Advertisement

Exploring Spatial Menu Representation and Apartment-Based Categorization for Online Shopping

  • Marco SpeicherEmail author
  • Nadja RutschEmail author
  • Antonio KrügerEmail author
  • Markus LöchtefeldEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11747)

Abstract

This work aims to explore, design and implement better and intuitive categorization schemes and menu representations for online shops that enrich and improve the shopping experience. We utilize the Apartment metaphor, in which products are categorized into rooms and furniture representing departments and shelves. Furthermore, we developed a realistic and interactive map-based spatial menu representation based on prior research findings. In a comparative user study, we evaluated our new menu categorization and representation in comparison with the current standard in online shops, based on real data from a local retailer. The results show that our apartment-based categorization in combination with a spatial representation outperforms all other conditions regarding all tested variables of performance (success rate, task completion time) and preferences (user experience, usability, workload).

Keywords

Online shop Product categorization Menu representation Usability User experience 

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (mp4 11384 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Adam, S., Mukasa, K.S., Breiner, K., Trapp, M.: An apartment-based metaphor for intuitive interaction with ambient assisted living applications. In: Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction, BCS-HCI 2008, vol. 1, pp. 67–75. British Computer Society, Swinton, UK (2008). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1531514.1531524
  2. 2.
    Ahlström, D., Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C., Irani, P.: Why it’s quick to be square: modelling new and existing hierarchical menu designs. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2010, pp. 1371–1380. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753534. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1753326.1753534
  3. 3.
    Brooke, J.: SUS: a retrospective. J. Usability Stud. 8(2), 29–40 (2013). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2817912.2817913Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheng, H.I., Patterson, P.E.: Iconic hyperlinks on e-commerce websites. Appl. Ergon. 38(1), 65–69 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.01.007. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687006000214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S.: A predictive model of menu performance. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2007, pp. 627–636. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240723. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240723
  6. 6.
    Findlater, L., Moffatt, K., McGrenere, J., Dawson, J.: Ephemeral adaptation: the use of gradual onset to improve menu selection performance. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009, pp. 1655–1664. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518956. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518956
  7. 7.
    Griffith, D.A.: An examination of the influences of store layout in online retailing. J. Bus. Res. 58(10), 1391–1396 (2005). https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:58:y:2005:i:10:p:1391-1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gutwin, C., Cockburn, A.: Improving list revisitation with listmaps. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI 2006, pp. 396–403. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1133265.1133347. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1133265.1133347
  9. 9.
    Hart, S.G., Stavenland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock, P.A., Meshkati, N. (eds.) Human Mental Workload, pp. 139–183. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1988). http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20000004342_1999205624.pdfGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hearst, M.A.: Clustering versus faceted categories for information exploration. Commun. ACM 49(4), 59–61 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1121949.1121983. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1121949.1121983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang, Z., Benyoucef, M.: From e-commerce to social commerce: a close look at design features. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 12(4), 246–259 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2012.12.003. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156742231200124X. Social Commerce- Part 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Katz, M.A., Byrne, M.D.: Effects of scent and breadth on use of site-specific search on e-commerce web sites. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 10(3), 198–220 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1145/937549.937551. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/937549.937551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kiger, J.I.: The depth/breadth trade-off in the design of menu-driven user interfaces. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 20(2), 201–213 (1984).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(84)80018-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Larson, K., Czerwinski, M.: Web page design: implications of memory, structure and scent for information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 1998, pp. 25–32. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1145/274644.274649
  15. 15.
    Laugwitz, B., Held, T., Schrepp, M.: Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In: Holzinger, A. (ed.) USAB 2008. LNCS, vol. 5298, pp. 63–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lazar, J.: User-Centered Web Development: Theory into Practice, 2nd edn. Jones and Bartlett Publishers Inc., Sudbury (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    MacKenzie, I.S.: Human-Computer Interaction: An Empirical Research Perspective, 1st edn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Madu, C.N., Madu, A.A.: Dimensions of e-quality. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 19(3), 246–258 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710210415668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meschtscherjakov, A., Reitberger, W., Lankes, M., Tscheligi, M.: Enhanced shopping: a dynamic map in a retail store. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp 2008, pp. 336–339. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1409635.1409680. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1409635.1409680
  20. 20.
    Miller, C.S., Remington, R.W.: Modeling information navigation: implications for information architecture. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 19(3), 225–271 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miller, D.P.: The depth/breadth tradeoff in hierarchical computer menus. Proc. Hum. Factors Soc. Annu. Meet. 25(1), 296–300 (1981).  https://doi.org/10.1177/107118138102500179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mitchell, J., Shneiderman, B.: Dynamic versus static menus: an exploratory comparison. SIGCHI Bull. 20(4), 33–37 (1989).  https://doi.org/10.1145/67243.67247. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/67243.67247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moagăr-Poladian, S., Dumitrescu, G.C., Tănase, I.A.: Retail e-commerce (E-tail) – evolution, characteristics and perspectives in China, the USA and Europe. Glob. Econ. Observer 5(1) (2017). https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntu/ntugeo/vol5-iss1-17-167.html
  24. 24.
    Murano, D.P., Sander, M.: User interface menu design performance and user preferences: a review and ways forward. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 7(4), 355–361 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2016.070447. http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2016.070447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Norman, K.L.: Better design of menu selection systems through cognitive psychology and human factors. Hum. Factors 50(3), 556–559 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288411. pMID: 18689067MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Petz, G., Greiner, A.: First in search – how to optimize search results in e-commerce web shops. In: Nah, F.F.-H. (ed.) HCIB 2014. LNCS, vol. 8527, pp. 566–574. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07293-7_55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Plechawska-Wojcik, M.: Heuristic evaluation and user experience assessment of online shopping portals using cognitive walkthrough and expert method. In: Human Capital without Borders: Knowledge and Learning for Quality of Life; Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2014, pp. 467–475. ToKnowPress (2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Resnick, M.L., Sanchez, J.: Effects of organizational scheme and labeling on task performance in product-centered and user-centered retail web sites. Hum. Factors 46(1), 104–117 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.104.30390. pMID: 15151158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Robertson, G., Czerwinski, M., Larson, K., Robbins, D.C., Thiel, D., van Dantzich, M.: Data mountain: using spatial memory for document management. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST 1998, pp. 153–162. ACM, New York, NY, USA (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1145/288392.288596. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/288392.288596
  30. 30.
    Scarr, J., Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C., Bunt, A.: Improving command selection with commandMaps. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 257–266 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207713
  31. 31.
    Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., Thomaschewski, J.: Construction of a benchmark for the user experience questionnaire (UEQ). Int. J. Interact. Multimed. Artif. Intell. 4(4), 40–44 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schwartz, J.P., Norman, K.L.: The importance of item distinctiveness on performance using a menu selection system. Behav. Inf. Technol. 5(2), 173–182 (1986).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01449298608914510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sears, A., Shneiderman, B.: Split menus: effectively using selection frequency to organize menus. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 1(1), 27–51 (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1145/174630.174632. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/174630.174632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shim, S., Eastlick, M.A., Lotz, S.L., Warrington, P.: An online prepurchase intentions model: the role of intention to search: best overall paper award-the sixth triennial AMS/ACRA retailing conference, 200011. J. Retail. 77(3), 397–416 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00051-3. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435901000513. Decision made by a panel of journal of retailing editorial board membersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Speicher, M., Cucerca, S., Krüger, A.: VRShop: a mobile interactive virtual reality shopping environment combining the benefits of on- and offline shopping. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquit. Technol. 1(3), 102:1–102:31 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3130967. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3130967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Speicher, M., Hell, P., Daiber, F., Simeone, A., Krüger, A.: A virtual reality shopping experience using the apartment metaphor. In: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI 2018, pp. 17:1–17:9. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3206505.3206518. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3206505.3206518
  37. 37.
    Tsandilas, T., schraefel, m.c.: Bubbling menus: a selective mechanism for accessing hierarchical drop-down menus. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2007, pp. 1195–1204. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240806. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240806
  38. 38.
    Tuch, A.N., Roth, S.P., HornbæK, K., Opwis, K., Bargas-Avila, J.A.: Is beautiful really usable? toward understanding the relation between usability, aesthetics, and affect in HCI. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(5), 1596–1607 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vrechopoulos, A.P., O’Keefe, R.M., Doukidis, G.I., Siomkos, G.J.: Virtual store layout: an experimental comparison in the context of grocery retail. J. Retail. 80(1), 13–22 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2004.01.006. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002243590400003XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wallace, D.F., Anderson, N.S., Shneiderman, B.: Time stress effects on two menu selection systems. Proc. Hum. Factors Soc. Annu. Meet. 31(7), 727–731 (1987).  https://doi.org/10.1177/154193128703100708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wigand, R.T., Benjamin, R.I., Birkland, J.L.H.: Web 2.0 and beyond: implications for electronic commerce. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Electronic Commerce, ICEC 2008, pp. 7:1–7:5. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1409540.1409550. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1409540.1409550
  42. 42.
    Zaphiris, P., Kurniawan, S.H., Darin Ellis, R.: Age related differences and the depth vs. breadth tradeoff in hierarchical online information systems. In: Carbonell, N., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) UI4ALL 2002. LNCS, vol. 2615, pp. 23–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36572-9_2. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1765426.1765429CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhang, F., Lin, S., Li, X., Shuai, Y., Jiang, H., Yao, C., Ying, F., Gao, F.: Navigation configuration and placement influences the visual search efficiency and preference. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, WWW 2017, pp. 871–872. Companion, International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3054236

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)Saarland Informatics Campus (SIC)SaarbrückenGermany
  2. 2.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations