Advertisement

Ethics and Geoengineering: An Overview

  • Stephen M. GardinerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment book series (ETHICSSCI, volume 46)

Abstract

There is widespread agreement that ethical concerns are central to decision-making about, and governance of, geoengineering. This is especially true of the most prominent and paradigm example of climate engineering, the spraying of sulfate particles into the stratosphere in order to block incoming sunlight and so limit global warming (hereafter, ‘stratospheric sulfate injection’ (SSI)). Geoengineering ethics, like geoengineering science, is still in its early, exploratory days. This chapter offers an introductory overview of the emerging discussion and some of the challenges moving forward, taking SSI as its key example. It identifies a range of values relevant to geoengineering, exposes some misleading early framings, argues that questions of justification and context are both important, and summarizes the Tollgate principles for geoengineering governance. One theme is that despite the initial agreement on the centrality of ethics, in practice there are profound risks that ethical considerations will be marginalized, both in the short-term as research is developed, and in the longer-run, in any deployment.

Keywords

Solar radiation management Climate justice Environmental justice Perfect moral storm Geoengineering governance Tollgate principles 

References

  1. Blomfield M (2015) Geoengineering in a climate of uncertainty. In: Moss J (ed) Climate change and justice. Cambrigde University Press, Cambridge, pp 39–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buck HJ, Gammon AR, Preston CJ (2013) Gender and geoengineering. Hypatia 10(10):1–19Google Scholar
  3. Burns WCG (2013) Climate geoengineering: solar radiation management and its implications for intergenerational equity. In: Burns WCG, Strauss AL (eds) Climate change geoengineering: philosophical perspectives, legal issues, and governance frameworks, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Caldeira K (2012) Ethics of geoengineering (Food). Geoeng Google group. April 12Google Scholar
  5. Callies D (2019) Institutional legitimacy and geoengineering governance. Ethics Policy EnvironGoogle Scholar
  6. Elliot Kn (2010) Geoengineering and the precautionary principle. Int J Appl Philoso 24(2):237–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gardiner SM (2010) Is arming the future with geoengineering really the lesser evil? In: Gardiner SM, Caney S, Jamieson D, Shue H (eds) Climate ethics: essential readings. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 284–312Google Scholar
  8. Gardiner SM (2011a) A perfect moral storm. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Gardiner SM (2011b) Some early ethics of geoengineering: a commentary on the values of the royal society report. Environ Values 20:163–188Google Scholar
  10. Gardiner SM (2012) Are we the scum of the Earth? In: Thompson A, Bendik-Keymer J (eds) Ethical adaptation to climate change. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 241–260Google Scholar
  11. Gardiner SM (2013a) The desperation argument for geoengineering. PS Polit Sci Polit 46(1):28–33Google Scholar
  12. Gardiner SM (2013b) Geoengineering and moral Schizophrenia. In: Burns WCG, Strauss AL (eds) Climate change geoengineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 11–3Google Scholar
  13. Gardiner SM (2013c) Why geoengineering is not a global public good, and why it is ethically misleading to frame it as one. Climatic Change 121:513–525Google Scholar
  14. Gardiner SM (2014a) A call for a global constitutional convention focused on future generations. Ethics Int Aff 28(3):299–315Google Scholar
  15. Gardiner SM (2014b) Why global public good is a treacherous term, especially for geoengineering. Climatic Change 123:101–106Google Scholar
  16. Gardiner SM (2016) Geoengineering. In: Gardiner SM, Thompson A (eds) The oxford handbook on environmental ethics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Gardiner SM, Fragnière A (2018) The tollgate principles of geoengineering. Ethics Policy Environ 21(2):143–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gudynas E (2011) Buen vivir. Development 54(4):441–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamilton C (2013). Earthmasters. In: The dawn of the age of climate engineering. Yale University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Hale B (2012) The world that would have been: moral hazard arguments against geoengineering. In: Preston CJ (eds) Engineering the climate. the ethics of solar radiation management. Lexington Books, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  21. Hartzell-Nichols L (2012) Precaution and solar radiation management. Ethics Policy Environ 15(2):158–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hourdequin M (2019) Climate change, climate engineering, and the global poor: what does justice require? Ethics Policy EnvironGoogle Scholar
  23. Jamieson D (1996) Ethics and intentional climate change. Climatic Change 33(3):323-336Google Scholar
  24. Lenferna GA, Russotto RD, Amanda T, Gardiner SM, Ackerman TP (2017) Relevant climate response tests for stratospheric aerosol injection: a combined ethical and scientific analysis. Earth's Future 5(6):577-591Google Scholar
  25. Morrow DR, Robert EK, Michael O (2013) Political legitimacy in decisions about experiments in solar radiation management. In: Burns WCG, Strauss AL (eds) Climate change geoengineering. Philosophical perspectives, legal issues, and governance frameworks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 146–161Google Scholar
  26. Morrow DR (2014a) Starting a flood to stop a fire? Some moral constraints on solar radiation management. Ethics Policy Environ 17(2):123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morrow DR (2014b) Why geoengineering is a public good, even if its bad. Clim Change 123:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Research Council (2015) Climate intervention: reflecting sunlight to cool Earth. The National Academies Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Preston CJ (2012a) Engineering the climate. In: The ethics of solar radiation management. Lexington Books, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  30. Preston CJ (2012b) Solar radiation management and vulnerable populations. In: Preston CJ (ed) Engineering the climate. The ethics of solar radiation management. Lexington Books, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  31. Preston CJ (2017) Carbon emissions, stratospheric aerosol injection, and unintended harms. Ethics Int Aff 31(4):479-493Google Scholar
  32. Preston C, Wylie C (2019) Recognitional justice, climate engineering, and the care approach. Ethics Policy EnvironGoogle Scholar
  33. Rayner S, Heyward C, Kruger T, Pidgeon N, Redgwell C, Savulescu J (2013) The oxford principles. Clim Change 121(3):512–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rayner S, Heyward C, Kruger T, Pidgeon N, Redgwell C, Savulescu J (2009) Memorandum on draft principles for the conduct of geoengineering research. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee enquiry into the regulation of geoengineeringGoogle Scholar
  35. Ricke KL, Granger MM, Myles A (2010) Regional climate response to solar radiation management. Nat Geosci 3:537–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ricke KL, Caldeira K, Moreno-Cruz JB (2013) Strategic incentives for climate geoengineering coalitions to exclude broad participation. Environ Res Lett 8(1):014021Google Scholar
  37. Rickles W, Quaas MF, Ricke K, Quaas J, Moreno Cruz J, Smulders S. (2018). Turning down the global thermostat. Kiel Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  38. Sandler R (2012) Solar radiation management and nonhuman species. In: Perston CJ (ed) Engineering the climate. The ethics of solar radiation management. Lexington Books, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  39. Scott D (2018) Philosophy of technology and geoengineering. In: Blackstock JJ, Low Sean (eds) Geoengineering our climate? Ethics, politics, and governance. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith PT (2012) Domination and the ethics of solar radiation management. In: Preston CJ (ed) Engineering the climate. The ethics of solar radiation management. Lexington Books, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith PT (2019) Legitimacy and non-domination in solar radiation management research. Ethics Policy EnvironGoogle Scholar
  42. Shepherd J et al (2009) Geoengineering the climate. In: Science, governance and uncertainty. The Royal SocietyGoogle Scholar
  43. Svoboda T (2017) The ethics of climate engineering. In: Solar radiation management and non-ideal justice. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Watene K (2016) Valuing nature: Māori philosophy and the capability approach. Oxf Dev Stud 44(3):287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whyte KP (2012) Now this! Indigenous sovereignty, political obliviousness and governance models for SRM research. Ethics Policy Environ 15(2):172–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Whyte KP (2019) Indigeneity in geoengineering discourses: some considerations. Ethics Policy EnvironGoogle Scholar
  47. Wong P-H (2015) Consenting to geoengineering. Philoso Technol 29(2):173–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Program on EthicsUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations