• Luca ValeraEmail author
  • Juan Carlos Castilla
Part of the Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment book series (ETHICSSCI, volume 46)


Recent technological developments and new scientific tools regarding socio-ecological systems have created new global settings, which bring to the core new environmental problems, approaches, challenges, and conflicts. The very essence of this new global context invites to a re-evaluation of traditional ethical, political, and socio-ecological categories. The critical challenge is to understand and account for the interdisciplinary dynamics of nature and social changes, and the novel complex processes existing between and within these dynamics. Without this kind of approach, we will be unable to evaluate the best actions (if any) to take in the present for both current and future generations.


  1. Barnosky AD, Hadly EA, Bascompte J, Berlow EL, Brown JH, Fortelius M et al (2012) Approaching a state shift in earth’s biosphere. Nature 486:52–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brewer GD (1999) The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sci 32(4):327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Castilla JC (2016) Viewpoints of an ecologist on practical environmental ethic: socio-ecology, common-poll resources and conservation. Cuadernos de Bioética 27:403–414Google Scholar
  4. Castilla-Rho JC, Rojas R, Andersen MS, Holley C, Mariethoz G (2017) Social tipping points in global groundwater management. Nature Human Behav 1:640–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) The “anthropocene”. Global Change Newslett 41:17–18Google Scholar
  6. Fisher J, Gardner TA, Bennett EM, Balvanera P, Biggs R, Carpenter S et al (2015) Advancing sustainability through mainstreaming a social-ecological systems perspective. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:144–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Francis (2015) Encyclical letter Laudato Si’ on care for our common home. Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Città del VaticanoGoogle Scholar
  8. Gardiner SM, Thompson A (2017) Introducing contemporary environmental ethics. In: Gardiner SM, Thompson A (eds) The Oxford handbook of environmental ethics. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  9. Johnson N (2012) Simply complexity: a clear guide to complexity theory. Oneworld, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Jonas H (1984) The imperative of responsibility: in search of an ethics for the technological age. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Kutz C (2000) Complicity: ethics and law for a collective age. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Norton Brian G (2003) Searching for sustainability: interdisciplinary essays in the philosophy of conservation biology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Potter VR (1971) Bioethics: bridge to the future. Prentice Hall, Houghton MifflinGoogle Scholar
  14. Potter VR (1988) Global bioethics: building on the Leopold legacy. Michigan State University Press, East LansingGoogle Scholar
  15. Regan T (1983) The case for animal rights. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  16. Scruton R (2012) How to think seriously about the planet: the case for an environmental conservatism. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Sandler R (ed.) (2014) Ethics and emerging technologies. Palgrave, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sheffer M (2009) Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  19. Singer P (1981) The expanding circle: ethics, evolution, and moral progress. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  20. Singer P (2011) Practical ethics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Turner BL II, Clark WC, Kates RW, Richards JF, Mathews JT, Meyer WB (1990) The earth as transformed by human action: global and regional changes in the biosphere over the past 300 years. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Valera L (2015) Tecnologia ed ecologia: dall’etica alla metafisica, dalla negazione del limite alla negazione dell’uomo. Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica 71(269):1453–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Valera L (2016a) El futuro de la ecología: la sabiduría como centro especulativo de la ética ambiental. Cuadernos de Bioética 27(3):329–338Google Scholar
  24. Valera L (2016b) La bioetica di Potter: la ricerca della saggezza all’origine della bioetica e dell’etica ambientale. Medicina e morale 65(6):719–732Google Scholar
  25. Wilson EO (2012) The social conquest of earth. Liveright Publishing Corporation, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Bioethics and Department of PhilosophyPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiago de ChileChile
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Center for Bioethics and Interdisciplinary Center for Global Change (CCG-UC)Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiago de ChileChile

Personalised recommendations