Advertisement

Motivators, Contributors, and Inhibitors to Physics Teacher-Leaders’ Professional Development in a Program of Professional Learning Communities

  • Smadar Levy
  • Esther Bagno
  • Hana Berger
  • Bat-Sheva Eylon
Chapter
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Teacher-leaders play a major role in promoting science education reforms, in teachers’ Professional Development (PD) and in the development of effective Professional Learning Communities (PLCs). However, the PD of the teachers-leaders themselves is rarely discussed in the literature. This study examined the PD of high-school physics teacher-leaders in a national program of Professional Learning Communities (PLCs), along with the factors that affected their PD. The teacher-leaders participate in a PLC led by a team from the Weizmann Institute of Science, while they simultaneously lead regional PLCs of high-school physics teachers all over Israel. The program addresses the challenges of teaching physics, promotes implementation of learner-centered instructional strategies, and provides opportunities for teachers to examine collaboratively their teaching and their students’ learning. In order to study the professional growth of the teacher-leaders, and to identify the factors that motivated, contributed to, or inhibited their professional growth, we extended the Interconnected Model of Clarke and Hollingsworth (Teach Teac Educ 18(8):947–967, 2002) and adjusted it to the professional world of physics teacher-leaders. Three teacher-leaders were chosen as case studies. We studied the changes in their knowledge, attitudes, and practice in the context of a new learner-centered instructional strategy, along with the factors that affected these changes.

Keywords

Interconnected model Professional development Professional learning communities Science education Teacher-leaders 

References

  1. Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., Wallace, M., Greenwood, A., … Smith, M. (2005). Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities (Research report 637). London, UK: DfES and University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  2. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In E. Baker, B. McGaw, & P. Peterson (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (part 7) (3rd ed., pp. 548–555). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  4. Borko, H., Koellner, K., & Jacobs, J. (2014). Examining novice teacher-leaders’ facilitation of mathematics professional development. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Criswell, B. A., Rushton, G. T., McDonald, S. P., & Gul, T. (2017). A clearer vision: Creating and evolving a model to support the development of science teacher leaders. Research in Science Education, 1–27.Google Scholar
  7. Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Research review/teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46–53.Google Scholar
  8. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DuFour, R. (2004). Schools as learning communities. Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.Google Scholar
  10. Etkina, E., Gregorcic, B., & Vokos, S. (2017). Organizing physics teacher professional education around productive habit development: A way to meet reform challenges. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Even, R. (2008). Facing the challenge of educating educators to work with practicing mathematics teachers. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education: The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (pp. 57–73). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
  12. Eylon, B. S., & Bagno, E. (1997). Professional development of physics teachers through long-term in-service programs: The Israeli experience. In AIP conference proceedings (Vol. 399, p. 299).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eylon, B. S., & Bagno, E. (2006). Research-design model for professional development of teachers: Designing lessons with physics education research. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 2(2), 020106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eylon, B. S., Berger, H., & Bagno, E. (2008). An evidence based continuous professional development program on knowledge integration in physics: A study of teachers’ collective discourse. International Journal of Science Education, 30(5), 619–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. The Teachers College Record, 103, 942–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kallery, M. (2017). Early-years teachers’ professional upgrading in science: A long-term Programme. Research in Science Education, 1–28.Google Scholar
  20. Klentschy, M. (2008). Developing teacher leaders in science: Attaining and sustaining science reform. Science Educator, 17(2), 57.Google Scholar
  21. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.Google Scholar
  22. Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., & Borko, H. (2011). Mathematics professional development: Critical features for developing leadership skills and building teachers’ capacity. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 115–136.Google Scholar
  23. Levy, S., Bagno, E., Berger, H., & Eylon, B. S. (2018). Physics teacher-leaders’ learning in a national program of regional professional learning communities. In A. Traxler, Y. Cao, & S. Wolf (Eds.), Physics education research conference proceedings. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. Lewthwaite, B. (2006). Constraints and contributors to becoming a science teacher-leader. Science Education, 90(2), 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Little, J. W. (2012). Professional community and professional development in the learning- centered school. In M. Kooy & K. van Veen (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters: International perspectives (pp. 22–46). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Madsen, A., McKagan, S. B., & Sayre, E. C. (2015). How physics instruction impacts students’ beliefs about learning physics: A meta-analysis of 24 studies. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 11(1), 010115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mazur, E. (2014). Flat space, deep learning. Presented in GIREP-MPTL 2014 international conference on teaching/learning physics, July 7–12, Palermo, Italy.Google Scholar
  28. Meltzer, D. E. (2011). Research on the education of physics teachers. Teacher Education in Physics: Research, Curriculum, and Practice, 3–14.Google Scholar
  29. Milner-Bolotin, M., Egersdorfer, D., & Vinayagam, M. (2016). Investigating the effect of question-driven pedagogy on the development of physics teacher candidates’ pedagogical content knowledge. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2015). Science teachers learning: Enhancing opportunities, creating supportive contexts. Committee on Strengthening Science Education through a Teacher Learning Continuum. Board on Science Education and Teacher Advisory Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  31. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  32. Neumerski, C. M. (2013). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here? Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scherr, R. E., Plisch, M., & Goertzen, R. M. (2017). Sustaining physics teacher education coalition programs in physics teacher education. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shulman, L. S. (1997). Communities of learners and communities of teachers. Monographs of Mandel Institute.Google Scholar
  38. Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  39. van Driel, J. H., Meirink, J. A., van Veen, K., & Zwart, R. C. (2012). Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: A review of design features and quality of research. Studies in Science Education, 48(2), 129–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vescio, V., & Adams, A. (2015). Chapter 26: Learning in a professional learning community: The challenge evolves. In D. Scott & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The Sage handbook of learning. New York, NY/London, UK: SAGE.Google Scholar
  41. Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Whitcomb, J., Borko, H., & Liston, D. (2009). Growing talent. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Smadar Levy
    • 1
  • Esther Bagno
    • 1
  • Hana Berger
    • 1
  • Bat-Sheva Eylon
    • 1
  1. 1.The Science Teaching DepartmentWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations