doctrines”, Moscow. Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences and Nuclear Threat Initiative.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blumenthal D, Mazza M (2011) China’s Strategic Forces in the 21st Century: The PLA’s Changing Nuclear Doctrine and Force Posture. Accessed 30 April 2019
  23. 23.
    International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2013) IAEA Department of Safeguards Long-Term R&D Plan, 2012–2023. IAEA, STR-375Google Scholar
  24. 24.

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division Global Security and International RegulationsFondation pour la Recherche Stratégique (FRS)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations