Advertisement

Dynamic Distance Based Lifetime Enhancement Scheme for HWSN

  • Sumit Kumar Gupta
  • Sachin Kumar
  • Sudhanshu TyagiEmail author
  • Sudeep Tanwar
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 597)

Abstract

Nowadays Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) is popular research field for new scholars. This technique has huge potential in various fields like energy efficiency, data gathering, network security, etc. The bitty sensor nodes are formed a wireless sensor network which has capabilities of communication, transmission and sensing with certain limitations. Limited capability of energy or battery life which attracts many scholars to do the research and find appropriate solutions. Cluster-based heterogeneous WSN (HWSN) is a possible solution to improve the network life time. Keeping in the view of above, this is the key area we have taken in this paper to improve the network life time with the use of less battery consumption. Here, we proposed “Dynamic Distance based Lifetime Enhancement scheme for Heterogeneous WSN”. In the proposed scheme cluster head is selected by dynamic hopping for data transmission to base station. By the selection of dynamics hopping transmission, network life time improved significantly as compared to pre-existing techniques like LEACH, SEECP protocol.

Keywords

WSN Clustering Companion node Dynamic radius Dynamic hopping 

References

  1. 1.
    Afsar, M.M., Tayarani-N, M.: Clustering in sensor networks: a literature survey. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 46, 198226 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pantazis, N.A., Nikolidakis, S.A., Vergados, D.D.: Energy-efficient routing protocols in wireless sensor networks: a survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 15(2), 551591 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rostami, A.S., Badkoobe, M., Mohanna, F., Keshavarz, H., Hosseinabadi, A.A.R., Sangaiah, A.K.: Survey on clustering in heterogeneous and homogeneous wireless sensor networks. J. Supercomput. 7(4), 277–323 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Memon, I., Hussain, I., Akhtar, R., Chen, G.: Enhanced privacy and authentication: an efficient and secure anonymous communication for location based service using asymmetric cryptography scheme. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 84, 1487–1508 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar, S., Verma, S.K., Kumar, A.: Enhanced threshold sensitive stable election protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 85, 16 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heinzelman, W.B., Chandrakasan, A., Balakrishnan, H.: Energy efficient communication protocol for wireless micro sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-33), p. 223. IEEE (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smaragdakis, G., Matta, I., Bestavros, A.: SEP: a stable election protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on SANPA (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumar, D., Aseri, T.C., Patel, R.: B-EEHC-energy efficient heterogeneous clustered scheme for wireless sensor networks. Comput. Commun. 32, 662667 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tyagi, S., Kumar, N.: A systematic review on clustering and routing techniques based upon LEACH protocol for wireless sensor networks. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 36(2), 623–645 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tyagi, S., Gupta, S.K., Tanwar, S., Kumar, N.: EHE-LEACH: enhanced heterogeneous LEACH protocol for lifetime enhancement of wireless SNs, 978-12013 IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mittal, N., Singh, U.: Distance-based residual energy efficient stable election protocol for WSNs. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 40, 1637–1646 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Benkirane, S., Benihssane, A., Hasnaoui, M.L., Laghdir, M.: Distance based stable election protocol (DB-SEP) for heterogeneous wireless sensor network. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 58(16), 915 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kumar, D., Aseri, T.C., Patel, R.B.: Multi-hop communication routing (MCR) protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Commun. Converg. 1(2), 130–145 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tanwar, S., Kumar, N., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C.: A systematic review on heterogeneous routing protocols for wireless sensor network. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 53, 39–56 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Manjeshwar, A., Agrawal, D. P.: TEEN: a routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS’01) workshops, pp. 2009–2015. San Francisco, CA, USA (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kashaf, A., Javaid, N., Khan, Z.A., Khan, I.A.: TSEP: threshold-sensitive stable election protocol for WSNs. In: Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology, pp. 164168. IEEE, Islamabad (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mittal, N., Singh, U., Sohi Singh, B.: SEECP: a stable energy efficient clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Netw. 23, 18091821 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, J., Chen, J.: ACDH: An adaptive clustering algorithm for dynamic heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Netw. (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singh, S., Chand, S., Kumar, B.: Multilevel heterogeneous network model for wireless sensor networks. Telecomm. Syst. 64, 259277 (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tyagi, S., Tanwar, S., Gupta, S.K., Kumar, N., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C.: A lifetime extended multi-levels heterogeneous routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Telecommun. Syst. (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rizk, R., Farouk, F., Zaki, F.W.: Towards energy efficiency and stability in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 96, 43474365 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zaatouri, I., Guilou, A.B., Alyaoui, N., Kachouri, A.: A comparative study of the energy efficient clustering protocols in heterogeneous and homogeneous wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 97, 64536468 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aznoli, F., Navimipour, N.J.: Deployment strategies in the wireless sensor networks: systematic literature review, classification, and current trends. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 95, 819–846 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sumit Kumar Gupta
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sachin Kumar
    • 3
  • Sudhanshu Tyagi
    • 4
    Email author
  • Sudeep Tanwar
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of ECESRMS College of Engineering, Technology and ResearchBareillyIndia
  2. 2.Department of ECE, Amity School of Engineering & TechnologyLucknow CampusIndia
  3. 3.Department of ECEAmity School of Engineering and TechnologyLucknow CampusIndia
  4. 4.Department of ECEThapar Institute of Engineering & TechnologyPatialaIndia
  5. 5.Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Institute of TechnologyNirma UniversityAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations