Advertisement

Soft Rocks in Underground Hydroelectric Schemes

  • Luís Ribeiro e Sousa
  • Hui Zhou
  • Rita Leal e Sousa
  • Chuanqing Zhang
Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to analyze the behavior of underground works associated to hydroelectric schemes when soft rocks formations are present. The work starts with a brief introduction to the different types of underground hydroelectric schemes with a reference to the specific works related to the hydraulic circuit, to the powerhouse complex and to surge chambers. Considerations about risk analysis and risk management are presented taking into consideration soft rock masses. Examples of application of underground hydroelectric schemes are illustrated. The first case is related to the Socorridos hydroelectric scheme in Madeira Island, Portugal, in volcanic formations. Emphasis is made to the existence of weak formations and to the development of a new empirical system for volcanic rock formations. The Mingtan underground pumped station in Taiwan presented complex geological formations. Reference is made for the LFJ in situ tests performed for deformability evaluation. Another case is related to a wedge failure occurred at Cahora Bassa, Mozambique due to the existence of a low strength surface. The last case is related to the mega-project Jinping II, in China. Deep tunnels intersected by chlorite schists are studied in detail. A conclusion is drawn.

Keywords

Soft rocks Underground hydroelectric schemes Caverns Powerhouses Hydraulic circuits Surge chambers Risk analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

A special acknowledgement is made to Chunsheng Zhang, Xiangrong Chen, Jing Hou, and Yang Zhang for the contribution to the collection of the field information about the deep headrace tunnels at the Jinping II hydropower station.

A special acknowledgement is made to Paulo Cafofo for his contribution to the study of Socorridos hydroelectric scheme.

References

  1. ASCE (1996) Rock foundations (Technical Engineering and Design Guides as adapted from US Army Corps of Engineers, no. 16). American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, p 129Google Scholar
  2. Barton N (2000) TBM tunneling in jointed and faulted rock. Balkema, Rotterdam, p 172Google Scholar
  3. Bieniawski Z (1989) Engineering rock mass classification. US Corps of Engineering, Technical Report GL-799-19. WES, VicksburgGoogle Scholar
  4. Cafofo P (2006) Underground works of the Socorridos scheme. Report for Geotechnical Design discipline. University of Minho, Guimaraes, p 131. (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  5. Cafofo P, Sousa LR (2007) Innovative underground works at Socorridos, Madeira Island, Portugal. Workshop on Volcanic Rocks. Taylor and Francis Group, Ponta Delgada, pp 73–80Google Scholar
  6. Cafofo P, Sousa LR, Moura F (2007) In: Kaliampakos D, Bernardos A (eds) Innovative underground works at Madeira Island, Portugal. 11th ACUUS Conference on Underground Space: Expanding the Frontiers. NTUA Press, Athens, pp 137–143Google Scholar
  7. Einstein H (2002) Risk assessment and management in geotechnical engineering. 8th Portuguese Geotechnical Congress, Lisbon, pp 2237–2262Google Scholar
  8. Eskesen S, Tengborg P, Kampmann J, Veicherts T (2004) Guidelines for tunnelling risk management. International Tunnelling Association, Working Group No. 2. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 19:217–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feng XT, Jiang Q, Sousa LR, Miranda T (2012) Underground hydroelectric power-schemes. In: Sousa LM, Vargas EA, Fernandes MM, Azevedo RF (eds) Innovative numerical modeling in geomechanics. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 13–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geoguide 4 (1992) Guide to cavern engineering. Geotechnical Engineering Office, Hong Kong, p 147Google Scholar
  11. HCB (2018) Hydroelectric of Cahora Bassa. www.hcb.co.mz
  12. He M (2014) Latest progress of soft rock mechanics and engineering in China. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6:165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. He M, Sousa LR, Sousa RL, Gomes A, Vargas E, Zhang N (2011) Risk assessment of CO2 injection processes and storage in carboniferous formations: a review. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 3(1):39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoek E (2007a) Practical rock engineering. www.rocscience.com
  15. Hoek E (2007b) Big trends in bad rock. Therzaghi lecture. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(9):726–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kanji MA (2014) Critical issues in soft rocks. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6:186–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lamas LN (1993) Contributions to understanding the hydromechanical behavior of pressure tunnels. PhD Thesis. Imperial College, London, p 419Google Scholar
  18. Lemos JV (2010) Modeling rock masses in large underground works. In: Cruz, Cunha, Maia, Pinto (eds) Conference on Hydroelectric Schemes in Portugal. A New Cycle. University of Porto, Porto, pp 143–155. (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  19. Menezes AT, Varela FM, Sousa LR, Moura F (2007) Geomechanical studies for a road tunnel in volcanic formations. ITA Congress, PragueGoogle Scholar
  20. Miranda T, Sousa LR, Gomes AT, Tinoco J, Ferreira C (2018) Volcanic rocks geomechanical characterization by using empiric systems. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 10(2018):138–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moura F, Sousa LR (2007) Road tunnels at Madeira Island, Portugal. In: Malheiro AM, Nunes JC (eds) Workshop on volcanic rocks. Taylor and Francis Group, Ponta Delgada, pp 201–206Google Scholar
  22. Nuss L, Hansen K, Marsumoto N (2017) Earthquake performance of concrete dams. Seismic Analysis of Concrete Dams Workshop, USSD Conference, New Orleans, PPT presentationGoogle Scholar
  23. Popielak R, Weining W (2010) Engineering and design services for excavation – DUSEL. Preliminary Design, Preliminary Report #2, Contract D10-04, Lakewood, Colorado, p 104Google Scholar
  24. Rocha M (1975) Some problems regarding rock mechanics of low strength materials. V Pan-American Congress on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Buenos Aires, pp 489–514. (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  25. Rocha M (1976) Underground structures. LNEC, Lisbon. (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  26. Rocha M (1978) Analysis and design of the foundation of concrete dams. ISRM Symp. on Rock Mechanics Applied to Dam Foundations, Rio de Janeiro, vol 3, pp 3.11–3.70Google Scholar
  27. Rodrigues FP, Grossman NF, Rodrigues LF (1978) Rock mechanics tests of the Mingtan pumped storage project. LNEC report. LNEC, Lisbon. 2 VolGoogle Scholar
  28. Schleiss A (2000) Hydraulic schemes. EFPL, Lausanne, p 482. (in French)Google Scholar
  29. Serafim L, Pereira P (1983) Considerations on the geomechanical classification of Bieniawski. Int. Symp. Engineering Geology and Underground Construction, Lisbon, vol 1, pp 33–42Google Scholar
  30. Silveira A, Azevedo M, Costa P (1974) Contribution to the study of the underground powerhouse of Cahora Bassa. LNEC, Memory no. 430. LNEC, Lisbon. (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  31. Sousa LR (1976) Modern methods for design of tunnels – mathematical models. J Geotecnia (16):51–81. (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  32. Sousa LR (1983) Three-dimensional analysis of large underground power stations. ISRM Congress, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  33. Sousa LR (2006) Learning with accidents and damage associated to underground works. In: Matos AC, Sousa LR, Kleberger J, Pinto PL (eds) Geotechnical risks in rock tunnels. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 7–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sousa RL (2010) Risk analysis for tunneling projects. MIT, PhD Thesis, Cambridge, p 589Google Scholar
  35. Sousa LR, Lamas LN, Martins CS (1994) Applications of computational mechanics to underground structures in hydraulic projects. In: Vargas E, Azevedo R, Sousa LR, Fernandes MM (eds) 1st Int. Workshop on Applications of Computational Mechanics in Geotechnical Engineering. Balkema, Rio de Janeiro, pp 15–88Google Scholar
  36. Sousa LR, Ramos JM, Silva HS (1995) Cahora-Bassa hydroelectric scheme. A new monitoring plan. 8th ISRM Congress, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  37. Sousa LR, Chapman D, Miranda T (2010) Deep rock foundations of skyscrapers. J Soil Rock 33(1):3–22Google Scholar
  38. Sousa LR, Sousa RL, Zhou C, Karam K (2018) Methodology for evaluating geomechanical properties of soft rock masses by laboratory and in situ tests. In: Soft rock masses. Springer, New York, p 33Google Scholar
  39. Wu SY, Feng X, Sousa LR (2010) Jinping II mega hydropower project, China. Int. Conf. on Hydroelectric Schemes in Portugal. A new cycle, Porto, pp 223–231Google Scholar
  40. Wyllie D (1999) Foundations on rock. E & FN Spon, London, p 401Google Scholar
  41. Yang F, Zhang C, Zhou H, Liu N, Zhang Y, Azhar MU, Dai F (2017) The long-term safety of a deeply buried soft rock tunnel lining under inside-to-outside seepage conditions. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 67:132–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang CQ, Zhou H, Feng XT (2011) An index for estimating the stability of brittle surrounding rock mass—FAI and its engineering application. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44:401–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luís Ribeiro e Sousa
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hui Zhou
    • 3
  • Rita Leal e Sousa
    • 4
  • Chuanqing Zhang
    • 3
  1. 1.Tongji UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.SKL-GDUE of China University of Mining and TechnologyBeijingChina
  3. 3.SKL-GGE, Institute of Rock and Soil MechanicsChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanChina
  4. 4.Masdar Institute of Science and TechnologyAbu DhabiUAE

Personalised recommendations