Advertisement

Information Management: The Role of Information Technology in Treaty Verification

  • Nicholas KyriakopoulosEmail author
Chapter
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

Arms control treaties rely on extensive collection, processing and analysis of data to ascertain compliance with treaty obligations. Monitoring and evaluation relies on a broad range of technologies for sensing, communications and processing to collect, transmit and analyze the data necessary to detect non-compliance. The effectiveness of a treaty verification system depends on the ability of the information management system to collect and evaluate the information necessary to ascertain compliance with the treaty obligations. The information management systems for treaty verification have the same architecture because they are similar in concept and operation. They collect, transmit, store, process and analyze data. The effectiveness of each of these operations is a function of the capabilities of the associated technology. This chapter presents an overview of the technologies available for use in each of the elements of a treaty information management system. In sensing, these range from low frequency seismic sensors to multispectral and hyperspectral imaging. Data can be transmitted in the order of hundreds of Gigabits per second through fiber optic cables for terrestrial communications and tens of Megabits per second for satellite channels, while available technologies allow for storing petabytes of data and processing speeds of tens of Gigabytes per second. These capabilities are more than sufficient to collect the necessary data for use in sophisticated analysis algorithms for detecting treaty violations.

References

  1. 1.
    Shannon C E (1948) A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 227(July, October): 379–423, 623–656Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meadow CT Yuan W (1997) Measuring the Impact of Information: Defining the Concepts. Information Processing & Management 33(6):697–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Järvelin K, Wilson TD (2003) On conceptual models for information seeking and retrieval research. Information Research 9(1)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cooley JN (2006) International Atomic Agency Safeguards under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons: Challenges in Implementation. In: Avenhaus R et al (eds) Verifying Treaty Compliance: Limiting Weapons of Mass Destruction and Monitoring Kyoto Protocol Provisions, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction. http://www.opcw.org/chemical-weapons-convention/. Accessed 29 Feb 2019
  6. 6.
    Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-BanTreaty. http://www.ctbto.org/fileadmin/content/treaty/treaty_text.pdf. Accessed 29 Feb 2019
  7. 7.
    IRIS PASSCAL Sensors. https://www.passcal.nmt.edu/content/instrumentation/sensors. Accessed 29 Feb 2019
  8. 8.
    Tsoulfanidis S, Landsberger S (2011) Measurement and Detection of Radiation, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hastings A, Smith Jr HA, Lucas M (1991) Gamma-Ray Detectors. In: Reilly D, Eneslin N, Smith Jr. HA, Kreiner S (eds) Passive Nondestructive Assay of Nuclear Materials, U. S. Government Printing Office, Report NUREG/CR-5550Google Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Shaw GA, Burke HK (2003) Spectral Imaging for Remote Sensing. Lincoln Laboratory Journal 14(1):3–28Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farley V, Vallières A, et al (2006) Performance of the FIRST: a long-wave infrared hyperspectral imaging sensor. Proc. SPIE 6398, Optically Based Biological and Chemical Detection for Defence III, 63980T. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.689487
  13. 13.
    Satellite Footprints. http://www.sadoun.com/Sat/Installation/Dish-Size.htm. Accessed 29 Feb 2019
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Seagate HAMR hard drive technology. https://newatlas.com/seagate-hamr-hard-drive-technology/21880/. Accessed 29 Feb 2019
  16. 16.
    Hitachi TagmaStore® Universal Storage Platform and Network Storage Controller. http://www.spectra.com/wp-content/uploads/tagmastore_usp.pdf. Accessed 29 Feb 2019
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Dean J, Ghemawat S (2008) MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters. Communications of the ACM 51(1):107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee KH, et al (2011) Parallel Data Processing with MapReduce: A Survey. SIGMOD Record 40(4):11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Silberschatz A, Korth HF, Sudarshan S, (2010) Database System Concepts, 6th edn. http://codex.cs.yale.edu/avi/db-book/db6/slide-dir/. Accessed 29 Feb 2019
  21. 21.
    Agrawal R, et al, (2009) The Claremont Report on Database Research. Communications of the ACM 52(6):56–65. http://db.cs.berkeley.edu/claremont/claremontreport08.pdf. Accessed 29 Feb 2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    National Research Council (2012) The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12849/the-comprehensive-nuclear-test-ban-treaty-technical-issues-for-the. Accessed 29 Feb 2019Google Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The George Washington UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations