Advertisement

Sport Innovation: An Opportunity for Technology-Based Companies Stimulated by the Brazil Olympics

  • Branca Terra
  • André Ribeiro de Oliveira
  • Mariza Almeida
  • Luiz Alberto Batista
  • João Alberto Neves dos Santos
  • Jana Almeida Nogueira
  • Leonardo Lehneman Agostinho Martins
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to evaluate the innovation degree and environment of Brazilian technology-based companies that produce sports devices with the support of business incubators and government encouragement. The results show the low level of innovation in these companies, even though one can observe a positive set of government initiatives.

Keywords

Innovation degree Innovation environment Innovation Sports innovation University–industry–government interaction Triple helix 

References

  1. Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40–47.Google Scholar
  2. Associação Nacional De Entidades Promotoras De Empreendimentos Inovadores (Anprotec). membership. Accessed April 5, 2014, from http://anprotec.org.br/site/menu/a-anprotec/associados-anprotec/
  3. Bachmann, D. L., & Destefani, J. H. (2008). Metodologia para Estimar o Grau de Inovação nas MPE. Curitiba. Accessed March 1, 2016, from http://www.bachmann.com.br/website/documents/ArtigoGraudeInovacaonasMPE.pdf
  4. Botelho, A. J. J., & Almeida, M. (2011). Overcoming institutional shortcomings for academic spin-off policies in Brazil. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 9(3), 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brasil. Decreto n. 5.563, de 11 de outubro de 2005. Regulamenta a Lei no 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de 2004, que dispõe sobre incentivos à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 13 out. 2005. Accessed December 10, 2013, from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2005/decreto/d5563.htm
  6. Brasil. Decreto 9.283, de 07.02.2018. Regulamenta a Lei n° 10.973, de 02.12.2004, a Lei n° 13.243, de 11.01.2016, o art. 24, § 3°, e o art. 32, § 7°, da Lei n° 8.666, de 21.06.1993, o art. 1° da Lei n° 8.010, de 29.03.1990, e o art. 2°, caput, inciso I, alínea “g”, da Lei n° 8.032, de 12.04.1990, e altera o Decreto n° 6.759, de 05.02.2009, para estabelecer medidas de incentivo à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo, com vistas à capacitação tecnológica, ao alcance da autonomia tecnológica e ao desenvolvimento do sistema produtivo nacional e regional. Accessed May 1, 2019, from https://www.mctic.gov.br/mctic/opencms/legislacao/decretos/Decreto_n_9283_de_07022018.html
  7. Brasil. Lei n. 10.973, de 02 de dezembro de 2004. Dispõe sobre incentivos à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 03 dez. 2004. Accessed December 10, 2013, from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2004/lei/l10.973.htm
  8. Brasil. Lei N° 13.243, DE 11 DE JANEIRO DE 2016. Dispõe sobre estímulos ao desenvolvimento científico, à pesquisa, à capacitação científica e tecnológica e à inovação e altera a Lei n° 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de 2004, a Lei n° 6.815, de 19 de agosto de 1980, a Lei n° 8.666, de 21 de junho de 1993, a Lei n° 12.462, de 4 de agosto de 2011, a Lei n° 8.745, de 9 de dezembro de 1993, a Lei n° 8.958, de 20 de dezembro de 1994, a Lei n° 8.010, de 29 de março de 1990, a Lei n° 8.032, de 12 de abril de 1990, e a Lei n° 12.772, de 28 de dezembro de 2012, nos termos da Emenda Constitucional n° 85, de 26 de fevereiro de 2015. Accessed May 1, 2019, from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2016/lei/l13243.htm
  9. Cooper, R. (1990, November/December). New products: What distinguishes the winners. Research Technology Management, 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, R. (1993). Winning at new products (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  11. Enríquez, G., & Costa, J. G. C. (2001). Sistemas locais de inovação tecnológica, incubadoras de empresas e desenvolvimento da indústria do Pará. Revista Saber: Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia, 3, 103–120.Google Scholar
  12. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hansen, E., & Allen, K. (1992). The creation corridor: Environmental load and pre-organization information-processing ability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(1), 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hillairet, D., Richard, G., & Bouchet, P. (2009). The dual management of innovation by the Decathlon group. A distinctive strategic system in the sporting goods market. Journal of Innovation Economics Management, 1, 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoeber, L., & Hoeber, O. (2012). Determinants of an innovation process: A case study of technological innovation in a community sports organization. Journal of Sport Management, 26(3), 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Instituto Brasileiro De Geografia E Estatística (IBGE). (2016). Pesquisa de inovação: 2014/IBGE, Coordenação de Indústria. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. Accessed April 14, 2016, from http://www.pintec.ibge.gov.br/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=45&Itemid=12
  17. Newell, S., & Swan, J. (1995). The diffusion of innovations in sports organizations: An evaluative framework. Journal of Sport Management, 9(3), 317–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. OECD. (2010). SMEs, entrepreneurship and innovation. Accessed April 20, 2019, from http://www.oecd.org/berlin/45493007.pdf
  19. Pitts, B., Fielding, L., & Miller, L. (1994). Industry segmentation theory and the sports industry: Developing a sports industry segment model. Sport Marketing Quarterly [SMQ], 3(1), 15–24. Accessed September 4, 2014, from http://www.academia.edu/3668977/1994_Brenda_Pitts_Industry_Segmentation_Theory_and_the_Sport_Industry_Developing_a_Sport_Industry_Segment_Model_-_Sport_Marketing_Quarterly_1994
  20. Preece, S. B., Miles, G., & Baetz, M. C. (1999). Explaining the international intensity and global diversity of early-stage technology-based firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 14(3), 259–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rappert, B., Webster, A., & Charles, D. (1999). Making sense of diversity and reluctance: Academic–industrial relations and intellectual property. Research policy, 28(8), 873–890.Google Scholar
  22. Ratten, V. (2010). Developing a theory of sport-based entrepreneurship. Journal of Management & Organization, 16(4), 557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ratten, V. (2011). A social perspective of sports-based entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 12(3), 314–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ratten, V., & Ratten, H. (2011). International sport marketing: Practical and future research. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 26, 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sawhney, M., Wolcott, R. C., & Arroniz, I. (2006). The 12 different ways for companies to innovate. MIT Sloan Management Review, 75–81. Accessed January 15, 2016, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stuart_Hart4/publication/237379284_Innovation_From_the_Inside_Out/links/0a85e5320a7feba016000000.pdf#page=30
  27. Shane, A. S. (2004). Finding fertile ground. Economics Department at the Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University: Bookman.Google Scholar
  28. Silva Neto, A. T. (2012). Mensuração do grau de inovação em micro e pequenas empresas do estado de Sergipe. Dissertation (professional master’s degree in regional development and the management of local endeavours), Núcleo de Pós-graduação e Pesquisa em economia, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristovão. Accessed January 15, 2016, from https://bdtd.ufs.br/bitstream/tede/1531/1/ANA%20TERESA%20SILVA%20NETO.pdf
  29. Steffensen, M., Rogers, E. M., & Speakman, K. (2000). Spin-offs from research centers at a research university. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(1), 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Terra, B., Batista, L. A., Campos, S. R. C., & Almeida, M. (2013). Interaction among universities, government and spin-off companies in a Brazilian context to generate sports innovation. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wheelwright, S., & Clark, K. (1992). Creating project plans to focus product development. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  32. Wolfe, R. A. (1994). Organizational innovation: Review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 405–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Branca Terra
    • 1
  • André Ribeiro de Oliveira
    • 1
  • Mariza Almeida
    • 2
  • Luiz Alberto Batista
    • 1
  • João Alberto Neves dos Santos
    • 3
  • Jana Almeida Nogueira
    • 1
  • Leonardo Lehneman Agostinho Martins
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Ciências AdministrativasState University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Federal University of the State of Rio de JaneiroUrcaBrazil
  3. 3.Fluminense Federal UniversityNiteróiBrazil

Personalised recommendations