Change-Driven Testing

  • Sven Amann
  • Elmar Jürgens
Open Access


Today, testers have to test ever larger amounts of software in ever smaller periods of time. This makes it infeasible to simply execute entire test suites for every change. Also it has become impractical—if it ever was—to manually ensure that the tests cover all changes. In response to this challenge, we propose Change-Driven Testing. Change-Driven Testing uses Test-Impact Analysis to automatically find the relevant tests for any given code change and sort them in a way that increases the chance of catching mistakes early on. This makes testing more efficient, catching over 90% of mistakes in only 2% testing time. Furthermore, Change-Driven Testing uses Test-Gap Analysis to automatically identify test gaps, i.e., code changes that lack tests. This enables us to make conscious decisions about where to direct our limited testing resource to improve our testing effectiveness and notifies us about where we are missing regression tests.


Software testing Test automation Test intelligence Regression-test selection Test prioritization Test-resource management Risk management 


  1. 1.
    Eder, S., Hauptmann, B., Junker, M., Juergens, E., Vaas, R., Prommer, K.H.: Did we test our changes? Assessing alignment between tests and development in practice. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Automation of Software Test (AST’13) (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Juergens, E., Pagano, D.: Did We Test the Right Thing? Experiences with Test Gap Analysis in Practice. Whitepaper, CQSE GmbH (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Juergens, E., Pagano, D., Goeb, A.: Test Impact Analysis: Detecting Errors Early Despite Large, Long-Running Test Suites. Whitepaper, CQSE GmbH (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rott, J.: Empirische Untersuchung der Effektivität von Testpriorisierungsverfahren in der Praxis. Master’s thesis, Technische Universität München (2019)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rott, J., Niedermayr, R., Juergens, E., Pagano, D.: Ticket coverage: putting test coverage into context. In: Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Metrics (WETSoM’17) (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sven Amann
    • 1
  • Elmar Jürgens
    • 1
  1. 1.CQSE GmbHMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations