STEM Teachers and Teaching in the Digital Era pp 243-259 | Cite as

# Technology in Mathematics Teacher Education on Trust and Pitfalls

Chapter

First Online:

- 58 Downloads

## Abstract

Availability of easily accessible computational tools undoubtedly affects teaching and learning of mathematics. However, with technological advances often comes a blind trust in the reliability and accuracy of the digital information and unquestioned dependence on it. I focus on pitfalls in understanding mathematical ideas associated with the use of digital technology. I analyze examples in which the accessed or derived information is either incorrect or incomplete and therefore misleading, and argue for further attention to fidelity of technology in teacher education.

## Keywords

Fidelity of technology TPACK Script-writing## References

- Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2009).
*Mathematics TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) Framework*. Retrieved Dec 1, 2017 from https://amte.net/sites/all/themes/amte/resources/MathTPACKFramework.pdf - Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2017).
*Standards for preparing teachers of mathematics*. Available online at amte.net/standards. Retrieved December 1, 2017 from https://amte.net/sptm - Bos, B. (2009a). Virtual math objects with pedagogical, mathematical, and cognitive fidelity.
*Computers in Human Behavior, 25*(2), 521–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bos, B. (2009b). Technology with cognitive and mathematical fidelity: What it means for the math classroom.
*Computers in the Schools, 26*(2), 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Burrill, G. (2017). Designing interactive dynamic technology activities to support the development of conceptual understanding. In A. Leung & A. Baccaglini-Frank (Eds.),
*Digital technologies in designing mathematics education tasks: Potential and pitfalls*(pp. 303–328). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Dick, T. P. (2007). Keeping the faith, fidelity in technological tools for mathematics education. In G. W. Blume & M. K. Heid (Eds.),
*Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Vol. 2. Cases and perspectives*(pp. 333–339). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar - Harel, G. (2008).
*DNR perspective on mathematics curriculum and instruction, part II*(Vol. 40, pp. 893–907). Zentralblatt für Didaktikder Mathematik.Google Scholar - Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?
*Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9*(1). Retrieved July 8, 2017 from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/general/article1.cfm - Koichu, B., & Zazkis, R. (2013). Decoding a proof of Fermat’s Little Theorem via script writing.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32*, 364–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kontorovich, I., & Zazkis, R. (2016). Turn vs. shape: Teachers cope with incompatible perspectives on angle.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93*(2), 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lakatos, I. (1976).
*Proofs and refutations*. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Leung, A., & Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2017). Introduction. In A. Leung & A. Baccaglini-Frank (Eds.),
*Digital technologies in designing mathematics education tasks: Potential and pitfalls*(pp. vii–xvi). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mason, J., & Zazkis, R. (2019, online first). Fooled by rounding.
*Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education*.Google Scholar - Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge.
*Teachers College Record, 108*(6), 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Olive, J., Makar, K., Hoyos, V., Kor, L., Kosheleva, O., & Strässer. (2010). Mathematical knowledge and practices resulting from access to digital technologies. In C. Hoyles & J. Lagrange (Eds.),
*Mathematics education and technology – Rethinking the terrain (the 17th ICMI study)*(pp. 133–178). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar - Polygon. (n.d.).
*In Wikipedia*. Retrieved December 2, 2017, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygon - Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.
*Educational Researcher, 15*(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sirotic, N., & Zazkis, R. (2007). Irrational numbers: The gap between formal and intuitive knowledge.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65*(1), 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2000).
*How students (mis-)understand science and mathematics: Intuitive rules*. NewYork, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar - Talk: polygon. (n.d.).
*In Wikipedia*. Retrieved December 13 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Polygon - Thanheiser, E., Whitacre, I., & Roy, G. J. (2014). Mathematical content knowledge for teaching elementary mathematics: A Focus on whole-number concepts and operations.
*The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11*(2), 217.Google Scholar - Zazkis, D. (2014). Proof-scripts as a lens for exploring students’ understanding of odd/even functions.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 35*, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Zazkis, R., & Kontorovich, I. (2016). A curious case of superscript (-1): Prospective secondary mathematics teachers explain.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43*, 98–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Zazkis, R., Sinclair, N., & Liljedahl, P. (2013).
*Lesson play in mathematics education: A tool for research and professional development*. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Zazkis, R., & Sirotic, N. (2010). Representing and defining irrational numbers: Exposing the missing link.
*Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 7*, 1–27.Google Scholar - Zazkis, R., & Zazkis, D. (2014). Script writing in the mathematics classroom: Imaginary conversations on the structure of numbers.
*Research in Mathematics Education, 16*(1), 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Zazkis, R., Liljedahl, P. & Sinclair, N. (2009). Lesson Plays: Planning teaching vs. teaching planning.
*For the Learning of Mathematics, 29*(1), 40–47.Google Scholar - Zbiek, R. M., Heid, M. K., Blume, G. W., & Dick, T. P. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education: A perspective of constructs. In F. K. Lester (Ed.),
*Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*(pp. 1169–1207). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020