Advertisement

From Utility to Dignity: Humanism in Human Resource Management

  • Greg LatemoreEmail author
  • Peter Steane
  • Robin Kramar
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

Human resource management (HRM) refers to the practices utilized to manage the people who do the work of organizations. This chapter proposes that there are a number of ways of conceptualizing HRM, including SHRM, humanistic management, and personalistic management. These three perspectives are based on different ontologies with varied assumptions about the people engaged in the work of organizations.

References

  1. Acevedo, A. (2012). Personalist business ethics and humanistic management: Insights into Jacques Maritain. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AD [Amsterdam Declaration]. (2002). The fundamentals of modern humanism. International Humanist and Ethical Union. Accessed September 9, 2018, from https://iheu.org/about/humanism/the-amsterdam-declaration
  3. Aguado, R., Alcañiz, L., & Retolaza, J. L. (2015). A new role for the firm incorporating sustainability and human dignity: Conceptualization and measurement. Human Systems Management, 34, 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aguado, R., Alcañiz, L., Retolaza, J. L., & Albareda, L. (2016). Jesuit business education model: In search of a new role for the firm based on sustainability and dignity. Journal of Technology, Management and Innovation, 11(1), 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aguado, R., Retolaza, J. L., & Alcañiz, L. (2017). Dignity at the level of the firm: Beyond the stakeholder approach. In M. Kostera & M. Pirson (Eds.), Dignity and the organization. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. AHA [American Humanist Association]. (2018). Definition of humanism. Accessed September 9, 2018, from https://americanhumanist.org
  7. Alford, H. (2010). The practical wisdom of personalism. Journal of Management Development, 29(7–8), 697–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ananthram, S., Teo, S. T., Connell, J., & Bish, A. (2017). Control and involvement HR practices in Indian call centres: Still searching for answers. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 35(1). Accessed December 12, 2017, from  https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arjoon, S., Turriago-Hoyos, A., & Thoene, U. (2018). Virtuousness and the common good as a conceptual framework for harmonizing the goals of the individual, organizations, and the economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 147, 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Arnaud, S., & Wasieleski, D. M. (2014). Corporate humanistic responsibility: Social performance through managerial discretion of the HRM. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 313–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barney, J. B., & Felin, T. (2013). What are microfoundations? The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 138–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barney, J. B., & Wright, P. M. (1998). On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 37(1), 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27, 625–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Battaglia, V. (2005). Building a new Christendom. Australian eJournal of Theology, 5. Accessed December 6, 2017, from http://aejt.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/395516/AEJT_5.14_Battaglia.pdf
  15. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital. New York: Columbia.Google Scholar
  16. Becker, G. S. (1996). The economic way of looking at behavior: The Nobel lecture. Essays in Public Policy, No. 69. Palo Alto, CA: Hoover Institution, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  17. Beer, M., Boselie, P., & Brewster, C. (2015). Back to the future: Implications for the field of HRM of the multi-stakeholder perspective proposed 30 years ago. Human Resource Management, 54(3), 427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P., Mills, Q., & Nalthon, R. (1984). Managing human assets. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  19. Boxall, P., Ang, S. H., & Bartram, T. (2011). Analysing the ‘black box’ of HRM: Uncovering HR goals, mediators, and outcomes in the standardized service environment. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7), 1504–1532. Accessed September 20, 2018, from  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00973.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2008). Strategy and human resource management. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Brown, M., Metz, I., Cregan, C., & Kulik, C. T. (2009). Irreconcilable differences? Strategic human resource management and employee wellbeing. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 47(3), 270–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Buber, M. (1958). I and Thou (R. G. Smith, Trans.). Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
  23. Buber, M. (1975). Between man and man. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Capaldi, N. (2004). Jacques Maritain: La vie intellectuelle. The Review of Metaphysics, 58(2), 399–421.Google Scholar
  25. Cavanagh, J., Bartram, T., Meacham, H., Bigby, C., Oakman, J., & Fossey, E. (2017). Supporting workers with disabilities: A scoping review of the role of HRM in contemporary organizations. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 55, 6–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church (CSDC). (2004). Pontifical council for justice and peace. Vatican City.Google Scholar
  27. De Gama, N., McKenna, S., & Peticca-Harris, A. (2013). Ethics and HRM: Theoretical and conceptual analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Delbridge, R. (2006). Extended review: The vitality of labor process analysis. Organization Studies, 27(8), 1209–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Descartes, R. [1644] (2009). Letter of the author to the French translator of the principles of philosophy serving for a preface (J. Veitch, Trans.), Selections from the principles of philosophy. Michigan: Ezreads Publications LLC, & Hatfield, G. (2016). ‘René Descartes’. Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2016 edition). Retrieved May 31, 2016, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/descartes
  31. Dierksmeier, C. (2015). Human dignity and the business of business. Human Systems Management, 34, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Drucker, P. (1954). The practice of management. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  33. Edgar, F., & Geare, A. (2014). An employee-centered analysis: Professionals’ experiences and reactions to HRM. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(5), 673–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Evans, J. W. (1952, April). Jacques Maritain’s personalism. The Review of Politics, 14(2), 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ferris, G. R., Hall, A. T., Todd Royle, M., & Martocchio, J. J. (2004). Theoretical developments in the field of human resources management: Issues and challenges for the future. Organizational Analysis, 12(3), 231–254.Google Scholar
  36. Fontrodona, J., & Sison, A. J. G. (2006). The nature of the firm, agency theory and shareholder theory: A critique from philosophical anthropology. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fortier, M., & Albert, M.-N. (2015). From resource to human being: Towards persons management, SAGE Open, 5(3), 1–15. Accessed May 31, 2017, from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244015604347
  38. Freeman, R. E., & Ginena, K. (2015). Rethinking the purpose of the corporation: Challenges from stakeholder theory. Notizie di Politeia, XXXI, 117, 9–18.Google Scholar
  39. Frémeaux, S., & Michelson, G. (2017). The common good of the firm and humanistic management: Conscious capitalism and the economy of communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 145, 701–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Gade, C. B. N. (2012). What is ‘ubuntu’? Different interpretations among South Africans of African descent. South African Journal of Philosophy, 31(3), 484–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gassi, W., & Habisch, A. (2011). Ethics and economics: Towards a new humanistic. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. (1998). The individualized corporation. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  44. Gorman, M. (2011). Personhood, potentiality and normativity. The American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 85(3), 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(1), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Greenwood, M. R. (2002). Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Greenwood, M. R. (2013). Ethical analysis of HRM: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gronbacher, G. (1998). The need for economic personalism. The Journal of Markets and Morality, 1(1), 1–34.Google Scholar
  49. Guest, D. (1987). Human resource management and industrial relations. Journal of Management Studies, 24(5), 503–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Guillen, M., Ferrero, I., & Hoffman, W. M. (2015, February). The neglected ethical and spiritual motivations in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(4), 803–816. Accessed September 20, 2018, from  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1985-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Habermas, J. (1988). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 2). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  52. Harney, B. (2014). Researching HRM to enhance understanding: The neglected role of ontology. In C. Machado & J. P. Davim (Eds.), Work organization and human resource management (pp. 153–163). Bern: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hicks, D. (2011). Dignity: Its essential role in resolving conflict. Pennsylvania: The Maple Press.Google Scholar
  54. Hill, T. E. (1980). Humanity as an end in itself. Ethics, 91(1), 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hill, C. D. (2013). Who am I? Experience as the unity between the person and the world in the philosophy of Gabriel Marcel (1889–1973), an unpublished dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
  56. Hodson, R. (2001). Dignity at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Holley, R. (1978). Religious education and religious understanding: An introduction to the philosophy of religious education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  58. Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  59. Honneth, A. (2008). Reification and recognition: A new look at an old idea. In M. Jay (Ed.), Reification: A new look at an old idea (pp. 17–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Honneth, A., & Margalit, A. (2001). Recognition. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 75, 111–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672.Google Scholar
  62. Islam, G. (2012). Recognition, reification, and practices of forgetting: Ethical implications of human resource management. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Islam, G. (2013). Recognising employees: Reification, dignity and promoting care in management. Cross Cultural Management, 20(2), 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Janssens, M., & Steyaert, C. (1999). The inhuman space of HRM: Sensing the subject. Organization, 6(2), 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. H. (1994). The nature of man. The Journal of Applied and Corporate Finance, Summer, 4–19.Google Scholar
  66. Jiang, K., & Messersmith, J. (2018). On the shoulders of giants: A meta-review of strategic human resource management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(1), 6–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Johnsen, R., & Gudmand-Høyer, M. (2010). Lacan and the lack of humanity in HRM. Organization, 17(3), 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking fast and slow. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  69. Kamoche, K. (1996). Strategic human resource management within a resource-capability view of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 33(2), 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kant, I. [1785] (1964). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (H. J. Paton, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  71. Kant, I. [1797] (1964) The doctrine of virtue (M. J. Gregor, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  72. Kaufman, B. E. (2010, April). SHRM theory in the post-Huselid era: Why it is fundamentally misspecified. Industrial Relations, 49(2), 286–313.Google Scholar
  73. Kaufman, B. E. (2015, May–June). Evolution of strategic HRM as seen through two founding books: A 30th anniversary perspective on development of the field. Human Resource Management, 54(3), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kaye, L. (1999). Strategic human resources management in Australia: The human cost. International Journal of Manpower, 20(8), 577–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Keenoy, T. (1997). HRMism and the language of re-presentation. Journal of Management Studies, 34(5), 825–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Kinsey, S. (2012). Professional partner or management’s bitch? A discourse analytic study of the identity construction of HR practitioners in English local government, PhD thesis, The University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  77. Kitwood, T. (1997). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Kramar, R. (2014). Beyond strategic human resource management: Is sustainable human resource management the next approach? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(8), 1069–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Kramar, R., Bartram, T., De Cheri, H., Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2014). Human resource management: Strategy, people, performance, 5e. North Ryde, NSW: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  80. Kramar, R., & Holland, P. (2015). Capstone HRM: Dynamics and ambiguity in the workplace. Prahan, VIC: Tilde University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Legge, K. (1999). Representing people at work. Organization, 6(2), 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. The Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Li, Y. (2012). The philosophical underpinnings of Western HRM theory. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 7(2), 317–346.Google Scholar
  84. Lukács, G. [1923] (1971). Reification and the consciousness of the proletariat. In History and class consciousness (pp. 83–222) (R. Livingstone, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  85. Lv, Z., & Xu, T. (2018). Psychological contract breach, high-performance work system and engagement: The mediated effect of person-organization fit. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(7), 1257–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Macklin, R. (2006). The moral autonomy of human resource managers. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 44(2), 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Malloy, D. C., & Hadjistavropoulos, T. (2004). The problem of pain management among persons with dementia, personhood, and the ontology of relationships. Nursing Philosophy, 5, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Mariappanadar, S. (2014). Stakeholder harm index: A framework to review work intensification from the critical HRM perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 24, 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Maritain, J. [1936] (1996). Integral humanism: Freedom in the modern world and a letter on independence – The collected works of Jacques Maritain, Volume II, O. Bird (Ed.), (O. Bird, J. Evans, & R. O’Sullivan, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  90. Maritain, J. [1947] (1966). The person and the common good (J. J. Fitzgerald, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  91. Melé, D. (2003). The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Melé, D. (2008). Integrating ethics into management. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Melé, D. (2009). Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The personalistic and the common good principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Melé, D. (2016). Understanding humanistic management. Humanistic Management Journal, 1, 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Molina-Azorin, J. (2014). Micro-foundations of strategic management: Toward micro-foundational research in resource-based theory. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 17(2), 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Mounier, E. (1951). Be not afraid: A denunciation of despair (C. Rowland, Trans.). London: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
  97. Nag, R., Hambrick, D. C., & Chen, M.-J. (2007). What is strategic management really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Management Journal, 28(9), 935–955.Google Scholar
  98. Nankervis, A., Baird, M., Coffey, J., & Shields, J. (2017). Human resource management: Strategy and practice, 9e. South Melbourne: Cenage.Google Scholar
  99. Naughton, M. J., Alford, H., & Brady, B. (1995). The common good and the purpose of the firm: A critique of the shareholder and stakeholder models from the Catholic social tradition. Journal of Human Values, 1(2), 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Neesham, C., Hartel, C. J., Coghill, K., & Sarros, J. C. (2010). Profit-making vs. human value: Philosophy’s contribution. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 29(6), 593–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Obioha, P. U. (2014). A communitarian understanding of the human person as a philosophical basis for human development. The Journal of Pan African Studies, 6(8), 247–267.Google Scholar
  102. Pirson, M. (2015). Conceptualizing humanistic management as an alternative to managing in a post-crisis world. Human Systems Management Journal, 34, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Pirson, M. (2017a). Dignity and well-being as cornerstones of humanistic management. Humanistic Management Association. Research paper series no. 17-19. Gabelli School of Business, Fordham University Research Paper No. 2916454. Accessed May 10, 2016, from  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2916454
  104. Pirson, M. (2017b). Working alternatives: From capitalism to humanistic management? (May 1). Humanistic Management Association. Research paper series no. 17-25. Accessed May 10, 2016, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2961559
  105. Pirson, M. (2017c). Humanistic management: Protecting and promoting well-being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Pirson, M., & Kimakowitz, E. (2010). Towards a human-centered theory and practice of the firm. SSRN Electronic Journal. Accessed September 20, 2018, from  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1654827
  107. Pirson, M., & Lawrence, P. R. (2009). Humanism in business – Towards a paradigm shift? Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 553–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Powell, T. C. (2014). Strategic management and the person. Strategic Organization, 12(3), 200–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Pritchard, K. (2010). Becoming an HR strategic partner: Tales of transition. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(2), 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Renwick, D. (2003). HR managers: Guardians of employee wellbeing? Personnel Review, 32(3), 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Retolaza, J. L., Aguado, R., & Alcañiz, L. (2018). Stakeholder theory through the lenses of Catholic social thought. Journal of Business Ethics. Accessed September 10, 2018, from  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3963-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Retolaza, J. L., San-José, L., & Ruíz-Roqueñi, M. (2016). Social accounting for sustainability: Monetizing the social value. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  114. Sen, A. (2002). Rationality and freedom, 2e. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  115. Sennett, R. (1999). How work destroys social inclusion. New Statesman, 31st May, London, 25–27.Google Scholar
  116. Simons, R. (1995). Rediscovering the common good. In S. Rees & G. Rodley (Eds.), The human costs of managerialism: Advocating the recovery of humanity (pp. 271–284). Leichardt, NSW: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  117. Sison, A. J. G. (2007). Toward a common good theory of the firm: The Tasubinsa case. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Sison, A. J. G., & Fontrodona, J. (2012). The common good of the firm in the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 211–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Spencer, D. A. (2013). Barbarians at the gate: A critical appraisal of the influence of economics on the field and practice of HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(4), 346–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Spitzeck, H. (2011). An integrated model of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Steyaert, C., & Janssens, M. (1999). Human and inhuman resource management: Saving the subject of HRM. Organization, 6(2), 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Turkson, P. K. A. (2017). Pope Francis’ integral human development: An inclusive growth proposal. Humanist Management Journal. Accessed December 20, 2017, from  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-017-0030-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Ulrich, D. (2012). HR talent and the new HR competencies. Strategic HR Review, 11(4), 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Ulrich, D. (2015). Are we there yet? What’s next for HR? Human Resource Management Review, 25, 188–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. UNDHR. (1948). The United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. General Assembly Resolution, 217-A. Accessed December 10, 2017, from http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights
  126. Van Buren, H. J., III, Greenwood, M., & Sheehan, C. (2011). Strategic human resource management and the decline of the employee focus. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Van De Voorde, K., & Beijer, S. (2015). The role of employee HR attributions in the relationships between high-performance work systems and employee outcomes. Human Resource Management Journal, 25(1), 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Väyrynen, T., & Laari-Salmela, S. (2018). Men, mammals, or machines? Dehumanization embedded in organizational practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(1), 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. von Kimakowitz, E. (2017). An introduction to humanistic management. Accessed December 10, 2017, from https://www.soka.ac.jp/files/ja/20170419 14025.pdf
  130. Waldron, J. (2009). Dignity, rank, and rights. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, University of California, Berkeley, April 21–23. Accessed September 20, 2018, from https://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/w/Waldron_09.pdf
  131. Warren, R. C. (2000). Putting the person back into human resource management. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 19(3 & 4), 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Weisbord, M. R. (1987). Productive workplaces revisited: Organizing and managing for dignity, meaning and community. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  133. Whetstone, J. T. (2002). Personalism and moral leadership: The servant leader with a transforming vision. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(4), 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Wilcox, T., & Lowry, D. (2000). Beyond resourcefulness: Casual workers and the human-centered organization. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 19(3 & 4), 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Williams, T. D., & Bengtsson, J. O. (2016) Personalism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer ed.). Accessed December 11, 2017, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/personalism
  136. Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  137. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations, G. E. M. Anscombe & R. Rhees (Eds.), (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  138. Wright, P. M., & McMahon, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 18(2), 295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Wright, P., & McMahan, G. C. (2011). Exploring human capital: Putting human back into strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(2), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Wright, P. M., & Snell, S. A. (2005). Partner or guardian? HR’s challenge in balancing value and values. Human Resource Management, 44(2), 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Wright, P. M., & Ulrich, M. D. (2017). A road well-travelled: The past, present, and future journey of strategic human resource management. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behaviour, 4, 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Notre Dame AustraliaSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations