Advertisement

Welfare Gains from a Capital Market Union with Capital-Funded Pensions

  • Thomas Davoine
  • Susanne ForstnerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Financial and Monetary Policy Studies book series (FMPS, volume 48)

Abstract

We analyze and compare the long-run effects for a country introducing a capital-funded pension pillar in two scenarios: The case of separate capital markets, on the one hand, and the case of integrated capital markets (a capital market union), on the other hand. Our analysis is based on simulations with a large-scale overlapping-generations model. We find that, in the long run, the introduction of capital-funded pensions is more attractive in integrated capital markets than in separated capital markets, if other countries in the integrated capital market have pay-as-you-go pension systems.

References

  1. Attanasio O, Kitao S, Violante GL (2007) Global demographic trends and social security reform. J Monet Econ 54(1):144–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auerbach AJ, Kotlikoff LJ (1987) Dynamic fiscal policy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger J, Keuschnigg C, Keuschnigg M, Miess M, Strohner L, Winter-Ebmer R (2009) Modelling of labour markets in the European Union. Final Report for DG EMPL of the European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  4. Boone J, Bovenberg L (2002) Optimal labour taxation and search. J Public Econ 85:53–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Börsch-Supan A, Ludwig A, Winter J (2006) Ageing, pension reform and capital flows: a multi-country simulation model. Economica 73(292):625–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diamond P (2004) Social Security. Am Econ Rev 94:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. European Commission (2017) Reflection paper on the deepening of the economic and monetary union. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  8. Eurostat (2015) Population projections, Europop 2013. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  9. Fehr H, Habermann C (2010) Private retirement savings and mandatory annuitization. Int Tax Public Financ 17(6):640–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldstein M (2005) Rethinking social insurance. Am Econ Rev 95:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gertler M (1999) Government debt and social security in a life-cycle economy. Carn-Roch Conf Ser Public Policy 50:61–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jaag C (2009) Education, demographics, and the economy. J Pension Econ Finance 8:189–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jaag C, Keuschnigg C, Keuschnigg M (2010) Pension reform, retirement, and life-cycle unemployment. Int Tax Public Financ 17:556–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keuschnigg C, Davoine T, Schuster P (2015) Aging, pension reform and the current account. Research report for the Jubiläumsfonds of the ÖNB. Institute for Advanced Studies, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  15. Krusell P, Mukoyama T, Şahin A, Smith AA (2009) Revisiting the welfare effects of eliminating business cycles. Rev Econ Dyn 12(3):393–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lassila J, Valkonen T (2001) Pension prefunding, ageing, and demographic uncertainty. Int Tax Public Financ 8(4):573–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindbeck A, Persson M (2003) The gains from pension reform. J Econ Lit 41:74–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morelli D (2010) European capital market integration: an empirical study based on a European asset pricing model. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 20:363–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. OECD (2018) OECD pensions outlook 2018. OECD Publishing, Paris.  https://doi.org/10.1787/pens_outlook-2018-en

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS)ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations