Issues of Teaching in a New Technology-Rich Environment: Investigating the Case of New Brunswick (Canada) School Makerspaces

  • Viktor FreimanEmail author


The K-12 school system in New Brunswick, Canada, has recently experienced the new wave of technology-related innovations, in the form of makerspaces. A case study presented in this chapter, focuses on teaching and teachers in makerspaces. Six school visits done in the first year of this ongoing study allowed the research team to conduct interviews with teachers, school principals, and community experts involved in establishing and implementing this novel approach. We found that teachers who pioneered this new learning environment exhibited a particular mindset which led them to engage students in the twenty-first century learning. These teachers already had a sound experience in trying out pedagogical innovations, that helped them in dealing with a number of issues, including those related to the curriculum and assessment of student learning. The teachers’ innovations were supported by technology experts from the community. Our findings provide a better insight into the characteristics of teachers’ mindset and of how it might affect students’ makerspace learning experiences.



This study was conducted with the help of the Canadian Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (Partnership Development Grant #890-2013-0062). We also thank Brilliant Labs, our partner, and participating school districts, schools and teachers for their continuous support and collaboration in this research.


  1. Adcock, J. (2018). Disrupt a space. Makerspace. Retrieved from
  2. Blain, S., Beauchamp, J., Essiambre, C., Freiman, V., Lirette-Pitre, N., Villeneuve, D., …, Manuel, D. (2007). Les effets de l’utilisation des ordinateurs portatifs individuels sur l’apprentissage et les pratiques d’enseignement. Centre de Recherche et de Développement en Éducation. Université de Moncton. Retrieved from
  3. Blanchard, S., Freiman, V., & Lirette-Pitre, N. (2010). Strategies used by elementary schoolchildren solving robotics-based complex tasks: Innovative potential of technology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5686–5692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ‘making’ in education: The democratization of invention. In J. Walter-Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Brilliant Labs. (2017). Labos créatifs [Brilliant Labs]. Retrieved from
  6. Chiasson, M., & Freiman, V. (2017). Closing the gap: How can the school system embrace the age of acceleration? In J. Johnston (Ed.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2017 (pp. 615–620). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from
  7. Couros, G. (2015). The innovator’s mindset: Empower learning, unleash talent, and lead a culture of creativity. San Diego, CA: Dave Burgess Consulting Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Djambong, T., Freiman, V., Gauvin, S., Paquet, M., & Chiasson, M. (2018). Measurement of computational thinking in K-12 education: The need for innovative practice. In D. Sampson, D. Ifenthaler, J. M. Spector, & P. Isaías (Eds.), Digital technologies: Sustainable innovations for improving teaching and learning. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Freiman, V., Godin, J., Larose, F., Léger, M., Chiasson, M., Volkanova, V., & Goulet M. J. (2017). Towards the life-long continuum of digital competences: Exploring combination of soft-skills and digital skills development. D. D. Marti (dir.), Proceedings of the 11th annual international technology, education and development conference, INTED2017 (pp. 9518–9527). Valencia, Spain: International Academy of Technology, Education and Development (IATED).Google Scholar
  11. Freiman, V., Larose, F., Chukalovskyy, R., LeBlanc, M., Léger, M., Bourgeois, Y., & Godin, J. (2016, July 4–7). Defining and developing life-long digital competencies: Partnership building approach. Proceedings of the EDULEARN 2016 international conference, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  12. Freiman, V., & Lirette-Pitre, N. (2007). PISA 2000 case study: New Brunswick. In: Arbeitsgruppe Internationale Vergleichstudie (Hrsg.). Shullleistungen und Steurung des Scholsystems in Bundesstaat: Kanada und Deutschland in Vergleich (pp. 339–362). Muenster, Germany/New York, NY/Muenchen, Germany/Berlin, Germany: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  13. Galway, G., & Gill, D. (2018). Making time for makerspaces: Teaching through making.
  14. Gershenfeld, N. (2012). How to make almost anything. The digital fabrication revolution. Foreign Affairs, 91(6), 43–57.Google Scholar
  15. Gerstein, J. (2016). Learner empowerment. Retrieved from
  16. Gilbert, J. (2017). Educational makerspaces: Disruptive, educative or neither? New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 14(2), 80–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Government of New Brunswick. (1992). Commission on Excellence in Education: Schools for a New Century. Fredericton, NB.Google Scholar
  18. Government of New Brunswick. (2000). Let’s discuss public education governance... Retrieved from
  19. Government of New Brunswick. (2008). Retrieved from
  20. Government of New Brunswick. (2016). Everyone at their best. Retrieved from
  21. Hagel, J., Brown, J. S., & Kulasooriya, D. (2014). A movement in the making. Westlake, TX: Deloitte University Press. Retrieved from
  22. Hughes, J. (2017). Meaningful making. Establishing a makerspace in your school or classroom (Research monograph). Retrieved from
  23. Hui, J. S., & Gerber, E. M. (2017, February 25–March 1). Developing makerspaces as sites of entrepreneurship. CSCW 2017, Portland, OR, USA, pp. 2023–2038,Google Scholar
  24. Lave & Wenger. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge. University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levesque, R. (2011). École communautaire entreprenariale: Clé indispensable au développement durable.
  26. Léger, M. T., & Freiman, V. (2018). Learning to be creative: A causal-comparative study of digital skill development in a technology-rich classroom. Paper presented at the 2018 AERA Annual Meeting, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Litts, B. K. (2015). Making learning: Makerspaces as learning environments. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Liu, F., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., & Barron, A. E. (2017). Explaining technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A multilevel path analysis model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 795–813. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Love, S.-L. (2015). 4C’s model: Critical thinking, creative thinking, collaboration, communication.
  30. Maker Media. (2013). The makerspace playbook: School edition. Retrieved from
  31. Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 5(1), 30–39.Google Scholar
  32. Martinovic, D., & Freiman, V. (2013). Digital skills development for future needs of the Canadian labour market (pp. 1–71). Final report to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  33. MEDPE. (2016). Programme de mathématiques. Cadre théorique commun M-12. Fredericton, NB, Canada.Google Scholar
  34. Miller, J. (2017). Mapping elementary and middle school makerspace environments to curriculum content through STEAM (science, technology, engineering the arts, and mathematics) challenge cards. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 1357–1364). Austin, TX: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from
  35. Milton, P. (2008). A review of New Brunswick’s dedicated notebook research project one-to-one computing – A compelling school-change intervention. Canadian Education Association. Retrieved from
  36. Montessori, M. (1912). The Montessori method. New York: Frederick A. Stokes Company.Google Scholar
  37. Niederhauser, D. S., & Schrum, L. (2016, October 28–30). Enacting STEM education for digital age learners: The “maker” movement goes to school. Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International conference on cognition and exploratory learning in the digital age (CELDA) 13th, Mannheim, Germany, pp. 357–360. Retrieved from
  38. NBDE. (2006). New Brunswick Department of Education: Guidelines and Procedures for Career Exploration 110 and Copperative Education 120.
  39. Oliver, K. M. (2016). Professional development considerations for makerspace leaders, Part one: Addressing “what?” and “why?”. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 60(2), 160–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  41. Peppler, K., & Bender, S. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 22–27.
  42. Peppler, K., Keune, A., Xia, F., & Chang, S. (2014). Survey of assessment in makerspaces (Research Brief 17). Retrieved from
  43. Peterson, L., & Scharber, C. (2018). Learning about makerspaces: Professional development with K-12 inservice educators. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(1), 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Piaget, J. (1956). The origins of child intelligence. New York, NY: International University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Quinton, S., & Smallbone, T. (2010). Feeding forward: Using feedback to promote student reflection and learning: A teaching model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47, 125–135. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ravipati, S. (2017). Report: Makerspaces, coding, robotics pick up momentum in schools.
  47. Resnick, M., & Rosenbaum, E. (2013). Designing for Tinkerability. In M. Honey & D. Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators (pp. 163–181). Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Roffey, T., Sverko, C., & Therien, J. (2016). The making of a makerspace: Pedagogical and physical transformations of teaching and learning. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  49. Savard, A., & Freiman, V. (2016). Investigating complexity to assess students’ learning in a robotics task. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2(2), 93–114.Google Scholar
  50. Sheridan, K., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tan, M. (2018). When makerspaces meet school: Negotiating tensions between instruction and construction. Journal of Science Education and Technology.
  52. Voigt, C., Mair, S., & Unterfrauner, E. (2018). Hacking the knowledge of maker communities in support of 21st century education. In S. Bodrunova (Ed.), Internet science (INSCI 2018. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 11193). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  53. Vongkulluksn, V. W., Matewos, A. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Marsh, J. A. (2018). Motivational factors in makerspaces: A mixed methods study of elementary school students’ situational interest, self-efficacy, and achievement emotions. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 43.
  54. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Wardlow, L., & Harm, E. (2015). Using appropriate digital tools to overcome barriers to collaborative learning in classrooms. Educational Technology, 55(3), 32–35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université de MonctonMonctonCanada

Personalised recommendations