Advertisement

Integral Human Development Through Servant Leadership and Psychological Androgyny

  • Alejandro AmillanoEmail author
  • Josune Baniandrés
  • Leire Gartzia
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

Humanistic management has emerged as a movement that aims at transferring humanistic principles to the management of organisations, promoting in business respect of human dignity, the consideration of ethical implications and corporate responsibility for a sustainable dialogue with the different stakeholders (Melé, 2016). This approach is closely associated with the concept of integral human development (IHD) and the broader consideration of human dignity as an essential factor for human development (Velisario, 2017). From this perspective human dignity is understood as a key element and requires that organizations are not only willing to provide individuals with development in relation to material dimensions (access to goods and services), but also in relation to the necessary social and cultural conditions for human development (see Melé, 2016).

References

  1. Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751–763.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguado, R., Retolaza, J. L., & Alcaniz, L. (2017). Dignity at the level of the firm: Beyond the stakeholder approach. In M. Pirson & M. Kostera (Eds.), Dignity and the organization. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  4. Bales, R. F. (1951). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barbuto, J. E., & Gifford, G. T. (2010). Examining sex differences of the servant leadership dimensions: An analysis of the agentic and communal properties of the servant leadership questionnaire. The Journal of Leadership Education, 9(2), 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbuto, J. E., & Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group and Organization Management, 31(3), 300–326.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106287091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baril, G., Elbert, N., Maher-Potter, S., & Reavy, G. (1989). Are androgynous managers really more effective? Group and Organization Studies, 14(2), 234–249.  https://doi.org/10.1177/105960118901400210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beazley, D. A. (2002). Spiritual orientation of a leader and perceived servant leader behavior: A correlational study. Doctoral dissertation. Minneapolis, Walden University.Google Scholar
  9. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  11. Boyer, G. B. (1999). Turning points in the development of male servant-leaders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Fielding Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Bozionelos, N., & Bozionelos, G. (2003). Instrumental and expressive traits: Their relationship and their association with biological sex. Social Behavior and Personality, 31(4), 423–429.  https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2003.31.4.423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brewer, N., Mitchell, P., & Weber, N. (2002). Gender role, organization status, and conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(1), 78–94.  https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022868 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bursik, K. (1995). Gender-related personality traits and ego development: Differential patterns for men and women. Sex Roles, 32(9/10), 601–615.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dansereau, F., Seitzb, S. R., Chiuc, C.-Y., Shaughnessyd, B., & Yammarinoe, F. J. (2013). What makes leadership, leadership? Using self-expansion theory to integrate traditional and contemporary approaches. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 798–821.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diehl, S. (2015). A gendered view of servant leadership. Doctoral dissertation. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  17. Eliade, M. (1965). Mephistopheles and the androgyne (J. M. Cohen trans.). New York: Sheed and Ward.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000306515600400104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Erikson, E. H. (1956). The problem of ego identity. Journal of the American Psycoanalytic Association, 4(1), 56–121.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000306515600400104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferch, S. R. (2004). Servant-leadership, forgiveness, and social justice. In L. C. Spears & M. Lawrence (Eds.), Practicing servant leadership: Succeeding through trust, bravery, and forgiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar
  21. Freud, S. (1992). Introducción del Narcisismo. En S. Freud, Obras Completas de Sigmund Freud. (Vol. 14, pp. 65–98). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu editores.Google Scholar
  22. Frimer, J. A., Walker, L. J., Lee, B. H., Riches, A., & Dunlop, W. L. (2012). Hierarchical integration of agency and communion: A study of influential moral figures. Journal of Personality, 80(4), 1117–1145.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00764.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gartzia, L., & Van Engen, M. (2012). Are (male) leaders ‘feminine’ enough? gender traits of identity as mediators of sex differences in leadership styles. Gender in Management, 27(5), 295–314.  https://doi.org/10.1108/17542411211252624 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gartzia, L., Amillano, A., & Baniandrés, J. (2016). Women in Industrial Relations: Overcoming Gender Biases. In M. C. Euwema, L. Munduate, P. Elgoibar, E. Pender, & A. B. García (Eds.), Building trust and constructive conflict management in industrial relations. Human resources management and constructive conflict management. The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Gartzia, L., Aritzeta, A., Balluerka, N., & Barberá, E. (2012). Inteligencia emocional y género: más allá de las diferencias sexuales. Anales de Psicología, 28(2), 567–575.  https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.28.2.124111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gilligan, C. (1985). La moral y la teoría: Psicología del desarrollo femenino. México D.F: Fondo cultural económico de México.Google Scholar
  28. Greenleaf, R. K. (1977, 2002). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  29. Greenleaf, R. K. (2003). The servant as leader. In H. Beazley, J. Beggs, & L. C. Spears (Eds.), The servant-leader within: A transformative path (pp. 31–74). Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, J. A., & Taylor, M. C. (1985). Psychological androgyny and the masculinity X femininity interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(2), 429–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halpin, A., & Winer, B. (1952). The leadership behavior of the airplane commander. Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  32. Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1998). A theory of unmitigated communion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 173–183.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1974). So you want to know your leadership style? Training and Development Journal, 28(2), 22–37.Google Scholar
  34. House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis? Journal of Management, 23(3), 409–473.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jurma, W. E., & Powell, M. L. (1994). Perceived gender roles of managers and effective conflict management. Psychological Reports, 74(1), 104–106.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.74.1.104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaplan, A. G. (1979). Clarifying the concept of androgyny: Implications for therapy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 3(3), 223–230.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1979.tb00539.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kark, R., Waismel-Manor, R., & Shamir, B. (2012). Does valuing androgyny and femininity lead to a female advantage? The relationship between gender-role, transformational leadership and identification. Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 620–640.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kirchmeyer, C. (1996). Gender roles and decision-making in demographically diverse groups: A case for reviving androgyny. Sex Roles, 34(9), 649–663.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01551500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  40. Korabik, K. (1981, marzo). Androgyny and leadership: An integration. Comunicación presentada en ‘the annual meeting of the Association for Women and Psychology, Boston, MA’. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED208-274).Google Scholar
  41. Korabik, K. (1982a). Sex-role orientation and leadership style. International. Journal of Women’s Studies, 5, 328–336.Google Scholar
  42. Korabik, K. (1982b, agosto). Sex-role orientation and leadership: Further explorations. Comunicación presentada en ‘the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC’. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED223-963).Google Scholar
  43. Korabik, K., & Ayman, R. (1987, agosto). Androgyny and leadership style: A conceptual synthesis. Comunicación presentada en ‘the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, NY’. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED291-032).Google Scholar
  44. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Liao, C., & Meuser, J. D. (2014). Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1434–1452.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Meuser, J. D., Hu, J., Wu, J., & Liao, C. (2015). Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 254–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Loder, J. E. (1998). The logic of the spirit: Human development in theological perspective. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  47. Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego development: Conceptions and theories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  48. Maheshwari, N., & Kumar, V. (2008). Personal effectiveness as a function of psychological androgyny. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 17(1), 39–45.Google Scholar
  49. Marsh, H. W., & Byrne, B. M. (1991). Differentiated additive androgyny model: Relations between masculinity, feminity, and multiple dimensions of self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(5), 811–828.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.5.811 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Martin, C. L., Cook, R. E., & Andrews, N. C. Z. (2016). Reviving androgyny: A modern day perspective on flexibility of gender identity and behavior. Sex Roles. First on-line: marzo, 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0602-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maslow, A. H., Frager, R., & Cox, R. (1970). In J. Fadiman & C. McReynolds (Eds.), Motivation and personality (Vol. 2). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  52. Melé, D. (2016). Understanding humanistic management. Humanistic Management Journal, 1(1), 33–95.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-016-0011-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Oser, F. I. (1991). The development of religious judgment. Religious development in childhood and adolescence. New Directions for Child Development, 1991(52), 5–25.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219915203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Page, D., & Wong, P. T. P. (2000). A conceptual framework for measuring servant leadership. In E. S. Adjibolooso (Ed.), The human factor in shaping the course of history and development (pp. 69–109). Lanham, MD: American University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Parsons, T., & Bales, R. (1955). Family, socialization, and interaction processes. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  56. Piaget, J. (1926). The language and thought of the child. New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.Google Scholar
  57. Prager, K., & Bailey, J. (1985). Androgyny, ego development, and psychosocial crisis resolution. Sex Roles, 13(9–10), 525–536.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Retolaza, J. L., Aguado, R., & Alcaniz, L. (2018). La Teoría del Stakeholder a través del Pensamiento Social Cristiano 2018. Journal Business of Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3963-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reynolds, K. (2011). Servant-leadership as gender-integrative leadership: Paving a path to gender-integrative organizations through leadership education. Journal of Leadership Education, 10(2), 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Reynolds, K. (2016). Servant-leadership: A feminist perspective. International Journal of Servant Leadership, 10(1). Recuperado de: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/21599/
  61. Spears, L. C. (2002). Introduction: Tracing the past, present, and future of servant-leadership. In E. L. C. Spears & M. Lawrence (Eds.), Focus on leadership: Servant-leadership for the twenty-first century (pp. 1–16). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  62. Spears, L. C. (2003). Introduction. En H. Beazley, J. Beggs, and L. Spears, (Eds.), The servantleader within: A transformative path (pp. 13-28). Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  63. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1980). Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5(2), 147–163.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1980.tb00951.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. Journal Supplement Abstract Service Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43 (Ms. No. 617).Google Scholar
  65. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(1), 29–39.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076857 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Srivastava, N., & Nair, S. K. (2011). Androgyny and rational emotive behaviour as antecedents of managerial effectiveness. Vision, 15(4), 303–314.  https://doi.org/10.1177/097226291101500401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stogdill, R. M., & Coons, A. E. (1957). Leader behavior: Its description and measurement. Columbus: Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University (Research Monograph 84).Google Scholar
  68. Taylor, M. C., & Hall, J. A. (1982). Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 92(2), 347–366.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant-leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380462 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Velisario, R. (June, 2017). Desarrollo Humano Integral vs. Enfoque del Desarrollo Humano y las Capacidades. Paper presented at III Simposio UNIJES de Pensamiento Social Cristiano. Universidad de Deusto, Spain.Google Scholar
  71. Walker, L. J. (2013). Exemplars’ moral behavior is self-regarding. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2013(142), 27–40.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Walker, L. J., & Frimer, J. A. (2015). Developmental trajectories of agency and communion in moral motivation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 61(3), 412–439.  https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.61.3.0412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ward, C. A. (2000). Models and measurements of psychological androgyny: A cross-cultural extension of theory and research. Sex Roles, 43(7), 529–552.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007171500798 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Woodhill, B. M., & Samuels, C. A. (2003). Positive and negative androgyny and their relationship with psychological health and well-being. Sex Roles, 48(11), 555–565.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023531530272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alejandro Amillano
    • 1
    Email author
  • Josune Baniandrés
    • 2
  • Leire Gartzia
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Psychology and EducationUniversity of DeustoBilbaoSpain
  2. 2.Deusto Business SchoolUniversity of DeustoBilbaoSpain

Personalised recommendations